Medical Freedom Attacked by the Court System
"Bait and Switch"
Medical Freedom is the most important issue of this election period.
Who will defend it, who will deny it, who doesn't care. Better find out, your health depends on it.
The Headline:
“NC Court Rules Federal PREP Act Protects
Forced Vaccination Without Parental Approval"
The North Carolina Court of Appeals has ruled against a mother and son who sued the Guilford County school board and the Old North State Medical Society over a 14-year-old boy's forced COVID-19 vaccination. This ruling was March 5th, 2024.
The vaccination occurred without parental consent and against the boy’s consent and wishes. The Old North State Medical Society forced the son to receive the Pfizer/BioNTech Comirnaty COVID shot. He had come only to be tested for COVID. The court acknowledged that the intent of the state law is to protect bodily autonomy and parental rights, and that the violation suffered by the plaintiffs by being forced to take the shot against his wishes was outrageous and "egregious".
North Carolina state law provides that “a health care provider shall obtain written consent from a parent or legal guardian prior to administering any vaccine that has been granted emergency use authorization and is not yet fully approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to an individual under 18 years of age,”
Nevertheless, the Appeals Court reached a unanimous “egregious” decision against the mother and son taking away the boy’s personal inalienable medical freedom, requirement of parental consent, and body autonomy. What was the Court of Appeals mentality to defile justice?
The state statute, according to the Court, was preempted by the federal act of Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act of 1905 (PREP Act). The court concluded that the Guilford Board of Education, which hosted the clinic, was not at fault. They based this on three others out of state cases. We witness the growth of case precedents to remove State’s authority over medicine as provided by the 10th amendment to the United States Constitution.
The boy had attended a free testing center for COVID since he had been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 virus and needed clearance to attend football practice. The letter informing him of the clinic stated, “consent for testing is required.”
However, testing and vaccination are two different things. (another Bait and Switch)
There was no body autonomy, no parental consent, no personal consent, no protection by state law, no informed consent, a misleading statement of consent and force used to give the "vaccination". This is wrong.
Informed Consent is a Rule of Law which means that it cannot be pre-empted nor is it conditional by the passage of any law denying it. Therefore, there are no conditions restraining its actions. Informed consent goes hand in hand with medical choice. One cannot make a medical choice without informed consent.
The court case also includes battery charges. This determination means that the PREP Act can include a physically forced “countermeasure” (switch), called a “vaccination" (bait). What were our legislators thinking when they passed this affront and denial of freedom? Are we seeing our legislators’ naked
behavior of insouciance? What other things could a “countermeasure“ include in the future? It could mean whatever the government proclaims. Government cannot be trusted and its purpose is to protect our freedom.
The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) states explicitly that any other law to the contrary is subject to the PREP Act as stated:
Subject to the other provisions of this section, a covered person shall be immune from suit and liability under Federal and State law with respect to all claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a covered countermeasure if a declaration under subsection (b) has been issued with respect to such countermeasure.
The PREP Act provides tyranny, despotism and medical enslavement. The PREP act goes even further by giving immunity to any “covered person” and who may that be in the future? Who can do what to whom? What other rights we hold dear are in danger and easily ignored and by whom without recourse?
Where did this term "countermeasure" originate? It is under the USA Patriot Act of 2001 which was over 500+ pages long and introduced the very next day after the 9/11 Twin Towers terrorist act. This is why the Medical Freedom Amendment includes the term “countermeasure”. We now know the COVID-19 shots were not “vaccinations”, they were "countermeasures".
The USA government approved the multitude of experimental injections as military anti-terrorist “countermeasures” in the form of technological computerized formulas of a modified RNA spike in a sea of chemicals foreign to our bodies, actually a genetically modified organism (GMO), under authority of the USA Patriot Act of 2001, and the PREP Act of 2005 to function as a military response with immunity from liability.
Did you know that the Pfizer shots listed hundreds of side-effects (bad-effects) prior to approval? Were you ever told that? Of course you weren’t, and that means you were denied Informed Consent.
The USA Patriot Act of 2001 was not conceived, hopefully, to expose the entire population to the tyranny of government over our medical freedom to allow an international corporate pharmaceutical monopoly give siege on the treasury of the United States and an attack by experimentation upon United States citizens. If this act is conceived as a weapon against us, we the citizens, then it is a criminal act. It now appears to be that.
The results have been devastating as direct evidence from the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) government reporting system demonstrates at the Government’s website and the graph at the end of this Blog.. The pandemic was a dark moment of deception in numerous ways.
