28th Medical Freedom Amendment
POST IN
  • Home
  • Call to Action
  • Blog
  • Q&A
  • Petition
  • Questionnaire
  • Representative Letter

Facts and Freedom

12/12/2024

0 Comments

 

The Real Facts and the Election

Picture
      Regardless of what the political pundits say, the election results were from something much deeper that we experienced as a whole and as a Nation. Over the COVID-19 debacle the media whipped us into a frenzy of fear and desperation by controlled propaganda. It now demonstrates gaping holes of reason and soundness looking back. The political, economic, and health narratives were manipulation and propaganda by a mass media government campaign.
     The results that emerged are the destruction of medical freedom, medical sanity, and the health of the Nation. It also divided the Nation between believers and non-believers. Meanwhile massive suffering by both groups took place. The confusion and distrust produced an electorate that recognized we had been deceived, misled, bluffed, hoodwinked, and hoaxed.
     There was enough of that electorate to say we will determine the election. Once the Republicans accepted Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and denied by the Democrats, the election results were determined and delivered.
      People were angry witnessing the denial of a fair hearing of different narratives regarding all the events that took place with COVID-19. They also came to comprehend the World Health Organization’s power to determine our sovereign rights to body autonomy and Informed Consent. The anger grew as families lost beloved healthy members to an outdated medical system controlled and propagandized by the Pharmaceutical Industry.
     Informed Consent is a Rule of Law which means that it cannot be pre-empted nor is it conditional by the passage of any law denying it. Therefore, there are no conditions restraining its actions. Informed consent goes hand in hand with medical choice. One cannot make a medical choice without informed consent.
      Did you know that the Pfizer shots listed hundreds of side-effects (bad effects – there can only be good or bad effects) prior to approval? Were you ever told that? Of course you were not, and that means you were denied your Informed Consent.
      Our government must protect our society and it failed by denying the open discussion of medical therapeutics and analysis of scientific observations. It then incurred the greatest egregious actions against We, the people. It denied informed consent. It colluded through past legislative acts to deny justice and a reckoning of the injustices and abuses.
      It did this by authority of the USA Patriot Act of 2001, and the PREP Act of 2005 to function as a military response with immunity from liability. This legislation brought our Nation to its knees. Courts egregiously adhered to these laws, further denying children the protection of their parents.
      However, there are elections and change takes place. How great the change will depend on the will of a few and the cognizance of the many.
      Now more than ever is our opportunity to protect our freedom and our health. This can only occur in an open society and a responsible government. Medical freedom is an inalienable right and guaranteed to every person through a constitutional amendment.
      Once accomplished, we must eliminate medical propaganda and advertising. We need to insure medical and scientific intellectual freedom. We need to bring medicine into the vast world of healing offered by many other modes.
      WE are in a crisis now. The facts portend a deepening of that crisis unless we act now. Here are some facts. In 2022 we spent 4.5 trillion dollars on health care greater than the military budget. That is equal to $13,000.00 per person. The CDC (Center for Disease Control) reported 3.8 chronic diseases in person’s who died from COVID-19. Statistics show 50% of the population as obese or overweight.- compare that with Japan which has 3%. One out of three children are diabetic, and 18% of teens have liver dysfunction. Meanwhile, 47% of advertising revenues in the media are from pharmaceutical ads.
      As Abraham Lincoln said, “I am a firm believer in the people. If given the truth, they can be depended upon to meet any national crisis. The great point is to bring them the real facts.”
      This determined the outcome of the election. Deep inside people knew there must be change. Lincoln’s words are literal and a foundation for our democratic livelihood. People must have the real facts! This is what RFK, Jr. based his goals.
      In repeating the Amendment, I hope you will eventually know it by heart and can discuss it with each other. The Medical Freedom Amendment should absolutely be the prime goal of every nation to protect its people’s health.
      "All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.
      Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
      The Medical Freedom Amendment videos are on YouTube and the MFA blog March 2024 at MedicalFreedomAmendment.org in several languages – Spanish, French, German, Portuguese, and Italian.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-h2K-8HUvU
     Join the National Health Federation. Take part in supporting the Medical Freedom Amendment. Go to Campaigns at https://thenhf.com/pass-the-medical-freedom-amendment/
The NHF Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign
-Michael LeVesque-
0 Comments

Medical Freedom & Parental Consent Destroyed

11/18/2024

0 Comments

 

