28th Medical Freedom Amendment
POST IN
  • Home
  • Call to Action
  • Blog
  • Q&A
  • Petition
  • Questionnaire
  • Representative Letter

What Must Happen Now!

10/13/2025

0 Comments

 

70th Anniversary Celebration of
the National Health Federation
in Dallas, Texas, March 2025

     This video is created from the presentation of Michael LeVesque at the Anniversary event of the National Health Federation. It was preceded with this music video. All together it was a ten minute presentation. Medical Freedom Amendment has many ramifications. There will be a book released by the end of the year in full detail.

      "For most of our lives we accepted, almost without thought, that government experts, pharmaceutical corporations, and international agencies could decide what entered our bodies, what treatments we must accept, and which questions could not be asked. We were told this was science, but it was in truth bureaucracy wearing the mask of science. Yet a human being is not the property of a program. The flesh that breathes, feels, and thinks belongs first and last to the individual soul that inhabits it. Whenever that simple truth is forgotten, civilization’s moral compass spins into confusion and fear.
     The Medical Freedom Amendment restores balance. It declares that the liberty proclaimed in 1776 and the rights enshrined in 1791 extend all the way to the skin, the cell, and the conscience. It forbids coercion in medicine because coercion breeds error, and it protects informed consent because truth cannot flourish where speech is stifled. To secure one’s own health in the manner one chooses is not a privilege but the cornerstone of self‑government itself. When citizens regain sovereignty over their bodies, they regain the capacity for genuine trust, voluntary cooperation, and the renewal of public virtue. That is the purpose—and the promise—of medical freedom."

     The Medical Freedom Amendment is the proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution. Time is proving its urgency as AI takes over many facets of medicine and the government continues on its road of personal surveillance, digital ID's, and monetary policy of CBDC’s (Central Bank Digital Currencies). 
     These are treacherous times and in need of emergency action to protect personal freedom and rights, body autonomy, medical privacy, medical choice, and Informed Consent - a Rule of Law which is legally beyond those denied by government actions and government mandated medical interventions once placed within the United States Constitution.
     This is a battle between 1910 materialism, that advocated pharmacology and vaccination as the only solutions to what ails people and often wrong. Wealth pushed it forward for obvious reasons of gaining more wealth and with that wealth used it to lobby and pass legislation that protected pharmaceutical industry from us when harm occurred. 
      The second part of the Amendment is the explicit
reversal of the Supreme Court’s 1905 decision, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, which upheld compulsory smallpox vaccination on the premise that individual liberty could yield to “public safety.” That 1905 decision has been the legal keystone supporting every mandate, quarantine, and emergency order since.
     The Medical Freedom Amendment’s warrant clause conceptually overturns Jacobson — it replaces collectivist utilitarianism with personal sovereignty + due process.
     Where Jacobson said, “the community has the right to protect itself,” this Amendment says, “the individual is the community — and must first be proven a demonstrable danger before any intrusion.”
       The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.” is not a throwaway line in the Medical Freedom Amendment. It is constitutional dynamite. To appreciate just how powerful it is, you need to understand what Article VI actually does, and how global institutions have been using it.
      Once the U.S. Senate ratifies a treaty, its provisions are binding on every state and citizen — even overriding state laws, and in practice, sometimes being treated as having quasi constitutional weight. For decades, global bureaucracies have exploited this mechanism to bypass Congress and the public under the label of “international cooperation.”
     This Amendment severs the chain of command between international treaties and individual rights. By saying Article VI does not apply, it removes medical autonomy from the scope of any treaty or global regulation. It prevents the federal government from using treaty obligations as justification for restricting domestic freedoms. It creates a new constitutional hierarchy. It forces judicial warrant standards for any intrusion, which means even if WHO policies claim an emergency, implementation inside the U.S. would require a case-by-case probable cause warrant. 

     The government can suggest personal health aids but should never supersede the person or the relationship with the health care provider. Always, the Individual has the final say. We must choose action if there is to be change.
Support 
the Medical Freedom Amendment as follows:

     “All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive order, emergency declaration, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual’s rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment."
     Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive order, emergency declaration, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual’s right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual’s condition and danger it presents.”


     The National Health Federation has a link on their website to actively take part at thenhf.com/campaigns
     Also, updates at TheMedicalFreedomAmendment.org website
-Michael LeVesque-

0 Comments

Freedom of Medicine

9/26/2025

0 Comments

 