And yes, the "countermeasure" is an "emergency use authorization”. The State has every right to negate the Federal law by Constitutional authority. The court ruled wrong. No "egregious" act should be enforced by any court anywhere.
The court by its ruling has unanimously enforced dictatorship and destroyed medical freedom for this young person, and in so doing, dissolved state's rights over medical freedom.
Will this case be appealed? What would the United States Supreme Court rule? Will the court look at our inalienable rights under the Constitution as it is intended? Will it give the Government absolute rule over our medical freedom because of potential future perceived health problem narratives? Will reason and justice rule?
"Countermeasure", through trickery of terminology (bait and switch) as a "vaccination", allowed medical experimentation fast tracked as a military weapon against the illusive terrorist virus that utilized a limited medical arsenal of the Pharmaceutical International Corporations under the 1910 Flexner Report influence that ensures allopathic monopoly and forbade any other more effective therapeutic solutions for a questionable epidemic. For example, Italy recently reviewed their numbers and reduced the deaths due to COVID-19 by over 90%. When will we review the lies?
The government endorsed this activity and laid its groundwork. It then incentivized hospitals and doctors to endorse its actions. It destroyed small businesses that act independently, while allowing corporations to maintain business since they easily institute behavior. This was a government coup against the people in the name of salvation.
Can we trust our government to uphold our medical freedom without enacting the Medical Freedom Amendment? The answer is simple – NO. The risk is too great, and experience requires enactment.
Now we face impending danger from the World Health Organization in the form of international treaties and agreements. Scott Tips, President of the National Health Federation, made this point to me recently as expressed in Article VI of the United States Constitution. These terms and wording of Scott are added to fully protect our inalienable rights from tyranny, despotism and dictatorship under all circumstances.
The Medical Freedom Amendment is a national call for public participation to build a wall of defense for our most human and intimate freedom. We are in a state of crisis approaching a perfect storm that will produce apocalyptic results. We require leadership that will endorse the amendment in its full stature and renew the commitment to medical freedom and body autonomy.
Here is the recently amended Medical Freedom Amendment:
"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.
Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
The Medical Freedom Amendment videos are on YouTube and the MFA blog March 2024 at MedicalFreedomAmendment.org in several languages – Spanish, French, German, Portuguese, and Italian.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-h2K-8HUvU
Join the National Health Federation. Take part in supporting the Medical Freedom Amendment. Go to Campaigns at https://thenhf.com/pass-the-medical-freedom-amendment/
The NHF Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign
-Michael LeVesque-
The vaccination occurred without parental consent and against the boy’s consent and wishes. The Old North State Medical Society forced the son to receive the Pfizer/BioNTech Comirnaty COVID shot. He had come only to be tested for COVID. The court acknowledged that the intent of the state law is to protect bodily autonomy and parental rights, and that the violation suffered by the plaintiffs by being forced to take the shot against his wishes was outrageous and "egregious".
North Carolina state law provides that “a health care provider shall obtain written consent from a parent or legal guardian prior to administering any vaccine that has been granted emergency use authorization and is not yet fully approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to an individual under 18 years of age,”
Nevertheless, the Appeals Court reached a unanimous “egregious” decision against the mother and son taking away the boy’s personal inalienable medical freedom, requirement of parental consent, and body autonomy. What was the Court of Appeals mentality to defile justice?
The state statute, according to the Court, was preempted by the federal act of Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act of 1905 (PREP Act). The court concluded that the Guilford Board of Education, which hosted the clinic, was not at fault. They based this on three others out of state cases. We witness the growth of case precedents to remove State’s authority over medicine as provided by the 10th amendment to the United States Constitution.
The boy had attended a free testing center for COVID since he had been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 virus and needed clearance to attend football practice. The letter informing him of the clinic stated, “consent for testing is required.”
However, testing and vaccination are two different things. (another Bait and Switch)
There was no body autonomy, no parental consent, no personal consent, no protection by state law, no informed consent, a misleading statement of consent and force used to give the "vaccination". This is wrong.
Informed Consent is a Rule of Law which means that it cannot be pre-empted nor is it conditional by the passage of any law denying it. Therefore, there are no conditions restraining its actions. Informed consent goes hand in hand with medical choice. One cannot make a medical choice without informed consent.
The court case also includes battery charges. This determination means that the PREP Act can include a physically forced “countermeasure” (switch), called a “vaccination" (bait). What were our legislators thinking when they passed this affront and denial of freedom? Are we seeing our legislators’ naked
behavior of insouciance? What other things could a “countermeasure“ include in the future? It could mean whatever the government proclaims. Government cannot be trusted and its purpose is to protect our freedom.