Medical Freedom and Parental Consent Destroyed

Picture
      This is the most disturbing Blog to share. It reports bias and ignorance of such depth and despotic behavior that allowed to continue will be the end of government by the people, for the people, of the people. Only a massive rejection of these egregious actions can save us, More than ever we need the protections of parental rights and medical freedom from interference by a government that no longer thinks and acts rationally.
     As one will witnesses attacks on medical freedom by the many people in power and especially in the Court system how can justice prevail? These action demonstrate that parental rights have disappeared and children have become property of the State. These court decisions are being repeated in other States. It is essential to comprehend the impact and dangers for the future and must be shared as much as possible. This first example is general.
     There are currently cases in the US where our government has kidnapped children because of medical choices and or procedures about which the child may or may not disagree with their parents, or the hospital disagrees with the parent's decision which prefers a different treatment not recognized by the standard of care of the hospital. This denial of informed consent and medical freedom is egregious and destructive of many rights and freedom.
        Here is some advice to all parents.
      The greatest loss of medical rights is usually signed away when people are offered forms and the person signs them without reading and editing in blue ink.  Any medical form offered should be read and where necessary include medical rights protection added where necessary. Medical interventions occur when people sign their rights over to the hospital or doctor usually unknowingly.
     Beware giving away your medical rights! When forms are edited properly, the hospital and staff will treat you differently and respectfully. They do not want to be sued. Require informed consent for all medical interventions. This is an excellent article for direction on this issue by Dr. Andrew Kaufman.
     The Medical Freedom Amendment needs to be purposely broad and clear to cover all threats and abuses possible - which are numerous, unpredictable, and unforeseeable. Its passage is necessary during these times, proven by past actions and in grave danger in the future.
     Medical choice includes medical intervention which requires medical choice and informed consent. As with the First Amendment, it is short and broad. To be clear, the most important part of the Amendment is the first sentence: "All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose."
     In the case of parental rights, informed consent requires that the person giving consent not only is fully informed, they are also capable of comprehending the full meaning of any medical procedure, comprehending its ramifications and outcome. Children are not of that age. They come under the sole protection and decision of the parents. This is the case unless a legal warrant meeting all the conditions of the Medical Freedom Amendment requirements to issue a warrant as stated in the second paragraph of the Amendment are met. This necessary protection has recently been denied by the government at all levels - legislative, executive, and judicial and actions were taken without parental consent or warrant. See the Blog for specific details of this struggle.
     Those requirements of the Medical Freedom Amendment's warrant are "individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents." ALL OF THESE CONDITIONS MUST BE MET  BEFORE A MEDICAL INTERVENTION CAN OCCUR at any level of control and especially for a child one must prove that this action is required to protect society from harm which is rarely the case.
     According to a decision made by the Vermont Supreme Court, the government is able to inject kids with experimental products — even if the father and mother do not give their permission. The court, like the Supreme Court of South Carolina made an egregious decision validating the outdated Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act. The Court never addressed privacy protections under state or federal law nor matters of bodily autonomy. This case involved a six year old boy who was forcibly taken from the classroom without calling parents and given a COVID-19 "countermeasure" called a vaccination under duress.
     Attorney John Klar reported, "“…acting ‘under color’ of Vermont law – and cloaked in its authority, took L.P. from his seat in class, and while L.P.protested, escorted him to the clinic.
“This action deprived L.P., and, derivatively, his parents, of their Article 11 right to be free in their persons from unreasonable seizure by agents of the State, without due process.
“[School officials] then injected L.P. with an experimental substance, while they held him in place. They did it without consent, while L.P. protested what they were doing to him. 
“This act deprived L.P., and, derivatively, his parents, of their Article 11 right to be free from intrusion into their bodily integrity by agents of the State, without due process.”
     One need not be an attorney to see that what was done to this child by a government authority was every parent’s worst nightmare. If that nightmare could be made worse, it would be by a state court system that denied any relief to the family: a court system that sided absolutely with the federal government and a large corporate manufacturer at the expense of all Vermont children’s rights!
     Such rights to our children’s safety can never be abrogated by any court in this land. Fundamental liberties are ‘inalienable’ by any government action including federal statute (including the PREP Act), and regardless of whether Vermont’s highest court can comprehend that this is the Supreme law of this land."
     READ IN APP for much more detail and significance to this case.
     The federal PREP Act makes no reference to parental consent. It has left that to the courts which are destroying longstanding, essential medical rights of parents and informed consent, and unreasonable seizure. This was an act of force against the will of a child under age, without parental consent, who could not physically fight back and was forcibly injected with a genetically modified organism that is also proven experimental, harmful, and dangerous.
     It is not a vaccine. It is government approved injections as anti-terrorists’ “countermeasure” in the form of technological computerized formulas in a sea of chemicals foreign to our bodies of a genetically modified organism under authority of the Patriot Act of 2001, and the PREP Act of 2005 to function as a military response with immunity of liability. The PREP Act is no longer active. The most recent analysis of the effects of this injection shows great possible harm.
      Is the State destroying public education by such brutal, barbaric, and draconian actions? What parent can now trust a public government school or public health clinic when seeking help for their child? 
     A 2023 review of academic literature concluded:
“Ethical challenges can arise when vaccines are mandated for all ages, but they increase significantly when mandated for children…
“Children are less susceptible to COVID-19; the disease severity in children is mild, and the potential benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine are low, so mandating vaccines is untenable…
“Mandates imply coercion, which might agitate the reaction towards COVID-19 vaccination and increase anti-vaccination attitudes among the public.”
     My personal interpretation of what is occurring is the realization that we have a government based on fascism. Corporate law has overtaken the Rule of Law. The government is a corporation with stock holders, which includes everyone with a social security number, and the courts are corporations as well with stock holders and they are now meting out decisions based on legal corporate law that are feudal, oppressive, undemocratic, authoritarian based on corporate legislative acts and the denial of the Rule of Law. We are in Feudal fascism.
     These decisions are egregious and frighteningly displaying the denial of freedom and rights in this country. The United States has become a colony to corporate wealth that feeds off the wealth of the general public. We are constantly reminded of the dangers of Communism and ignore the dangers of Fascism. It is time to recognize this insidious change that has taken place.
     This is destruction of freedom and rights that is so abusive that one's anger must be tempered so as not to do something foolish in response. However, there must be a response to hold all parties responsible and legally at fault through some means or another. Rebellion for such acts requires organization and management.
     The Medical Freedom Amendment can provide that coming together and organized rebellion against those striking down freedom and rights.
     "All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.
     Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
      Here's the help you need to make it happen.
   Support the National Health Federation’s Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign to connect with your legislators and aid the lobbying of the NHF.
The time is NOW!
-Michael LeVesque-
0 Comments

Medical Freedom Amendment - Freedom and Rights

10/31/2024

0 Comments

 

Rights and Freedom under the Medical Freedom Amendment

Picture

     The Medical Freedom Amendment has two terms that are often used interchangeably, but they do have subtle distinctions. For that reason they are included in the wording of the Medical Freedom Amendment. The Amendment states, “the right of medical choice” and “the freedom of medical choice”.
      A right is a legally or morally granted entitlement that imposes an obligation on others to either do something or refrain from doing something. It is enforceable by law, and if violated, the law provides remedies or protections. A specific right involves active duties or prohibitions on the governments and other legal entities, such as courts.
      For example, a fair trial means the government and courts must ensure a person receives a fair judicial process. In the Medical Freedom Amendment, “the right to medical choice” means that governments must protect a person’s medical choice regardless of what it is. This is an active duty required of the government in all its forms to ensure the right is upheld.
     Rights can be positive involving a duty to provide something. It can also be negative imposing a duty on others to refrain from interfering as in the case of the Medical Freedom Amendment.
     Freedom typically refers to the absence of constraints or restrictions. It's the liberty to act without interference or restriction from the government or others. Freedom is broad and focuses on what a person is allowed to do, are entitled to receive, or how others must behave towards you. Freedom allows you to exercise autonomy in certain areas of your life without interference or barriers and it does so without imposing obligations on others.
     For example, Freedom of speech means you are free to express your opinions without censorship or restraint, subject to legal limits. Often the example of limitation of speech is if someone screams fire in a theater to panic people when there is no fire present. Freedom is a guaranteed specific freedom and becomes balanced with collective rights.
     This collective right in the Medical Freedom Amendment may mean quarantine or hospitalization for public safety. Here we have the necessity of courts balancing competing rights and freedoms, especially when the exercise of one person’s freedom might infringe on another’s right. In other words body autonomy puts another person at risk to become sick.
     The Medical Freedom Amendment makes allowance for these special situations to protect public health and ensures that such actions must meet certain criteria to also protect a person’s freedom of autonomy. In this case, the Medical Freedom Amendment states the need for “individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
     Warrants can be issued for many things. For example, a Bench Warrant for speeding can be made only for the person speeding, not for everyone driving a car. Making sure the warrant is both specific and individual means no warrant can be made in general or for a group or a community.
     The warrant can only be made for an individual and there must be proven danger and cause to the court. This is an important protection from court warrants. If a mandate is issued it cannot be for everyone, only for a specific individual with proven causes of danger and harm.
     In any medical situation there are so many variables that public health policy may be beneficial for one person and detrimental to another. In every case people need to be treated as individuals and not as statistics. Historically we have seen where such public policies became draconian and abusive resulting in unnecessary harm to others.
     Once again here is the Medical Freedom Amendment:
     "All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.
     Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
      Here's the help you need to make it happen.
   Support the National Health Federation’s Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign  to connect with your legislators and aid the lobbying of the NHF. The time is NOW!
-Michael LeVesque-

