Medical Freedom Amendment 28 Blog - 28th Medical Freedom Amendment

Medical Freedom Amendment 28 Anthem

3/5/2025

National Health Federation Celebrates 70 years
fighting for Health Freedom!

Medical Freedom Amendment Anthem

The National Health Federation 70th Anniversary Celebration

LEADING THE HEALTH-FREEDOM RENAISSANCE
MARCH 14-16 IN DALLAS, TEXAS
Renaissance Dallas North Hotel - (972) 869-4300
1590 Lyndon B Johnson Freeway, Dallas, Texas 75234

     Be part of a historic gathering in Dallas, Texas, as the National Health Federation commemorates seven decades of championing your right to health freedom. Discover groundbreaking insights and connect with like-minded individuals dedicated to health advocacy.
     There will be more than 18 special guests presenting over a wide range of subjects related to health freedom with over 20 booths promoting products, actions and information. The Keynote presentation will be given by Dr. Peter McCullough, M.D. Also present will be Judy Mikovits, PhD and Dr. Thomas Levy as well as the President of the NHF, Scott Tips, J.D..
           You can register here and entrance to the event is only $45.00.
     Below is a PDF of the Medical Freedom Amendment brochure to be given out.

Health Freedom Requires Medical Freedom

2/10/2025

We Must Stop Medical Catastrophe

Without the Medical Freedom Amendment,
health freedom will never become a reality.

     While writing the book for the Medical Freedom Amendment (MFA) one must look at history and at all the medical abuses from the last couple hundred years. It makes one realize how much would never have happened if the US Constitution had placed Medical Freedom alongside freedom of the press, speech and religion. Those three were recognized for the multitude of opinions, realities, narratives, perspectives, and possibilities. Medicine also provides a wide framework of approaches, each with its unique application and use, and its own results.
     What did occur instead was the ultimate domination of one school of medicine based on German materialism, vaccination, and pharmacology. (Flexner Report of 1910) Allopathic medicine then moved relentlessly to destroy any other approach. It did this initially because allopathic medicine was brutal, cruelly experimental, and filled with hubris and competition. Allopathic medicine was linked to oil, coal tar derivatives, and produced profits with high customer retention. The rule was "Any other medicine is bad for business." The wealthy (Rockefeller and Carnegie) had decided the countries' health trajectory. Now 2025 is striving for world domination.
     Most important allopathic medicine was losing customers to homeopathy. Homeopathy was the preferred school of medicine because of its gentleness, working with the body, clearly stated rules of application, and beneficial effectiveness. Earlier, in 1854 Abraham Lincoln prepared a state legislative proposal to charter a homeopathic medical college in Chicago. He was an avid user of homeopathy. Chicago was the home of the American Medical Association, which had been founded in 1847 in part to stop the growth of homeopathy, and therefore, Lincoln's job was no simple effort, and he succeeded.
      Despite the success of homeopathic treatment on General George McClellan of the Union army in January 1862, “The Army Medical Board rejected requests by homeopathic doctors to serve in military hospitals, arguing that to grant this request would invite applications from all types of ‘quacks’ and ‘charlatans’ claiming medical expertise.”
      As President in 1862 Lincoln signed a bill allocating some civil war military hospitals over to homeopaths because of their unparalleled success in treating cholera, yellow fever, diphtheria and influenza compared to allopathic medicine. Have you ever used that popular product for flu Oscillococcinum?
      The role taken by allopathic medicine which morphed into industrial medicine was to destroy competition, label competitors as quacks, and unscientific. However, today, the opposite has proven true. With the growth of biochemistry, bionutrition, and biophysics the school of Homeopathy is finally recognized as the science of tomorrow which has always been there. Nevertheless, the attacks remain and even the World Health Organization has given itself over to allopathic medicine even though homeopathy is the most practiced medicine in the world.
     This is only one aspect of what would be different today if the Medical Freedom Amendment was here from the start of the Constitution. For example, water fluoridation would not be an issue at all. It would be illegal because it lacks informed consent, universal medication without dosage or medical supervision - which are reasons enough to not add it, and of course medical choice. The toxic waste chemical used, fluorosilicic acid, is an enzyme disruptor that destroys biological activity. Once added to water it becomes a product and no longer toxic waste. So that benefits the bottom lines of industry and dentistry.
     The same would be for fluoride in toothpaste. The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) has always listed fluoride as a toxin. There is no controlled dosage and swallowing more than a pea size should require a visit to the poison control center. This makes it especially dangerous for children with the sweet taste of toothpaste formulated for them in the toothpaste, fortunately it does have a warning label.
      Actually, fluoride is contained in about 25% of all the pharmaceutical products. Pharmaceuticals are generally regulated poisons. Fluoride is especially effective for slowing down the thyroid and is used for people with an overactive thyroid. Again, not everyone has an overactive thyroid and getting fluoride in the drinking water not only can reduce intelligence which the District Court ruled to be the case, it can harm the thyroid gland - no medical choice, nor informed consent of the individual.
      As an aside, the thyroid gland requires iodine to function well. Iodine is a halogen just like fluoride, except fluoride is heavier and knocks iodine out taking its place. For the thyroid to be healthy requires proper levels of L-tyrosine (an amino acid). When testing for thyroid health one looks at T-1, T-2, T-3, T-4. These numbers refer to one molecule of tyrosine with 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 molecules of iodine. If those are replaced with fluoride, then the health of the thyroid gland is impacted. If this occurs daily eventually it is damaged, and many health issues arise once one has low thyroid activity. This may bring many lawsuits against water companies, perhaps the obesity issue is also influenced by this situation.
     In New Zealand they already knew fluoride causes hip fractures. They studied bone tissue during an epidemic that occurred twenty years after fluoride had been added to public water and witnessed how fluoride seeks calcium and stopped the enzymatic action for repairing bone tissue resulting in thin brittle bone tissue that with the slightest bump fractured.
     Another major area of legal irresponsibility is the high exposure to electromagnetic radiation pollution created by cell towers, satellites, and other wireless devices. The strength levels of most of these devices can easily interact with peoples' biological systems creating illness and disease. The government's malfeasance in this area is extraordinary, to say the least. That is why the government, being controlled by corporate interests, more than any other sector will oppose the Medical Freedom Amendment unless the correct approach is taken.
     To know the true facts is the most important necessity. The Medical Freedom Amendment gives power to those who seek facts and enforcement of the Amendment keeps us healthy and out of dangers way. The MFA provides the legal means to protect the general public from massive propaganda and manipulation by government agencies, corporations and military operations that seek to control our lives and choices.
      We must protect Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press to further enable this important life related process of choice. Without those freedoms Medical Freedom would be an empty promise. We must protect life and the personal inalienable right to secure one's health in the manner one chooses with informed consent, and medical choice.
     Some may say that the right to make your medical choice is already protected. There is proof, more than ever, that is not true. The past few years are enough by displaying brutal denial. There is little and in some cases no protection without the written force of a Medical Freedom Amendment to stop abuse, degradation of health and egregious behavior.
     We cannot be relied on sources that do not have our best interests and personal needs as their goals. We live in a world where the unexpected happens, and actions occur without our knowledge endangering health while censorship excludes exposure and deny many other attacks upon our health and denial of other therapeutic solutions.
     The Present directs us to life in a state of corporate Feudal Fascism where others control and decide our personal welfare, health and medical decisions. This is true for every man, woman, and child who may need or not need medical care. Medical decisions based on totalitarianism affects each individual's life. Every person needs to be protected from medical malpractice, overreach, and experimentation whether it is the government or medical industry's "Standard of Care" producing harm. Personal choice must be honored and protected legally with recourse when denied.
     Each person, man, woman, child, pregnant woman, or any other one, must be protected from laws that overreach and deny the medical rights of an individual for their health and protection. This perhaps will seem wrong for some when bias enters the picture, but bias has no place in Freedom. It can be difficult for another to include the reality of another person when it goes against what they know in their reality. That is why we need discussions and interactions.
     Nevertheless, no law should pass that denies anyone their inalienable rights to medical choice and Life. Medical practice is an individual special relationship with a health care provider and or oneself and should not be destroyed by the government or some manifested form of synthetic intelligence. It should be protected.
     We need to support the Medical Freedom Amendment to have health protection from any and all government, international agreements, and treaties that impede Medical freedom. Here is the Amendment as stated:
     "All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment."
     "Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
      The Medical Freedom Amendment videos are on YouTube and the MFA blog March 2024 at MedicalFreedomAmendment.org in several languages – Spanish, French, German, Portuguese, and Italian. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-h2K-8HUvU
     Join the National Health Federation. Take part in supporting the Medical Freedom Amendment. Go to Campaigns at https://thenhf.com/pass-the-medical-freedom-amendment/
The NHF Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign
-Michael LeVesque-