The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) states explicitly that any other law to the contrary is subject to the PREP Act as stated:
Subject to the other provisions of this section, a covered person shall be immune from suit and liability under Federal and State law with respect to all claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a covered countermeasure if a declaration under subsection (b) has been issued with respect to such countermeasure.
The PREP Act provides tyranny, despotism and medical enslavement. The PREP act goes even further by giving immunity to any “covered person” and who may that be in the future? Who can do what to whom? What other rights we hold dear are in danger and easily ignored and by whom without recourse?
Where did this term "countermeasure" originate? It is under the USA Patriot Act of 2001 which was over 500+ pages long and introduced the very next day after the 9/11 Twin Towers terrorist act. This is why the Medical Freedom Amendment includes the term “countermeasure”. We now know the COVID-19 shots were not “vaccinations”, they were "countermeasures".
The USA government approved the multitude of experimental injections as military anti-terrorist “countermeasures” in the form of technological computerized formulas of a modified RNA spike in a sea of chemicals foreign to our bodies, actually a genetically modified organism (GMO), under authority of the USA Patriot Act of 2001, and the PREP Act of 2005 to function as a military response with immunity from liability.
Did you know that the Pfizer shots listed hundreds of side-effects (bad-effects) prior to approval? Were you ever told that? Of course you weren’t, and that means you were denied Informed Consent.
The USA Patriot Act of 2001 was not conceived, hopefully, to expose the entire population to the tyranny of government over our medical freedom to allow an international corporate pharmaceutical monopoly give siege on the treasury of the United States and an attack by experimentation upon United States citizens. If this act is conceived as a weapon against us, we the citizens, then it is a criminal act. It now appears to be that.
The results have been devastating as direct evidence from the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) government reporting system demonstrates at the Government’s website and the graph at the end of this Blog.. The pandemic was a dark moment of deception in numerous ways.
And yes, the "countermeasure" is an "emergency use authorization”. The State has every right to negate the Federal law by Constitutional authority. The court ruled wrong. No "egregious" act should be enforced by any court anywhere.
The court by its ruling has unanimously enforced dictatorship and destroyed medical freedom for this young person, and in so doing, dissolved state's rights over medical freedom.
Will this case be appealed? What would the United States Supreme Court rule? Will the court look at our inalienable rights under the Constitution as it is intended? Will it give the Government absolute rule over our medical freedom because of potential future perceived health problem narratives? Will reason and justice rule?
"Countermeasure", through trickery of terminology (bait and switch) as a "vaccination", allowed medical experimentation fast tracked as a military weapon against the illusive terrorist virus that utilized a limited medical arsenal of the Pharmaceutical International Corporations under the 1910 Flexner Report influence that ensures allopathic monopoly and forbade any other more effective therapeutic solutions for a questionable epidemic. For example, Italy recently reviewed their numbers and reduced the deaths due to COVID-19 by over 90%. When will we review the lies?
The government endorsed this activity and laid its groundwork. It then incentivized hospitals and doctors to endorse its actions. It destroyed small businesses that act independently, while allowing corporations to maintain business since they easily institute behavior. This was a government coup against the people in the name of salvation.
Can we trust our government to uphold our medical freedom without enacting the Medical Freedom Amendment? The answer is simple – NO. The risk is too great, and experience requires enactment.
Now we face impending danger from the World Health Organization in the form of international treaties and agreements. Scott Tips, President of the National Health Federation, made this point to me recently as expressed in Article VI of the United States Constitution. These terms and wording of Scott are added to fully protect our inalienable rights from tyranny, despotism and dictatorship under all circumstances.
The Medical Freedom Amendment is a national call for public participation to build a wall of defense for our most human and intimate freedom. We are in a state of crisis approaching a perfect storm that will produce apocalyptic results. We require leadership that will endorse the amendment in its full stature and renew the commitment to medical freedom and body autonomy.
Here is the recently amended Medical Freedom Amendment:
"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.
Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
The Medical Freedom Amendment videos are on YouTube and the MFA blog March 2024 at MedicalFreedomAmendment.org in several languages – Spanish, French, German, Portuguese, and Italian.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-h2K-8HUvU
Join the National Health Federation. Take part in supporting the Medical Freedom Amendment. Go to Campaigns at https://thenhf.com/pass-the-medical-freedom-amendment/
The NHF Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign
-Michael LeVesque-
RSS Feed