0 Comments

"Choice" vs. "Intervention" and the Medical Freedom Amendment

9/22/2024

0 Comments

 

Witnessing the Acts of Betrayal

Picture
          Medical dictatorship has grown to the degree that it is now a major disease of society. Dr. Benjamin Rush, the Nation's first Surgeon General and personal physician to George Washington warned "the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship". He stated that the US Constitution required an amendment securing medical freedom, just as there is the requirement for freedom of speech and religion.
       The government has dangerously intervened in medical choice. It has taken on the role of authority over body autonomy and medical options. It is important to comprehend the difference between the legal and philosophical contexts of "choice" and "intervention" that fundamentally have different actions, with distinct implications for autonomy, authority, and external influence.
       Choice is where an individual exercises autonomy without external compulsion, selecting or deciding between alternatives freely and voluntarily. It is a personal decision and an individual's right and free will. It is two parts- the right to full information without censorship and the freedom to say “yes” or “no”. For this to occur legally, the medical profession must provide all relevant information for the individual with a full comprehension of the consequences. Informed Consent is a Rule of Law that protects all aspects of Choice.
        Intervention refers to the act of stepping in or interfering, typically by an external party, to alter, influence, or control a situation. The state, a court, or another party can initiate it to address situations where laws or public interests are at stake. This usually occurs when there is a perceived harm, threat, or need to regulate behavior or conditions.
     Governmental authority allows the regulation of health, safety, and welfare of the public and to intervene in certain cases of child abuse, public safety, or when public policy requires action. This was the rationale used during the recent pandemic imposing quarantines, mandating vaccines, and other actions for the sake of protecting the public. However, our system has a deep flaw of bias towards pharmaceutical drugs.
      Medical interventions occur when individual actions pose risks to others or the broader public interest. This is on an individual basis, when a patient is incapacitated to act or a public health concern arises (e.g., contagious disease). It requires a court or public health authority to mandate treatment or quarantine for the safety of others.
     There was great abuse by the governmental medical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic as revealed later regarding most policies put in place for propaganda and behavior control. These actions of masks, distancing, lockdowns, and “countermeasures” (vaccines) were draconian, abusive, irrational, dangerous and wrong.
     The court system has supported government actions based on emergency powers and immunity powers. Courts acknowledged verbally that decisions based on Federal legislative laws were "egregious" in their application, especially in the actions of parental rights.
       Child protective services in family law may intervene if there is evidence of abuse or neglect, overriding the parents' choices for the child’s safety. To infringe on the medical choices have proven to be draconian and counter intuitive for the health of the child, especially in cases where parents have chosen alternative medical treatments rather than the American Medical Association Standard of Care.
     The Medical Freedom Amendment protects body autonomy as absolute, and any infringement requires an "...individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
     The medical monopoly controlling the health of America has failed and continues to be the largest expense of our government with the worst results. The battles between the different schools of medicine did not result in competition and excellence. Instead in 1910 the Flexner Report began the steady elimination of effective schools of alternative and traditional medicine resulting in the monopoly of allopathic, industrialized medicine based on poisons of pharmaceuticals and radical medical interventions.
        I witnessed the AIDS epidemic grow out of control in San Francisco as pharmaceuticals wiped out so many that could have been saved by the Eclectics of the 1900's and the homeopaths, the osteopaths, the acupuncturists, the nutritionists, the great array of medical knowledge that was not pursued, ignored, and buried.
      Again, over and over, I witnessed the people on multiple medications with several medical doctors not paying attention to each other's prescriptions. The system of today would be different if the two wealthiest men in the world, John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie had not sought control medicine, seeking profits, and destroying competition by closing alternative medical schools and through the government enforce the Flexner Report of 1910. It was the beginning of the tragic decline of medical service to the patient, experimentation at any cost, and chemical coal tar industrialization of medicine.
     I witnessed the great debacle of the so-called Pandemic with its singular, blinded, and twisted mentality that has brought the nation to its knees, now rising again, only to see the government learned nothing, remains arrogant, and ready to do it all over again using the same wrong medical industrial choices and now court authorization for autocratic enforcement.
     Do we need the Medical Freedom Amendment? Do we need to protect each Individual soul from the maligned, shortsighted and wrong decisions of our government's medical interventions? Do we need the protection of Choice? Absolutely! Everyone must have the right to decline medical interventions without retribution.
     If you had known that you were being "countermeasured" as an intervention would you roll up your sleeve for the pharmaceutical profits and experimentation  guaranteeing expense of further medical bills? You were lied to, it wasn't a vaccination at all, it was an injection of a "countermeasure".
     You are protected by the Rule of Law of Informed Consent and when you signed the paper to be "countermeasured" did they tell you the truth, the facts, that you were a human experiment, that it could kill or harm you?
     You and every person injected with a "countermeasure" were an experiment straight out of the John Hopkins school of medicine based on the Flexner Report of 1910 that assured the government would remain committed to pharmacology as the only allowable medical intervention.
      Meanwhile, looking for a pharma cure producing major adverse effects that included death. Investors in the Pharma drugs benefit economically at the front end at taxpayers’ expense and the back end as new medical ailments emerge at more costs and suffering. It was not about patient care. It was about single-minded  experimentation enhanced by arrogance and censorship. Ethics, morality and justice ignored.
       Here is the Medical Freedom Amendment. It is your Amendment to have for yourself and your family and friends. Make it happen. I know you will.

     "All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.
     Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."

Here's the help you need to make it happen.
Support the National Health Federation’s Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign  to connect with your legislators and aid the lobbying of the NHF. The time is NOW!
-Michael LeVesque-
0 Comments

Opportunity and the Presidential Debates

8/14/2024

0 Comments

 

There is an enormous elephant in the room.

Picture
Will any of the Presidential candidates approach the issue or even mention it?

It is interesting to have Kamala Harris running for President of the United States for a couple reasons. The possibility of electing a Black woman as President. I wonder if people really comprehend what that means. In the founding of the constitutional Republic of the United States the actors were all white male landed Gentry which during that time were most white families.

Voting rights were highly restricted to a certain sector of society and a smaller group of electors from each state for the Presidency. That sector has maintained its control and power over the government throughout our history. It has determined all policies and laws for everyone. Changes evolved with the times with universal suffrage producing Representatives from all sectors of life.