Medical Freedom Amendment 28 Ballad

1/12/2025

Reminder and Path Forward

Play this ballad as a reminder of the road to travel.

"Without the Medical Freedom Amendment,
health freedom will never become a reality."

     The Medical Freedom Amendment Anthem is to motivate and enlighten us of the great opportunity, responsibility, and challenge facing this Nation. In our hours and days of major medical and health issues it is apparent they are a result of the landscape and its mismanagement in which we reside.
     Pollution is the number one cause of disease. Pollution is broad and covers electromagnetic radiation pollution, chemical and pharmaceutical pollution, genetically modified organisms of bioengineering, and chemical trails of geoengineering pollution.
     These pollutants are all sprayed, injected, radiated, exploded and spread without medical choice, or informed consent. These pollutants affect the soil, the ocean, lakes and rivers, ground water, air we breathe, the atmosphere, the food we eat, the creatures upon the earth and even the outer resonances of energy surrounding the Earth.
     We have the means to change this, but it would bring economic losses to many who rely on building these systems. The great wealth that maintains these problems fight relentlessly to ignore them. However they are aware of what is happening and do all in their power to maintain its growth. It is a sad case of some form of corporate insanity that creates wealth for the few and suffering for the many.
     In the Chorus the word "plough" is a reminder and tribute to our agrarian past as a Nation. At the beginning this country offered each person the opportunity of a home and land, a small farm to grow food for oneself and others, a guarantee of sustenance, strength, and independence.
     In the South where plantations had monocrops of tobacco, cotton, peanuts and others there were small plots dedicated to gardens for subsistence of slaves. Today the landscape is filled with monocrops that fill the horizon and feed many. They consist of corn, soy, wheat, and others. The farms no longer employ the many as mechanization and soon the eventual robotics of synthetic intelligence will take its final disruption of human labor.
     The same is happening in transportation where driver-less vehicles will take over taxis, ships, planes, and trains disrupting unions and human labor. This is in process and along with it has come personal surveillance, regulation of our health and personal lives. This extends to our cities, communities, and homes.
     The human spirit is not meant to be replaced or imprisoned like a chain gang. During World War II people took their yards and any space where there was soil and planted a Victory Garden to grow food and maintain health.
     That spirit is necessary now. We have an opportunity and responsibility, an obligation as citizens, to protect freedom, choice, and our health for ourselves and the future generations. The Medical Freedom Amendment is the necessary goal to place us outside the prison of feudal fascism and totalitarian slavery.
     Most have left the farm, no longer infused with the connection to Nature, critical observation, and timely consideration. For all those who maintain this sacred relationship and others who recognize their loss, join now and together work to have the Medical Freedom Amendment as the 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution. It will be protection of our Freedom through the Law of the land and a beacon to the watching world.
     Here is the Amendment to read:
     "All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment."
     "Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
     Please join the National Health Federation campaign below and please share with any other organization seeking medical freedom.
https://thenhf.com/pass-the-medical-freedom-amendment/ Music and voice by Music video - udio (voice and music) lyrics by Michael LeVesque
Available on YouTube as a short https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vbMPmoIHWLg