“In January 1972 Shirley Chisholm, the first Black woman elected to Congress, appeared at a Baptist Church in Brooklyn and announced her candidacy for President of the United States. Chisholm was a singular force in American politics of the time: her support for civil rights and legal abortion made her a pivotal connection between the interests of African Americans and emerging mostly white, reproductive-rights movement.” New Yorker Magazine, p.9, August 5th, 2024.

Whether you are a Democrat, a Republican, or any other party, one must take close note to the similarities as well as changes taking place with Harris now praised by her party, the Democrats. What is most striking is that during one of Harris’s speeches she made it clear that the government had no place in telling women what to do regarding their pregnancies. What makes this especially important and interesting is the connection such a statement has in relation to medical freedom and body autonomy of every individual regarding government mandates, rules, and regulations.

The greatest implication is that the women's movement towards body autonomy is the continuing movement towards individual autonomy for everyone; that government must not take control of our health. We recognize that control of our health is a personal matter that we as an individual decide or whose parents decide for their children who are underage for all medical decisions.

The government can recommend but it cannot demand except for a special situation with certain qualifiers as specified in the proposed Medical Freedom Amendment. What we see is that State and Supreme court rulings have upheld the egregious government mandates which are in violation of our inalienable rights of medical freedom and the Rule of Law of Informed Consent.

There are people who oppose all abortion for any reason and others who have qualifiers. Either way this is not an issue for the government to take on. It is a matter of science and medicine balanced with body autonomy. The issue of individual inalienable rights, body autonomy, and medical freedom rights are the important issue and should be absolute.

The women’s movement is that ultimate link that Medical Freedom must be honored. A person's personal beliefs and how they manage their health is an individual matter and not one for the government to decide. It is a matter of a medical decision with advice of the doctor and the decision of the pregnant woman. Medical choice is for the preservation of life and its success.

Medical Freedom protects the medical choice of the mother and the health of the fetus. With the advice of the woman’s health care provider, she makes her decision. It is outside the role of government.

This brings us to the true enormous elephant in the room, COVID-19. This is what the government doesn't want to discuss, and for good reason. It seeks to hide true facts.  It was a complete error of mismanagement and wrong decisions. We have legislative acts (The Patriot's Act and the the PREP Act) that took away medical freedom. In so doing, it set the stage to take away even more freedom. The government through its manipulation by extreme wealth of international corporations has used medicine in both a conspiratorial way and a totalitarian way to control individual health, behavior, choice, and control travel, banking, livelihood, education, agriculture, medical practice, alternative therapies, and a multitude of other things.

The COVID-19 pandemic has created a series of wrong decisions and has empowered government propaganda as facts while hiding true information. It has created extreme censorship, extortion, bribery and a host of other egregious acts against we the citizens and the medical and science professionals of the United States. It enabled the roll out of 5G with its 3,000 wave lengths, without debate, affecting all living organisms as scientifically shown to affect life at its deepest levels of RNA and DNA which gets expressed as a myriad of diseases.

We must address this issue publicly and confront it in the current debates for the Presidency. Medical freedom is the most intimate, critical issue of the American people and our representative government should not obfuscate and deny protection. This is an opportunity to address the grave mistakes of the last four years, to display all the lies and dispossessions. We must have confrontation of the explicit and widely recognized policies of censorship, abuse, injustice, and betrayal. We cannot allow the future to be a lifetime filled with despotism, tyranny, and feudalism. The government must confront this now. People are suffering and dying.

Let us demand the Presidential debates address Medical Freedom so we have a clear comprehension of where each candidate draws the line or endorses the Medical Freedom Amendment. We witness Harris promoting medical freedom for women and Trump advocating reduction of government overreach and against mandates. Will they each argue their position only, or will they come together for the benefit of the nation, and both endorse the Medical Freedom Amendment? What would be the outcome if Robert F. Kenned, Jr. were allowed to participate after having fallen from grace because he was against the COVID shots?

This is your opportunity to demand the Presidential candidates address this issue that affects every one of us!

Here is the fully updated Medical Freedom Amendment. This is the definitive, certain, and complete way to expel the government’s tyranny and despotism over our body autonomy and secure our medical freedom and informed consent. We must pass this amendment as the 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.

Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
 
Support the National Health Federation’s Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign  to connect with your legislators and aid the lobbying of the NHF. The time is NOW!
-Michael LeVesque-

0 Comments

Protect Medical Freedom Now!

7/21/2024

0 Comments

 
Picture

Is this the end of Medical Freedom through the Courts?

The United States Supreme Court has ruled against Medical Freedom. On June 24, 2024 the Supreme Court rejected appeals brought over COVID-19 vaccines by the Children’s Health Defense (CHD), a nonprofit founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an independent candidate running for president.

The court rejected an appeal seeking to overturn lower court rulings that said CHD and its members lacked standing to sue the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over its emergency authorizations of COVID-19 vaccines for minors. In essence, the US Supreme Court denied debate to allow citizens a day in court.

It issued a clever, tricky response that states the problem that once existed brought on by the government was rescinded by the government recently because the mandates ended, making the issue moot. Moot means it is of no practical importance, irrelevant, and not presenting an open legal question. In essence, it's not debatable. The Court says the issue has been resolved because the government stopped mandating and there is no genuine case.

To demonstrate the illogical position. Let's suppose the Federal tax for this year was rescinded and you owed money for the previous year. You will not pay for last year because the law is no longer in force. Try it, and see how far you get with the IRS and the court system.

For all of those cases which went before the Lower Courts there was considered a true abdication of justice. There was financial and employment hardships and medical harm and death. Look at the chart below for the statistics suffered to minors This is unpardonable. There is and was a clear and obvious denial of constitutional rights and devastating harm. The people bringing the law suits had proof of harm. It is frightening to see the US Supreme Court fail in its duty and not consider the case upon its merits. Instead the court side swiped everyone by saying, "It doesn't matter anymore." it's all moot because the government isn't doing it anymore and therefore irrelevant. End of discussion and all your suffering- well too bad.

As a result no case precedents have been given to uphold our constitutional rights! This is what one can call conspiratorial. The balance of power no longer exists when the court steps up to the plate to protect the Executive Branch of government from accountability.This keeps the government's door wide open to issue repressive mandates. 

These mandates did allow fear to take over the Nation and produce a country now deep in the pain of overcoming the bad effects of a "countermeasure" that was propagandized as a "vaccine". Even now people are still so attached to the media's past messages that they cannot comprehend the depth of the deceit, conspiracy, disenfranchisement, and abuse suffered by so many.