Parental vs Governmental Rights

1/6/2025

Protect Your Child

     The US Constitution and Bill of Rights protects the precious right and responsibility of health we can provide to our children only if we demand that protection and enforce those rights. Medical Freedom is not listed, it is only inferred. Therefore, we need the Medical Freedom Amendment to stand as a constant reminder to that freedom for health and life.
      Parental rights has become a major issue since the COVID-19 vaccination program which does not provide informed consent and creates many egregious issues. Parents are the necessary decision makers for their children. Informed consent requires that the person giving consent not only is fully informed, they are also capable of comprehending the full meaning of any medical procedure, comprehending its ramifications and outcome. Children are not of that age. They come under the sole protection and decision of the parents.
     The necessary protection has been denied by the government at all levels - legislative, executive, and judicial. See the Blog for specific details.
     As an aid in this dire situation it is important to share any article that assists parents in protecting their children through the medical maze of today.
   The following full article in its entirety because of its extreme relevance to parental rights and medical freedom. Please share it and discuss it with others, especially your school administrators, nurses, and departments of education. It appears that schools can become the hospitals of tomorrow without boundaries and enforced regulations of medical freedom and body autonomy of our children. This is called ownership and must not be allowed.
     At the same time there is a grave necessity for parents to converse with their children, support them in a way that keeps communication open and honest. Parents need to be a part of their children's lives more than ever because of the the many influences arising outside the family.
     Here are two links that quickly take you to details of minor consent, parental rights, and school based health centers.
     Here is the reprint from the organization Stand for Health Freedom that posted this information a couple years ago. It remains especially relevant throughout these difficult times of courts enforcing governmental decision contrary to parental rights.

     "...make sure you’re prepared to address the next threat to health freedom taking place in schools throughout the nation. As reported in our Battles ahead email, School-based Health Centers (SBHCs) are expanding across the country, thanks to recent federal action, including the June 2022 passage of the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act in Congress and quickly followed by millions of dollars in grants awarded to states by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for expansion of SBHCs.
     Don’t let the name fool you (or your lawmakers). They sound old hat, but School-based Health Centers are not your typical school-nurse model of care where minor illnesses and injuries are treated. SBHCs are intended by the Biden-Harris administration to be the “medical home” for your child, including primary health care services, reproductive counseling, dental care, and mental health counseling, replacing what the child would typically receive from providers outside of the school. Even worse, the Department of Education (DOE) has proposed changing the process for students with Individualized Education Plans (IEPs), removing the requirement for schools to receive parental consent before submitting Medicaid claims for reimbursement on behalf of their children. Their stated purpose for doing so is to streamline their process for reimbursement, overcoming a perceived administrative burden, while prioritizing Medicaid as the primary school funding source for providing legally required services to students with disabilities. When schools make Medicaid claims on behalf of the child, care and services parents seek outside of school risk being denied, preventing the child from getting the care he or she needs.
     Since SBHCs are currently completely unregulated, there’s no set standard for who employs the providers, which services are offered, whether the services are provided to only students or also the community at-large, or how parental presence and parental consent are handled. Some schools are only asking parents to sign a single form at the start of the school year for their child to be seen in the SBHC anytime (and for any reason) throughout the school year. Other schools in states with minor consent laws are not only bypassing parental consent, but also intentionally withholding information in the name of “the student’s privacy.” There are also questions about which laws (if any) govern this health data since FERPA regulates student data, HIPAA regulates health data, and loopholes exist for both.
     Some proponents of SBHCs argue that these in-school clinics promote better access to health care for children and relieve busy parents of the burden of taking their children to the doctor. But medical ethics do not allow physicians to treat minors without a parent or guardian present, which is why parents cannot simply drop their child off at the doctor’s office and come back later to collect them. As previously stated, neither the federal government nor any state currently regulates School-based Health Centers nor provides guardrails for parental consent, parental presence during the time of treatment, or student health data privacy within the SBHC.
     What’s worse, we’re seeing a wave of states across the country filing bills to lower the age of consent to medical care from age 18 to as low as age 11. This means schools do not have to get parental consent to treat the child and, even worse, parental objection to treatment is meaningless. When you combine the push for health care expansion within schools (a place where children are away from their parents) with the push for minor consent laws (nullifying the need for parents), the anti-parent agenda becomes clear.
     One example of this playing out in real time can be seen in California. In 2011, California passed a minor consent law allowing children to consent to their own medical care beginning at age 12. In July 2022, Harvard’s Center for Policy Law and Innovation and University of California, Davis jointly published their research showing that School-based Health Centers are even more effective at increasing HPV vaccination rates than state mandates. Pairing SBHCs with minor consent laws almost entirely eliminates the biggest obstacle to HPV vaccines: parental objection.

What can parents do?
As always, at Stand for Health Freedom we don’t just talk about the problems; we bring you solutions. We don’t have to sit idly by as predatory policy is passed around us, leaving our children vulnerable. As Andy Zay (Indiana state Senator, Congressional candidate, and author of the nation’s first parent-friendly SBHC bill) said in his testimony, “Parents are not the problem, parents are the solution.”
Easy steps you can take to protect your child, grandchild, or loved one below.
Steps you can take
NStep One: Download the SHF “Cliff’s Notes” on SBHCs to arm yourself with easy-to-digest info before school’s in session again this year.
Download
NStep Two: Share this info far and wide to help parents across the country know to stand guard. Click the links on the left side of the page to share to social media, or forward the email you got from us.
NStep Three: If you’re not yet on our email list, make sure to sign up. We have strategic action items and updates coming your way on this issue, which will only grow as schools open and the federal government sets their budget for the coming year.
Join
My Child, My Choice
-end-
     Also, pass on the lobbying efforts of the National Health Federation and the growing awareness of the Medical Freedom Amendment.
     The Medical Freedom Amendment videos are on YouTube and the MFA blog March 2024 at MedicalFreedomAmendment.org in several languages – Spanish, French, German, Portuguese, and Italian. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-h2K-8HUvU
     Join the National Health Federation. Take part in supporting the Medical Freedom Amendment. Go to Campaigns at https://thenhf.com/pass-the-medical-freedom-amendment/
The NHF Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign
-Michael LeVesque-

Facts and Freedom

12/12/2024

The Real Facts and the Election

      Regardless of what the political pundits say, the election results were from something much deeper that we experienced as a whole and as a Nation. Over the COVID-19 debacle the media whipped us into a frenzy of fear and desperation by controlled propaganda. It now demonstrates gaping holes of reason and soundness looking back. The political, economic, and health narratives were manipulation and propaganda by a mass media government campaign.
     The results that emerged are the destruction of medical freedom, medical sanity, and the health of the Nation. It also divided the Nation between believers and non-believers. Meanwhile massive suffering by both groups took place. The confusion and distrust produced an electorate that recognized we had been deceived, misled, bluffed, hoodwinked, and hoaxed.
     There was enough of that electorate to say we will determine the election. Once the Republicans accepted Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and denied by the Democrats, the election results were determined and delivered.
      People were angry witnessing the denial of a fair hearing of different narratives regarding all the events that took place with COVID-19. They also came to comprehend the World Health Organization’s power to determine our sovereign rights to body autonomy and Informed Consent. The anger grew as families lost beloved healthy members to an outdated medical system controlled and propagandized by the Pharmaceutical Industry.
     Informed Consent is a Rule of Law which means that it cannot be pre-empted nor is it conditional by the passage of any law denying it. Therefore, there are no conditions restraining its actions. Informed consent goes hand in hand with medical choice. One cannot make a medical choice without informed consent.
      Did you know that the Pfizer shots listed hundreds of side-effects (bad effects – there can only be good or bad effects) prior to approval? Were you ever told that? Of course you were not, and that means you were denied your Informed Consent.
      Our government must protect our society and it failed by denying the open discussion of medical therapeutics and analysis of scientific observations. It then incurred the greatest egregious actions against We, the people. It denied informed consent. It colluded through past legislative acts to deny justice and a reckoning of the injustices and abuses.
      It did this by authority of the USA Patriot Act of 2001, and the PREP Act of 2005 to function as a military response with immunity from liability. This legislation brought our Nation to its knees. Courts egregiously adhered to these laws, further denying children the protection of their parents.
      However, there are elections and change takes place. How great the change will depend on the will of a few and the cognizance of the many.
      Now more than ever is our opportunity to protect our freedom and our health. This can only occur in an open society and a responsible government. Medical freedom is an inalienable right and guaranteed to every person through a constitutional amendment.
      Once accomplished, we must eliminate medical propaganda and advertising. We need to insure medical and scientific intellectual freedom. We need to bring medicine into the vast world of healing offered by many other modes.
      WE are in a crisis now. The facts portend a deepening of that crisis unless we act now. Here are some facts. In 2022 we spent 4.5 trillion dollars on health care greater than the military budget. That is equal to $13,000.00 per person. The CDC (Center for Disease Control) reported 3.8 chronic diseases in person’s who died from COVID-19. Statistics show 50% of the population as obese or overweight.- compare that with Japan which has 3%. One out of three children are diabetic, and 18% of teens have liver dysfunction. Meanwhile, 47% of advertising revenues in the media are from pharmaceutical ads.
      As Abraham Lincoln said, “I am a firm believer in the people. If given the truth, they can be depended upon to meet any national crisis. The great point is to bring them the real facts.”
      This determined the outcome of the election. Deep inside people knew there must be change. Lincoln’s words are literal and a foundation for our democratic livelihood. People must have the real facts! This is what RFK, Jr. based his goals.
      In repeating the Amendment, I hope you will eventually know it by heart and can discuss it with each other. The Medical Freedom Amendment should absolutely be the prime goal of every nation to protect its people’s health.
      "All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.
      Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
      The Medical Freedom Amendment videos are on YouTube and the MFA blog March 2024 at MedicalFreedomAmendment.org in several languages – Spanish, French, German, Portuguese, and Italian. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-h2K-8HUvU
     Join the National Health Federation. Take part in supporting the Medical Freedom Amendment. Go to Campaigns at https://thenhf.com/pass-the-medical-freedom-amendment/
The NHF Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign
-Michael LeVesque-