The increased harm to people of all ages is not reported in the general media. It is like all medical issues that should not happen but do. It is personal and hidden, not shared except among loved ones. Many of us know someone who has died recently most unexpectedly. Insurance companies know it and they are alarmed. Italy recently decided to re-evaluate the number of deaths from COVID-19 and found themselves reducing the number by 95%. When will this country share the facts? COVID-19 was like the flu season and for many wrongly handled and resulting in unnecessary death according to German authorities

Japan looked at the results of the "vaccinations" and came away angry by the enormous increase of death afterwards to the vaccinated.This country needs to do the same and it also has to come to terms with VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Report System) statistics.

So here we our. Is the government's course aimed to end Medical Freedom? It appears that way, especially with our involvement with the World Health Organization's new amendments!

Can we stop this and protect our inalienable rights? Yes. The National Health Federation has now committed itself to the passage of the Medical Freedom Amendment. How difficult is that? Very, very difficult. Why? When you want the government to do something as a special interest it involves some people. When you want to provide something that protects everyone, that 's a major grand project that involves everyone.

To my great gratitude, the National Health Federation has taken on this task and is the spearhead for its enactment. Here is one of the first steps through the NHF outreach and lobbying powers. Notify your Representatives in Congress using this simple NHF-MFA campaign.

The NHF is unwavering in its pursuit to make it a reality. With your efforts, support and donations to the National Health Federation (NHF) we embark upon this great political necessity of our times. This is the addition to our Bill of Rights that definitively protects our Medical Freedom by this Amendment to the US Constitution.

Now, more than ever, your support is necessary to spread the word, bring in new people, and financially support the NHF's long established fight to protect our health. I shall continue to keep you abreast of events and my Blog shall continue here. Thank you for your overwhelming support for this project.

Due to the dangerous relationship the United States government has with the World Health Organization (WHO), the Amendment now includes defense from the dangerous destruction of medical freedom by the WHO's recent actions (see the chart below).

Here is the Medical Freedom Amendment 28...pass it on...

"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose.
Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies
or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive,
emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes
the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom
of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not
apply in any way to this amendment."

"Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental
Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive,
emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes
the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific
judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect
Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."

Here is the link to our State and National campaign to your Legislators. Please use it
now and let us all move forward to securing medical freedom.
https://thenhf.com/pass-the-medical-freedom-amendment.

-Michael LeVesque-
Picture
Picture
0 Comments

Medical Freedom Amendment Power Point Presentation

6/13/2024

0 Comments

 
Picture

Updated Wording and Power Point Presentation

The Medical Freedom Amendment is presented as a PowerPoint presentation from June 8th, 2024 with a focus on historical observations, destruction of medical alternatives, monopoly of medicine, decline of health, and government coercion and abuse. (Special thanks to Charles Frohman and Jim Grapek at Freedom Hub and Health Biz and Politics https://rumble.com/c/c-281431).

It is within this context the necessity of medical freedom gets expressed. Medical Freedom is the individual's absolute and inalienable right to autonomy over one's body regarding all medical treatment. The amendment presents a wall of opposition against abusive laws, rules, regulations, countermeasures, executive and emergency orders, international treaties and Agreements that deny freedom of choice, informed consent, medical privacy and medical freedom for our most intimate decisions.  

The Medical Freedom Amendment secures our inalienable rights and body autonomy. It is far reaching and must be added to the United States Constitution as the 28th Amendment to protect us and future generations. It is in that sense of our Founding Fathers the 11th Amendment to the  Bill of Rights of the US Constitution.

 "Countermeasure", through trickery of terminology (bait and switch), allowed medical experimentation fast tracked as a military bio weapon against the illusive terrorist virus that utilized a limited medical arsenal of the Pharmaceutical International Corporations under the 1910 Flexner Report influence that ensures allopathic monopoly and forbade any other more effective therapeutic solutions for a questionable epidemic. This has proven to be a horrible failure creating harm and death beyond our imaginations.

The use of propaganda, monetary bonus funding, censorship and punishment to any critics. only now is unraveling. This Government produced and advocated false narratives  as we now witness the revealing of the truth and facts. For example Italy recently reviewed their numbers and reduced the deaths due to COVID-19 by over 90%. When will we in the United States review our stats? When will the public be fully informed of the tragedy that government knowingly committed or blindly followed?
 
The government endorsed this activity and laid its groundwork. It then incentivized hospitals and doctors to endorse its actions. It destroyed small businesses that act independently, while allowing corporations to maintain business since they easily institute behavior. This was a government coup against the people in the name of salvation. Neither the problem nor the solution were correct. We must maintain freedom of choice and protection of our rights knowing only we know what's right for our bodies.
 
Can we trust our government to uphold our medical freedom without enacting the Medical Freedom Amendment? The answer is simple – NO. The risk is too great, and experience requires enactment.

We, the People, must have protection of medical freedom, that our choices remain enforceable under the law and free from any and all abuse.  This Amendment is for the Individual. It is not for the government, corporations, associations, unions or any other groups. It is for each person's individual protection of their medical freedom, body autonomy, informed consent, and medical choice.

We face impending danger from the World Health Organization in the form of international treaties and agreements. Scott Tips, President of the National Health Federation, made this point to me recently as expressed in Article VI of the United States Constitution. These terms and wording of Scott are added to fully protect our inalienable rights from tyranny, despotism and dictatorship under all circumstances, including international.

The Medical Freedom Amendment is a national call for public participation to build a wall of defense for our most human and intimate freedom. We are in a state of crisis approaching a perfect storm that will produce apocalyptic results an we require protection of our inalienable rights. We require leadership that will endorse the amendment in its full stature and renew the commitment to medical freedom and body autonomy.

Here is the recently amended Medical Freedom Amendment:

"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.

Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."

The Medical Freedom Amendment videos are on YouTube and the MFA blog March 2024 at MedicalFreedomAmendment.org in several languages – Spanish, French, German, Portuguese, and Italian.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-h2K-8HUvU
 
Join the National Health Federation and take part in supporting the Medical Freedom Amendment. Go to Campaigns at https://thenhf.com/pass-the-medical-freedom-amendment/
-Michael LeVesque-
0 Comments

The Destruction of Medical Freedom and Medical Competition

5/6/2024

0 Comments

 
Picture

The Destruction of Medical Freedom

By the early 1900’s medical care was highly competitive with many different approaches focusing on the Individual’s well-being and health. The United States was becoming the healthiest Nation in the world with the greatest medical freedom.
    
In 1910 the first major assault on medical freedom occurred with the Flexner Report, financed by the two richest men in America – John D. Rockefeller and Dale Carnegie, published by the Carnegie Institute. The report focused on the German school of medicine which placed research as the major focus and pharmacology as the only solution against diseases. No medical school could be created without the permission of the government. Within 10 years the number of medical schools dropped from 650 to 50, the number of medical students decreased from 7500 to 2500.
    
All medical research was required to fully adhere to the protocols of scientific materialism, medication, and vaccination. The focus changed from the well-being of the patient to medical experimentation.  This became the standard for all American Medical Association (AMA) endorsed medical schools. All other approaches to health and medicine- which included Homeopathy, Chiropractic, Eclectic School of Medicine, Osteopathy, Electrical Medicine, and Massage were demoted as quackery.

With advances in biochemistry and biophysics allopathic medicine is outdated yet maintains its monopoly. The United States undoubtedly would be the healthiest nation with the lowest health care costs in the world if holistic traditional medicine had freedom to flourish. Holistic medicine schools look at the whole body and the environment in which it resides. We would not have the pharma/chemical international corporations poisoning our bodies, skies, air, soil, and ocean controlling health and our government.
    
Pharmaceutical medicines proved to have bad effects redefined as “side effects” and the fourth major cause of death in the United States. The health care system is held captive, and pharma advertising money controls the media, news, and editorial content. Sadly, two extremely wealthy men practicing their own form of pseudoscience thought that they knew what was best for our health.  Sound familiar? 
 
The major coup of medical freedom took place through our government’s participation, leadership, and subjugation. In 1997 the World Health Organization of the United Nations obtained full control over medicine for all the Nation members. The power of the Flexner Report is worldwide and allopathic medical care the world standard. It is enforced by our government.
    
A year earlier, a major coup was attained through the Telecommunications Act of 1996 that placed medical health outside the powers of medical science into the hands of engineers of the wireless industry. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had already determined the dangers of EMR pollution. This enables the industry unlimited expansion of wireless while exposing the entire population to electromagnetic radiation interictal spike pulsations so highly multiplied and strong they produce every conceivable illness, cancer, and the debilitation and destruction of nature.

The Big Coup is our Age of Pandemics. This is the coordinated efforts of government, military, medicine, and leadership. This is the big event where the public is blindsided, hoodwinked, gaslighted, deceived, defrauded, and victimized. We know its effects and fear more to come possibly dressed in new clothing.

The recent pandemic had the government produce a major news and social psychological propaganda campaign. Scott Tips, President of the National Health Federation, in the earliest days authored an article published in Health Freedom News that exposed the truth. - Spring 2020, Vol 38, No. 1- stating in essence that “the latest Coronavirus attack is a cover for restricting our health freedoms.” - Never Has So Little Done So Much Harm To So Many. https://thenhf.com/never-has-so-little-done-so-much-harm-to-so-many/

We now know the COVID shots were not vaccinations. The government approved the injections as anti-terrorists’ “countermeasures” in the form of technological computerized formulas in a sea of chemicals foreign to our bodies under authority of the Patriot Act of 2001, and the PREP Act of 2005 to function as a military response with immunity of liability. Technically, “the shots” are “countermeasures”, that is one word. In this case the "countermeasure" is a GMO injection. The results have been devastating as direct evidence from VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) government reporting system demonstrates.

The Medical Freedom Amendment is a national call for public participation to build a wall of defense for our most intimate freedom. We are in a state of crisis approaching a perfect storm that will produce apocalyptic results. We require leadership that will endorse the amendment in its full stature. Here is the Medical Freedom Amendment…

"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.

Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."

The Medical Freedom Amendment videos are on YouTube and the MFA blog March 2024 at MedicalFreedomAmendment.org in several languages. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-h2K-8HUvU

Support the National Health Federation (NHF). It is the first organization to endorse and support the Medical Freedom Amendment. Hopefully, other organizations will soon follow in NHF's footsteps. This comports with NHF's nearly seven-decades-long tradition of promoting and defending health freedom as well as its long history of consumer and individual health protection on local and global levels, including its unique position of participation in the Codex Alimentarius process.
The NHF Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign
 -Michael LeVesque-

0 Comments

"Egregious" Court Ruling Enforced

4/13/2024

0 Comments

 


Medical Freedom Attacked by the Court System
"Bait and Switch"
Medical Freedom is the most important issue of this election period.
Who will defend it, who will deny it, who doesn't care. Better find out, your health depends on it.

Picture

The Headline:
“NC Court Rules Federal PREP Act Protects
Forced Vaccination Without Parental Approval"

The North Carolina Court of Appeals has ruled against a mother and son who sued the Guilford County school board and the Old North State Medical Society over a 14-year-old boy's forced COVID-19 vaccination. This ruling was March 5th, 2024.

The vaccination occurred without parental consent and against the boy’s consent and wishes. The Old North State Medical Society forced the son to receive the Pfizer/BioNTech Comirnaty COVID shot. He had come only to be tested for COVID. The court acknowledged that the intent of the state law is to protect bodily autonomy and parental rights, and that the violation suffered by the plaintiffs by being forced to take the shot against his wishes was outrageous and "egregious".

North Carolina state law provides that “a health care provider shall obtain written consent from a parent or legal guardian prior to administering any vaccine that has been granted emergency use authorization and is not yet fully approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to an individual under 18 years of age,”

Nevertheless, the Appeals Court reached a unanimous “egregious” decision against the mother and son taking away the boy’s personal inalienable medical freedom, requirement of parental consent, and body autonomy. What was the Court of Appeals mentality to defile justice?

The state statute, according to the Court, was preempted by the federal act of Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act of 1905 (PREP Act). The court concluded that the Guilford Board of Education, which hosted the clinic, was not at fault. They based this on three others out of state cases. We witness the growth of case precedents to remove State’s authority over medicine as provided by the 10th amendment to the United States Constitution.

The boy had attended a free testing center for COVID since he had been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 virus and needed clearance to attend football practice. The letter informing him of the clinic stated, “consent for testing is required.”

However, testing and vaccination are two different things. (another Bait and Switch)

There was no body autonomy, no parental consent, no personal consent, no protection by state law, no informed consent, a misleading statement of consent and force used to give the "vaccination". This is wrong.
 
Informed Consent is a Rule of Law which means that it cannot be pre-empted nor is it conditional by the passage of any law denying it. Therefore, there are no conditions restraining its actions. Informed consent goes hand in hand with medical choice. One cannot make a medical choice without informed consent.

The court case also includes battery charges. This determination means that the PREP Act can include a physically forced “countermeasure” (switch), called a “vaccination" (bait). What were our legislators thinking when they passed this affront and denial of freedom? Are we seeing our legislators’ naked
behavior of insouciance? What other things could a “countermeasure“ include in the future? It could mean whatever the government proclaims. Government cannot be trusted and its purpose is to protect our freedom.

The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) states explicitly that any other law to the contrary is subject to the PREP Act as stated:

Subject to the other provisions of this section, a covered person shall be immune from suit and liability under Federal and State law with respect to all claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a covered countermeasure if a declaration under subsection (b) has been issued with respect to such countermeasure.