Medical Freedom & Parental Consent Destroyed

11/18/2024

A Child's Rights Destroyed by the Judge

    This is a most egregious Blog to share. It reports bias and ignorance of such depth with despotic behavior that allowed to continue will be the end of government by the people, for the people, of the people. Only a massive rejection of these egregious actions can save us, More than ever we need the protections of parental rights and medical freedom from interference by a government that no longer thinks and acts rationally.
     As one witnesses attacks on medical freedom by the many people in power and especially in the Court system, how can justice prevail? These action demonstrate that parental rights have disappeared and children have become property of the State. These court decisions are being repeated in other States. It is essential to comprehend the impact and dangers for the future and must be shared as much as possible. This first example is general.
     There are currently cases in the US where our government has kidnapped children because of medical choices and or procedures about which the child may or may not disagree with their parents, or the hospital disagrees with the parent's decision which prefers a different treatment not recognized by the standard of care of the hospital. This denial of informed consent and medical freedom is egregious and destructive of many rights and freedom.
     The Medical Freedom Amendment needs to be purposely broad and clear to cover all threats and possible abuses unpredictable and unforeseeable. Its passage is necessary during these times, proven by past actions and the grave danger of the present and the unknowable future.
     Medical choice includes medical intervention which requires medical choice and informed consent. As with the First Amendment, it is short and broad. To be clear, the most important part of the Amendment is the first sentence: "All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose."
     In the case of parental rights, informed consent requires that the person giving consent not only is fully informed, they are capable of comprehending the full meaning of any medical procedure, its ramifications and outcome.
     Children are not of that age. They come under the sole protection and decision of the parents. Only the parents know their children and the child's past.
     According to a decision made by the Vermont Supreme Court, the government is able to inject kids with experimental products — even if the father and mother do not give their permission. The court, like the Supreme Court of South Carolina made an egregious decision validating the outdated Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act. The Court never addressed privacy protections under state or federal law nor matters of bodily autonomy. This case involved a six year old boy who was forcibly taken from the classroom without calling parents and given a COVID-19 "countermeasure" called a vaccination under the child's duress.
     Attorney John Klar reported, "“…acting ‘under color’ of Vermont law – and cloaked in its authority, took L.P. from his seat in class, and while L.P.protested, escorted him to the clinic.
“This action deprived L.P., and, derivatively, his parents, of their Article 11 right to be free in their persons from unreasonable seizure by agents of the State, without due process.
“[School officials] then injected L.P. with an experimental substance, while they held him in place. They did it without consent, while L.P. protested what they were doing to him.
“This act deprived L.P., and, derivatively, his parents, of their Article 11 right to be free from intrusion into their bodily integrity by agents of the State, without due process.”
     One need not be an attorney to see that what was done to this child by a government authority was every parent’s worst nightmare. If that nightmare could be made worse, it would be by a state court system that denied any relief to the family: a court system that sided absolutely with the federal government and a large corporate manufacturer at the expense of all Vermont children’s rights!
     Such rights to our children’s safety can never be abrogated by any court in this land. Fundamental liberties are ‘inalienable’ by any government action including federal statute (including the PREP Act), and regardless of whether Vermont’s highest court can comprehend that this is the Supreme law of this land."
     READ IN APP for much more detail and significance to this case.
     The federal PREP Act makes no reference to parental consent. It has left that to the courts which are destroying longstanding, essential medical rights of parents and informed consent, and unreasonable seizure. This was an act of force against the will of a child under age, without parental consent, who could not physically fight back and was forcibly injected with a genetically modified organism that is also proven experimental, harmful, and dangerous.
     It is not a vaccine. It is government approved injections as anti-terrorists’ “countermeasure” in the form of technological computerized formulas in a sea of chemicals foreign to our bodies of a genetically modified organism under authority of the Patriot Act of 2001, and the PREP Act of 2005 to function as a military response with immunity of liability. The PREP Act is no longer active. The most recent analysis of the effects of this injection shows great possible harm.
      Is the State destroying public education by such brutal, barbaric, and draconian actions? What parent can now trust a public government school or public health clinic when seeking help for their child?
     A 2023 review of academic literature concluded:
“Ethical challenges can arise when vaccines are mandated for all ages, but they increase significantly when mandated for children…
“Children are less susceptible to COVID-19; the disease severity in children is mild, and the potential benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine are low, so mandating vaccines is untenable…
“Mandates imply coercion, which might agitate the reaction towards COVID-19 vaccination and increase anti-vaccination attitudes among the public.”
     My personal interpretation of what is occurring is the realization that we have a government based on fascism. Corporate law has overtaken the Rule of Law. The government is a corporation with stock holders, which includes everyone with a social security number, and the courts are corporations as well with stock holders and they are now meting out decisions based on legal corporate law that are feudal, oppressive, undemocratic, authoritarian based on corporate legislative acts and the denial of the Rule of Law. We are in Feudal fascism.
     These decisions are egregious and frighteningly displaying the denial of freedom and rights in this country. The United States has become a colony to corporate wealth that feeds off the wealth of the general public. We are constantly reminded of the dangers of Communism and ignore the dangers of Fascism. It is time to recognize this insidious change that has taken place.
     This is destruction of freedom and rights that is so abusive that one's anger must be tempered so as not to do something foolish in response. However, there must be a response to hold all parties responsible and legally at fault through some means or another. Rebellion for such acts requires organization and management.
     The Medical Freedom Amendment can provide that coming together and organized rebellion against those striking down freedom and rights.
     "All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.
     Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
      Here's the help you need to make it happen.
   Support the National Health Federation’s Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign to connect with your legislators and aid the lobbying of the NHF.
The time is NOW!
-Michael LeVesque-

Medical Freedom Amendment - Freedom and Rights

10/31/2024

Rights and Freedom under the Medical Freedom Amendment

     The Medical Freedom Amendment has two terms that are often used interchangeably, but they do have subtle distinctions. For that reason they are included in the wording of the Medical Freedom Amendment. The Amendment states, “the right of medical choice” and “the freedom of medical choice”.
      A right is a legally or morally granted entitlement that imposes an obligation on others to either do something or refrain from doing something. It is enforceable by law, and if violated, the law provides remedies or protections. A specific right involves active duties or prohibitions on the governments and other legal entities, such as courts.
      For example, a fair trial means the government and courts must ensure a person receives a fair judicial process. In the Medical Freedom Amendment, “the right to medical choice” means that governments must protect a person’s medical choice regardless of what it is. This is an active duty required of the government in all its forms to ensure the right is upheld.
     Rights can be positive involving a duty to provide something. It can also be negative imposing a duty on others to refrain from interfering as in the case of the Medical Freedom Amendment.
     Freedom typically refers to the absence of constraints or restrictions. It's the liberty to act without interference or restriction from the government or others. Freedom is broad and focuses on what a person is allowed to do, are entitled to receive, or how others must behave towards you. Freedom allows you to exercise autonomy in certain areas of your life without interference or barriers and it does so without imposing obligations on others.
     For example, Freedom of speech means you are free to express your opinions without censorship or restraint, subject to legal limits. Often the example of limitation of speech is if someone screams fire in a theater to panic people when there is no fire present. Freedom is a guaranteed specific freedom and becomes balanced with collective rights.
     This collective right in the Medical Freedom Amendment may mean quarantine or hospitalization for public safety. Here we have the necessity of courts balancing competing rights and freedoms, especially when the exercise of one person’s freedom might infringe on another’s right. In other words body autonomy puts another person at risk to become sick.
     The Medical Freedom Amendment makes allowance for these special situations to protect public health and ensures that such actions must meet certain criteria to also protect a person’s freedom of autonomy. In this case, the Medical Freedom Amendment states the need for “individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
     Warrants can be issued for many things. For example, a Bench Warrant for speeding can be made only for the person speeding, not for everyone driving a car. Making sure the warrant is both specific and individual means no warrant can be made in general or for a group or a community.
     The warrant can only be made for an individual and there must be proven danger and cause to the court. This is an important protection from court warrants. If a mandate is issued it cannot be for everyone, only for a specific individual with proven causes of danger and harm.
     In any medical situation there are so many variables that public health policy may be beneficial for one person and detrimental to another. In every case people need to be treated as individuals and not as statistics. Historically we have seen where such public policies became draconian and abusive resulting in unnecessary harm to others.
     Once again here is the Medical Freedom Amendment:
     "All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.
     Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
      Here's the help you need to make it happen.
   Support the National Health Federation’s Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign to connect with your legislators and aid the lobbying of the NHF. The time is NOW!
-Michael LeVesque-

"Choice" vs. "Intervention" and the Medical Freedom Amendment

9/22/2024

Witnessing the Acts of Betrayal

          Medical dictatorship has grown to the degree that it is now a major disease of society. Dr. Benjamin Rush, the Nation's first Surgeon General and personal physician to George Washington warned "the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship". He stated that the US Constitution required an amendment securing medical freedom, just as there is the requirement for freedom of speech and religion.
      The government has dangerously intervened in medical choice. It has taken on the role of authority over body autonomy and medical options. It is important to comprehend the difference between the legal and philosophical contexts of "choice" and "intervention" that fundamentally have different actions, with distinct implications for autonomy, authority, and external influence.
       Choice is where an individual exercises autonomy without external compulsion, selecting or deciding between alternatives freely and voluntarily. It is a personal decision and an individual's right and free will. It is two parts- the right to full information without censorship and the freedom to say “yes” or “no”. For this to occur legally, the medical profession must provide all relevant information for the individual with a full comprehension of the consequences. Informed Consent is a Rule of Law that protects all aspects of Choice.
       Intervention refers to the act of stepping in or interfering, typically by an external party, to alter, influence, or control a situation. The state, a court, or another party can initiate it to address situations where laws or public interests are at stake. This usually occurs when there is a perceived harm, threat, or need to regulate behavior or conditions.
     Governmental authority allows the regulation of health, safety, and welfare of the public and to intervene in certain cases of child abuse, public safety, or when public policy requires action. This was the rationale used during the recent pandemic imposing quarantines, mandating vaccines, and other actions for the sake of protecting the public. However, our system has a deep flaw of bias towards pharmaceutical drugs.
      Medical interventions occur when individual actions pose risks to others or the broader public interest. This is on an individual basis, when a patient is incapacitated to act or a public health concern arises (e.g., contagious disease). It requires a court or public health authority to mandate treatment or quarantine for the safety of others.
     There was great abuse by the governmental medical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic as revealed later regarding most policies put in place for propaganda and behavior control. These actions of masks, distancing, lockdowns, and “countermeasures” (vaccines) were draconian, abusive, irrational, dangerous and wrong.
     The court system has supported government actions based on emergency powers and immunity powers. Courts acknowledged verbally that decisions based on Federal legislative laws were "egregious" in their application, especially in the actions of parental rights.
       Child protective services in family law may intervene if there is evidence of abuse or neglect, overriding the parents' choices for the child’s safety. To infringe on the medical choices have proven to be draconian and counter intuitive for the health of the child, especially in cases where parents have chosen alternative medical treatments rather than the American Medical Association Standard of Care.
     The Medical Freedom Amendment protects body autonomy as absolute, and any infringement requires an "...individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
     The medical monopoly controlling the health of America has failed and continues to be the largest expense of our government with the worst results. The battles between the different schools of medicine did not result in competition and excellence. Instead in 1910 the Flexner Report began the steady elimination of effective schools of alternative and traditional medicine resulting in the monopoly of allopathic, industrialized medicine based on poisons of pharmaceuticals and radical medical interventions.
        I witnessed the AIDS epidemic grow out of control in San Francisco as pharmaceuticals wiped out so many that could have been saved by the Eclectics of the 1900's and the homeopaths, the osteopaths, the acupuncturists, the nutritionists, the great array of medical knowledge that was not pursued, ignored, and buried.
     Again, over and over, I witnessed the people on multiple medications with several medical doctors not paying attention to each other's prescriptions. The system of today would be different if the two wealthiest men in the world, John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie had not sought control medicine, seeking profits, and destroying competition by closing alternative medical schools and through the government enforce the Flexner Report of 1910. It was the beginning of the tragic decline of medical service to the patient, experimentation at any cost, and chemical coal tar industrialization of medicine.
     I witnessed the great debacle of the so-called Pandemic with its singular, blinded, and twisted mentality that has brought the nation to its knees, now rising again, only to see the government learned nothing, remains arrogant, and ready to do it all over again using the same wrong medical industrial choices and now court authorization for autocratic enforcement.
     Do we need the Medical Freedom Amendment? Do we need to protect each Individual soul from the maligned, shortsighted and wrong decisions of our government's medical interventions? Do we need the protection of Choice? Absolutely! Everyone must have the right to decline medical interventions without retribution.
     If you had known that you were being "countermeasured" as an intervention would you roll up your sleeve for the pharmaceutical profits and experimentation guaranteeing expense of further medical bills? You were lied to, it wasn't a vaccination at all, it was an injection of a "countermeasure".
     You are protected by the Rule of Law of Informed Consent and when you signed the paper to be "countermeasured" did they tell you the truth, the facts, that you were a human experiment, that it could kill or harm you?
     You and every person injected with a "countermeasure" were an experiment straight out of the John Hopkins school of medicine based on the Flexner Report of 1910 that assured the government would remain committed to pharmacology as the only allowable medical intervention.
      Meanwhile, looking for a pharma cure producing major adverse effects that included death. Investors in the Pharma drugs benefit economically at the front end at taxpayers’ expense and the back end as new medical ailments emerge at more costs and suffering. It was not about patient care. It was about single-minded experimentation enhanced by arrogance and censorship. Ethics, morality and justice ignored.
       Here is the Medical Freedom Amendment. It is your Amendment to have for yourself and your family and friends. Make it happen. I know you will.