The PREP Act provides tyranny, despotism and medical enslavement. The PREP act goes even further by giving immunity to any “covered person” and who may that be in the future? Who can do what to whom? What other rights we hold dear are in danger and easily ignored and by whom without recourse?
Where did this term "countermeasure" originate? It is under the USA Patriot Act of 2001 which was over 500+ pages long and introduced the very next day after the 9/11 Twin Towers terrorist act. This is why the Medical Freedom Amendment includes the term “countermeasure”. We now know the COVID-19 shots were not “vaccinations”, they were "countermeasures".  
 
The USA government approved the multitude of experimental injections as military anti-terrorist “countermeasures” in the form of technological computerized formulas of a modified RNA spike in a sea of chemicals foreign to our bodies, actually a genetically modified organism (GMO), under authority of the USA Patriot Act of 2001, and the PREP Act of 2005 to function as a military response with immunity from liability.
 
Did you know that the Pfizer shots listed hundreds of side-effects (bad-effects) prior to approval? Were you ever told that? Of course you weren’t, and that means you were denied Informed Consent.

The USA Patriot Act of 2001 was not conceived, hopefully, to expose the entire population to the tyranny of government over our medical freedom to allow an international corporate pharmaceutical monopoly give siege on the treasury of the United States and an attack by experimentation upon United States citizens. If this act is conceived as a weapon against us, we the citizens, then it is a criminal act. It now appears to be that.
 
The results have been devastating as direct evidence from the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) government reporting system demonstrates at the Government’s website and the graph at the end of this Blog.. The pandemic was a dark moment of deception in numerous ways.
 
And yes, the "countermeasure" is an "emergency use authorization”. The State has every right to negate the Federal law by Constitutional authority. The court ruled wrong. No "egregious" act should be enforced by any court anywhere.
 
The court by its ruling has unanimously enforced dictatorship and destroyed medical freedom for this young person, and in so doing, dissolved state's rights over medical freedom.

Will this case be appealed? What would the United States Supreme Court rule? Will the court look at our inalienable rights under the Constitution as it is intended? Will it give the Government absolute rule over our medical freedom because of potential future perceived health problem narratives? Will reason and justice rule?
 
 "Countermeasure", through trickery of terminology (bait and switch) as a "vaccination", allowed medical experimentation fast tracked as a military weapon against the illusive terrorist virus that utilized a limited medical arsenal of the Pharmaceutical International Corporations under the 1910 Flexner Report influence that ensures allopathic monopoly and forbade any other more effective therapeutic solutions for a questionable epidemic. For example, Italy recently reviewed their numbers and reduced the deaths due to COVID-19 by over 90%. When will we review the lies?
 
The government endorsed this activity and laid its groundwork. It then incentivized hospitals and doctors to endorse its actions. It destroyed small businesses that act independently, while allowing corporations to maintain business since they easily institute behavior. This was a government coup against the people in the name of salvation.
 
Can we trust our government to uphold our medical freedom without enacting the Medical Freedom Amendment? The answer is simple – NO. The risk is too great, and experience requires enactment.

Now we face impending danger from the World Health Organization in the form of international treaties and agreements. Scott Tips, President of the National Health Federation, made this point to me recently as expressed in Article VI of the United States Constitution. These terms and wording of Scott are added to fully protect our inalienable rights from tyranny, despotism and dictatorship under all circumstances.

The Medical Freedom Amendment is a national call for public participation to build a wall of defense for our most human and intimate freedom. We are in a state of crisis approaching a perfect storm that will produce apocalyptic results. We require leadership that will endorse the amendment in its full stature and renew the commitment to medical freedom and body autonomy.

Here is the recently amended Medical Freedom Amendment:

"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.

Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."

The Medical Freedom Amendment videos are on YouTube and the MFA blog March 2024 at MedicalFreedomAmendment.org in several languages – Spanish, French, German, Portuguese, and Italian.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-h2K-8HUvU
 
Join the National Health Federation. Take part in supporting the Medical Freedom Amendment. Go to Campaigns at https://thenhf.com/pass-the-medical-freedom-amendment/
 
The NHF Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign
-Michael LeVesque-
Picture
0 Comments

Medical Freedom Amendment Illuminated

3/3/2024

0 Comments

 

Why, How, What Does It All Mean?
Medical Freedom Amendment

Picture
Here is a new ten minute video that goes into the deep meaning and impact of the Medical Freedom Amendment and why it is so necessary. Included is the text for the video. The video is also translated into several languages and available at the end of this article, presently in French, German, Spanish, Italian, and Portuguese.

Medical freedom is the individual's absolute and inalienable right to autonomy over one's body regarding all medical treatment. This video gives an in depth account of Informed Consent and how it applies to medical treatment and Medical Privacy. This helps unravel the complexity and necessity of Medical Freedom.

It takes a close look at what laws and logic have been ignored and trampled upon and states the right direction for the future. There is also disclosure that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have ruled to allow the denial of Informed Consent and have adopted "Future Framework" that no longer requires clinical studies for reformulated shots.

The Medical Freedom Amendment is far reaching and must be added to the United States Constitution as the 28th Amendment to protect our health, our relationship with our personal health care provider and autonomy. The amendment provides a wall of opposition against abusive laws, rules, regulations, executive and emergency orders and countermeasures that deny freedom of choice for our most intimate decisions. Current events have stifled scientific debate and open discussion for solutions that could save a multitude of lives and affect our health and longevity.

The Medical Freedom Amendment 28 is supported by those who revere truth and critical scientific study, and oppose scientific censorship and government propaganda.

English   French, German at the end of this article.