     "All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.
     Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."

Here's the help you need to make it happen.
Support the National Health Federation’s Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign to connect with your legislators and aid the lobbying of the NHF. The time is NOW!
-Michael LeVesque-

Opportunity and the Presidential Debates

8/14/2024

There is an enormous elephant in the room.

Will any of the Presidential candidates approach the issue or even mention it?

It is interesting to have Kamala Harris running for President of the United States for a couple reasons. The possibility of electing a Black woman as President. I wonder if people really comprehend what that means. In the founding of the constitutional Republic of the United States the actors were all white male landed Gentry which during that time were most white families.

Voting rights were highly restricted to a certain sector of society and a smaller group of electors from each state for the Presidency. That sector has maintained its control and power over the government throughout our history. It has determined all policies and laws for everyone. Changes evolved with the times with universal suffrage producing Representatives from all sectors of life.

“In January 1972 Shirley Chisholm, the first Black woman elected to Congress, appeared at a Baptist Church in Brooklyn and announced her candidacy for President of the United States. Chisholm was a singular force in American politics of the time: her support for civil rights and legal abortion made her a pivotal connection between the interests of African Americans and emerging mostly white, reproductive-rights movement.” New Yorker Magazine, p.9, August 5th, 2024.

Whether you are a Democrat, a Republican, or any other party, one must take close note to the similarities as well as changes taking place with Harris now praised by her party, the Democrats. What is most striking is that during one of Harris’s speeches she made it clear that the government had no place in telling women what to do regarding their pregnancies. What makes this especially important and interesting is the connection such a statement has in relation to medical freedom and body autonomy of every individual regarding government mandates, rules, and regulations.

The greatest implication is that the women's movement towards body autonomy is the continuing movement towards individual autonomy for everyone; that government must not take control of our health. We recognize that control of our health is a personal matter that we as an individual decide or whose parents decide for their children who are underage for all medical decisions.

The government can recommend but it cannot demand except for a special situation with certain qualifiers as specified in the proposed Medical Freedom Amendment. What we see is that State and Supreme court rulings have upheld the egregious government mandates which are in violation of our inalienable rights of medical freedom and the Rule of Law of Informed Consent.

There are people who oppose all abortion for any reason and others who have qualifiers. Either way this is not an issue for the government to take on. It is a matter of science and medicine balanced with body autonomy. The issue of individual inalienable rights, body autonomy, and medical freedom rights are the important issue and should be absolute.

The women’s movement is that ultimate link that Medical Freedom must be honored. A person's personal beliefs and how they manage their health is an individual matter and not one for the government to decide. It is a matter of a medical decision with advice of the doctor and the decision of the pregnant woman. Medical choice is for the preservation of life and its success.

Medical Freedom protects the medical choice of the mother and the health of the fetus. With the advice of the woman’s health care provider, she makes her decision. It is outside the role of government.

This brings us to the true enormous elephant in the room, COVID-19. This is what the government doesn't want to discuss, and for good reason. It seeks to hide true facts. It was a complete error of mismanagement and wrong decisions. We have legislative acts (The Patriot's Act and the the PREP Act) that took away medical freedom. In so doing, it set the stage to take away even more freedom. The government through its manipulation by extreme wealth of international corporations has used medicine in both a conspiratorial way and a totalitarian way to control individual health, behavior, choice, and control travel, banking, livelihood, education, agriculture, medical practice, alternative therapies, and a multitude of other things.

The COVID-19 pandemic has created a series of wrong decisions and has empowered government propaganda as facts while hiding true information. It has created extreme censorship, extortion, bribery and a host of other egregious acts against we the citizens and the medical and science professionals of the United States. It enabled the roll out of 5G with its 3,000 wave lengths, without debate, affecting all living organisms as scientifically shown to affect life at its deepest levels of RNA and DNA which gets expressed as a myriad of diseases.

We must address this issue publicly and confront it in the current debates for the Presidency. Medical freedom is the most intimate, critical issue of the American people and our representative government should not obfuscate and deny protection. This is an opportunity to address the grave mistakes of the last four years, to display all the lies and dispossessions. We must have confrontation of the explicit and widely recognized policies of censorship, abuse, injustice, and betrayal. We cannot allow the future to be a lifetime filled with despotism, tyranny, and feudalism. The government must confront this now. People are suffering and dying.

Let us demand the Presidential debates address Medical Freedom so we have a clear comprehension of where each candidate draws the line or endorses the Medical Freedom Amendment. We witness Harris promoting medical freedom for women and Trump advocating reduction of government overreach and against mandates. Will they each argue their position only, or will they come together for the benefit of the nation, and both endorse the Medical Freedom Amendment? What would be the outcome if Robert F. Kenned, Jr. were allowed to participate after having fallen from grace because he was against the COVID shots?

This is your opportunity to demand the Presidential candidates address this issue that affects every one of us!

Here is the fully updated Medical Freedom Amendment. This is the definitive, certain, and complete way to expel the government’s tyranny and despotism over our body autonomy and secure our medical freedom and informed consent. We must pass this amendment as the 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.

Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."

Support the National Health Federation’s Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign to connect with your legislators and aid the lobbying of the NHF. The time is NOW!
-Michael LeVesque-

Protect Medical Freedom Now!

7/21/2024

Is this the end of Medical Freedom through the Courts?

The United States Supreme Court has ruled against Medical Freedom. On June 24, 2024 the Supreme Court rejected appeals brought over COVID-19 vaccines by the Children’s Health Defense (CHD), a nonprofit founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an independent candidate running for president.

The court rejected an appeal seeking to overturn lower court rulings that said CHD and its members lacked standing to sue the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over its emergency authorizations of COVID-19 vaccines for minors. In essence, the US Supreme Court denied debate to allow citizens a day in court.

It issued a clever, tricky response that states the problem that once existed brought on by the government was rescinded by the government recently because the mandates ended, making the issue moot. Moot means it is of no practical importance, irrelevant, and not presenting an open legal question. In essence, it's not debatable. The Court says the issue has been resolved because the government stopped mandating and there is no genuine case.

To demonstrate the illogical position. Let's suppose the Federal tax for this year was rescinded and you owed money for the previous year. You will not pay for last year because the law is no longer in force. Try it, and see how far you get with the IRS and the court system.

For all of those cases which went before the Lower Courts there was considered a true abdication of justice. There was financial and employment hardships and medical harm and death. Look at the chart below for the statistics suffered to minors This is unpardonable. There is and was a clear and obvious denial of constitutional rights and devastating harm. The people bringing the law suits had proof of harm. It is frightening to see the US Supreme Court fail in its duty and not consider the case upon its merits. Instead the court side swiped everyone by saying, "It doesn't matter anymore." it's all moot because the government isn't doing it anymore and therefore irrelevant. End of discussion and all your suffering- well too bad.

As a result no case precedents have been given to uphold our constitutional rights! This is what one can call conspiratorial. The balance of power no longer exists when the court steps up to the plate to protect the Executive Branch of government from accountability.This keeps the government's door wide open to issue repressive mandates.

These mandates did allow fear to take over the Nation and produce a country now deep in the pain of overcoming the bad effects of a "countermeasure" that was propagandized as a "vaccine". Even now people are still so attached to the media's past messages that they cannot comprehend the depth of the deceit, conspiracy, disenfranchisement, and abuse suffered by so many.

The increased harm to people of all ages is not reported in the general media. It is like all medical issues that should not happen but do. It is personal and hidden, not shared except among loved ones. Many of us know someone who has died recently most unexpectedly. Insurance companies know it and they are alarmed. Italy recently decided to re-evaluate the number of deaths from COVID-19 and found themselves reducing the number by 95%. When will this country share the facts? COVID-19 was like the flu season and for many wrongly handled and resulting in unnecessary death according to German authorities

Japan looked at the results of the "vaccinations" and came away angry by the enormous increase of death afterwards to the vaccinated.This country needs to do the same and it also has to come to terms with VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Report System) statistics.

So here we our. Is the government's course aimed to end Medical Freedom? It appears that way, especially with our involvement with the World Health Organization's new amendments!

Can we stop this and protect our inalienable rights? Yes. The National Health Federation has now committed itself to the passage of the Medical Freedom Amendment. How difficult is that? Very, very difficult. Why? When you want the government to do something as a special interest it involves some people. When you want to provide something that protects everyone, that 's a major grand project that involves everyone.

To my great gratitude, the National Health Federation has taken on this task and is the spearhead for its enactment. Here is one of the first steps through the NHF outreach and lobbying powers. Notify your Representatives in Congress using this simple NHF-MFA campaign.

The NHF is unwavering in its pursuit to make it a reality. With your efforts, support and donations to the National Health Federation (NHF) we embark upon this great political necessity of our times. This is the addition to our Bill of Rights that definitively protects our Medical Freedom by this Amendment to the US Constitution.

Now, more than ever, your support is necessary to spread the word, bring in new people, and financially support the NHF's long established fight to protect our health. I shall continue to keep you abreast of events and my Blog shall continue here. Thank you for your overwhelming support for this project.

Due to the dangerous relationship the United States government has with the World Health Organization (WHO), the Amendment now includes defense from the dangerous destruction of medical freedom by the WHO's recent actions (see the chart below).

Here is the Medical Freedom Amendment 28...pass it on...

"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose.
Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies
or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive,
emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes
the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom
of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not
apply in any way to this amendment."

"Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental
Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive,
emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes
the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific
judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect
Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."

Here is the link to our State and National campaign to your Legislators. Please use it
now and let us all move forward to securing medical freedom.
https://thenhf.com/pass-the-medical-freedom-amendment.

-Michael LeVesque-

Archives

November 2025
October 2025
September 2025
August 2025
July 2025
June 2025
May 2025
April 2025
March 2025
February 2025
January 2025
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022

Michael LeVesque

Webmaster and Gatekeeper,
Board Member of the National Health Federation

We have no marketing or promotional materials - only the Broadcast.