 Medical Freedom Amendment

Medical Freedom Amendment 28 Proposed to the United States Constitution as the 28th Amendment. A crash course and the necessity of -  NOW is the time!
2
00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:43,000
We are experiencing medical oppression, medical censorship, medical discrimination, and medical abuse of unprecedented scope, with no accountability or responsibility on the part of the oppressors, censors, and abusers- this state of affairs has continued for too long, has become intolerable, and must end now.
3
00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:57,470
The Medical Freedom Amendment secures our inalienable rights and body autonomy. It is  far reaching  and must be added to the United States Constitution to protect us and  future generations. It reads as follows...
4
00:00:57,470 --> 00:01:23,200
"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, or emergency order that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice."
5
00:01:23,200 --> 00:01:52,900
"Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, or emergency order that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents.
6
00:01:52,900 --> 00:02:03,400
 Medical Freedom is the Individual’s absolute and inalienable right to autonomy over one’s body regarding all medical treatment.
7
00:02:03,400 --> 00:02:19,000
Medical freedom requires enforcement in all medical practice, from health care providers, physicians, public health officials, researchers, governmental bodies, manufacturers, and all others involved or have an impact on an Individual’s health care.
8
00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:27,960
Informed Consent is the most important issue of the 21st century. It is the cornerstone of medical freedom and  Individual health
9
00:02:27,960 --> 00:02:42,590
Informed Consent is a legal and ethical concept that ensures the Individual has the right to be fully informed about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a medical intervention before making a decision.
10
00:02:42,590 --> 00:02:52,460
There is an overlap between medical choice and informed consent, emphasizing that informed decision-making is a key aspect of exercising medical choice.
11
00:02:52,460 --> 00:03:00,640
The most important aspect of the Medical Freedom Amendment is- “All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose.”
12
00:03:00,640 --> 00:03:07,590
Medical privacy involves safeguarding an individual's personal health information from unauthorized disclosure.
13
00:03:07,590 --> 00:03:17,520
It is crucial for maintaining trust in the healthcare system and ensuring individuals can seek medical care without fear of unwarranted intrusion.
14
00:03:17,520 --> 00:03:41,020
Clayton J. Baker, M.D., presented a definition of Medical Freedom on the Brownstone Institute website, and a list of innumerable abuses to civil rights inflicted by the health establishment and physicians upon the Individual.https://brownstone.org/articles/what-is-medical-freedom-exactly/
15
00:03:41,020 --> 00:03:57,350
He writes, "In the wake of the Covid-19 catastrophe, and in light of the innumerable abuses and affronts to basic civil rights that the public health establishment and the physicians under them inflicted upon citizens, several derivative statements follow."
16
00:03:57,350 --> 00:04:08,220
"Confidentiality is central to patient autonomy. Specifically, any “health passport” type of public health approach violates patient autonomy and must be forbidden."
17
00:04:08,220 --> 00:04:32,460
"The patient-physician partnership. The patient, working one-on-one with their physician, must make clinical care decisions, with the patient reserving ultimate authority to decide. Clinical care decisions must not be predetermined by government bureaucrats, statistical analyses, industry influence, insurance carriers, or other outside influences."
18
00:04:32,460 --> 00:04:47,270
"Non-maleficence refers to the "First, do no harm" precept of medical practice. No medical treatment should be imposed on any patient that is likely to harm the patient, or where the risk/benefit ratio is negative for that patient."
19
00:04:47,270 --> 00:05:08,400
"Coercion of any kind, applied to patients or health care providers, violates patient autonomy. This includes bribery, incentivization, threats, blackmail, public shaming, scapegoating, exclusion or ostracization from society, deceptive advertising, and all other forms of coercion."
20
00:05:08,400 --> 00:05:32,170
"Patient redress. Patients must have the right to seek real and meaningful redress for any kind of negligent or malicious harm done to them by any physicians, health care systems, public health officials, or producers of drugs or other health care products. No one involved in the healthcare enterprise may be immune, and laws providing such immunity must be removed."
21
00:05:32,170 --> 00:05:42,510
Actions and  events are destroying medical freedom. One is the recent FDA Rule denying informed consent,another is the FDA's "Future Framework".
22
00:05:42,510 --> 00:05:56,540
Informed consent requires the disclosure of all relevant information, ensuring understanding, capacity to comprehend, and alternatives that leads ultimately to the Individual patient's agreement or refusal.
23
00:05:56,540 --> 00:06:10,990
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) placed a rule in its administration effective January 23rd, 2024 that it will not follow Informed Consent.  Certified Government Publishing Office 88228:
24
00:06:10,990 --> 00:06:22,720
The final rule permits an institutional review board (IRB) to waive or alter certain informed consent elements or to waive the requirement to obtain informed consent,
25
00:06:22,720 --> 00:06:41,140
On April 6, 2022, the members of the FDA expert advisory committee on vaccine safety (VRBPAC) unanimously agreed that the COVID-19 shots weren’t working, needed reformulation, boosting was not the answer, and that there was no protective benefit.
26
00:06:41,140 --> 00:06:55,120
Back in springtime 2022 the FDA began removing some of the VAERS reports. Also, the government allowed the FDA to adopt "Future Framework" allowing reformulations of shots without clinical trials!
27
00:07:18,290 --> 00:07:29,520
No informed consent , no clinical trials! What has happened to the practice of medicine and logic?  We are faced with dangerous, apathetic, and destructive public policies.
28
00:07:29,520 --> 00:07:54,680
Public health is extremely important. The Medical Freedom Amendment recognizes this importance and sees the urgency for Public Health to do its proper job. The number one most significant threat to public health is now wireless electromagnetic radiation pollution followed closely by air pollution (including geoengineering), water pollution, and soil pollution.
29
00:07:54,680 --> 00:08:10,330
Public Health’s role is to identify the pollution, reduce and eliminate it. By protecting our environment, we can eliminate the causes of our chronic diseases. We do not need a war on cancer. We need  a war on the causes of cancer!
30
00:08:10,330 --> 00:08:21,140
 Government mandates replace sovereign rights with “Public Health” casting a net of enslavement forcing wrong medical action even against our personal health care provider's advice.
31
00:08:21,140 --> 00:08:31,430
Medical Freedom Amendment (MFA) is supported by those who revere  truth,  critical scientific study, and oppose scientific censorship, and government propaganda.
32
00:08:31,430 --> 00:08:54,860
Here is the problem:  We are speeding towards the elimination of Medical Freedom by the World Health Organization, Governmental Agencies and a Congress tied to corporate money for re-election. We must unite and act NOW to protect our health and sovereignty. The Medical Freedom Amendment provides that unity and strength.
33
00:08:54,860 --> 00:09:20,360
Join the National Health Federation (NHF) which endorses and supports the Medical Freedom Amendment. The NHF has a long tradition of promoting and defending health freedom, consumer and individual health protection and its unique position of participation in the Codex Alimentarius process. The NHF Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign - the nhf.com
34
00:09:20,360 --> 00:09:39,010
The Medical Freedom Amendment has grown into a true demarcation between the government's right to prescribe and demand medical treatment and our Individual inalienable right to control our medical and health decisions. This Individual Right is inalienable and absolute.
35
00:09:39,010 --> 00:09:44,340
The time is NOW! Participate in the Medical Freedom Amendment 28.
36
00:09:44,340 --> 00:09:56,340
 Michael LeVesque
Board of Governors The National Health Federation
MedicalFreedomAmendment.org
© 2024 All Rights Reserved
Great Highway Productions

Medical Freedom Amendment Video Translations

German (Deutsch)
French (Français)

Spanish (Español)

Italian (Italiano)

Portuguese (Português)

0 Comments
<<Previous

    Archives

    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022

    Michael LeVesque

    Webmaster and Gatekeeper,
    Board Member of the National Health Federation

    RSS Feed

    Picture

      Signup for the Medical Freedom Amendment Broadcast

    Subscribe
    We have no marketing or promotional materials - only the Broadcast.