Freedom of Medical Choice
MUST
Include Freedom of Medicine

Picture
     Is there an alternative, a solution, and a salvation for medical care in this country?
     Yes, most definitely! It is freedom of medicine which is necessary to have freedom of medical choice as stipulated in the proposed Medical Freedom Amendment.
     What is freedom of medicine? Freedom of medicine is a free exchange with differences co-existing in an open exchange that belong to the whole field of medicine creating health of the Individual. This inclusion of all fields of medicine and health care reduces control, domination, and isolation by any single field.
     Conflicts will arise since that is a necessary part of medical freedom. Such conflicts require medical disclosure and integrity of those presenting. Conflict is a necessary condition where resolution of conflicts find resolution without destroying the rules of exchange. It enhances medical and health knowledge. It is another aspect of the free marketplace.
     Without freedom of medicine medical choice remains as a chattel and bound by an outdated medical system that was ensconced and maintained by the Flexner Report of 1910 John D Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie financed the Flexner Report. Their extreme wealth and hubris wanted to control illness and saw the strength of a German medical orthodoxy system as the only solution.
     With their wealth and dominance, they effectively secured the government’s endorsement of the goals of the Flexner Report. The Report gave detailed regulations of education and pharmacology as the only solution against diseases. Period!
     This followed the theory of materialism and that all phenomena including human consciousness was considered medical interactions. That medicine should focus on experimentation as the most important function of education to promote learning rather than the patient. Therefore, all medical research must adhere fully to the protocols of scientific research of the 1910 materialism, medication, and vaccination.
     This elimination of freedom of medicine produced the dire conditions of today. Advances in biochemistry, bionutrition, and biophysics makes this view of the world outdated. Nevertheless, allopathic drug medical practice maintains this monopoly. It has lied, cheated, propagandized, and bought governmental control through lobbying and re-election donations. It has isolated itself, dominated medical treatment while controlling the marketplace, government, and the media.
     Allopathic medicine maintains control through hospitals, educational institutions, Medical State Boards, independent medical journals, advertising, propaganda and tightly regulated membership of the American Medical Association, a trade organization and a multitude of other medical trade associations. It uses rules and regulations called Standard of Care through state medical boards and medical tests that project conditions often inaccurately placing people on medications.
     Medical freedom and freedom of medicine go hand in hand. Medical informed choice requires freedom of medicine. What does this mean? It means the FDA controls freedom of medicine to our determine. It should not be allowed to do so. The government must be lobbied and pressured to create a new and independent Department of Medical Modalities and Bio-nutrition.
      Science requires pharmaceuticals to be highly regulated because of the possible injury and death from its products. At the same time, the FDA has as its pronounced goal the protection and advancement of the pharmaceutical industry against all other competition. It is completely counterproductive for American society to have such a monopoly of medical and health care regulating all other competitors.
     A new Department of Medical Modalities and Bio-nutrition would bring competition back into a competitive marketplace and help create new orientations of learning in our educational institutions with knowledge of advancement available long overdue. Freedom of medicine enhances informed consent and medical choice. It would remove unnecessary governmental control over personal health and personal medicine. It would free up current areas of concern from public health while enhancing public health’s focus on securing a healthier environment from pollutants advocated by corporate wealth such electromagnetic radiation pollution (EMRP).
     Many institutions in the early 1900’s were shuttered because of the Flexner Report of 1910. Homeopathy, herbal eclectic, chiropractic, osteopathy, electromedicine, and massage were all denigrated as quackery.  This stopped the advancement of medicine and produced the morphed, often dangerous and ineffective pharmaceutical industry’s dominance. Homeopathic remedies have long been more protective and cost effective than allopathic pharmaceuticals and vaccination. It was grandfathered in under the FDA and treated as competition to allopathic medicine.
     For example homeopathy has a distinguished record of safety, effectiveness, and gentleness for endless countless diseases, infections and illnesses. With the advent of It was one of the major schools of medicine before the Flexner Report. It remains today the most used system of healing throughout the world but hidden in the United States. The FDA recently created new rules to successfully eliminate homeopathic eye drops from the marketplace. Smilisan eye drops were a number one seller for eye relief. Without one complaint it was forced to leave the marketplace by the FDA creating new rules for homeopathic eye drops that mirror those for allopathic drugs.
     Abraham Lincoln was a big advocate of homeopathy because of its unparalleled success in treating cholera, yellow fever, diphtheria and influenza compared to conventional medicine. During that post Flexner Report period, one saw the shuttering of schools of chiropractic, osteopathy, massage, elector-therapeutics and herbalist, specifically the Eclectics.
     The Eclectic’s herbal encyclopedia, King’s American Dispensatory was updated in 1898 by Harvey Felter MD and John Lloyd MD. It is an extensive compiling of herbal and chemical knowledge in two volumes, over 2,000 pages of in-depth information – preparation, action, botanical source, history, description, chemical composition, medicinal usage, dosage, cautions, specific indication, other uses, related species. A significant percentage of drugs are derived from knowledge of the eclectics and modified or synthesized and patented for sale.
     After 1910 we were faced with an orthodoxy of medicine that reviled all other modalities and restricted any other effective therapeutics. It all started because the two wealthiest men in the world at the time, John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie, thought they knew what was best for America and of course with oil (coal tar) a basis for organic chemistry and patenting it assured added wealth.
     At present the dangers for medical freedom are at a  new level, and our health is at greater risk than ever before. As great as the hope of MAHA (Make America Healthy Again) to move forward and make the necessary changes, the overriding landscape portends a life struggle that must meet the over-riding power of the pharmaceutical industry and its institutions, media, and trade associations that seek retention of their wealth and seek the removal of Robert F. Kennedy from his leadership at the Department of Health and Human Services.
     One must Include the government’s denial and negligence regarding the dangers of electromagnetic radiation pollution (EMRP), and the ubiquitous development of censors for surveillance brought forth by the wireless industry. EMRP also affects the Schumann resonance of this planet, the polluting of the skies from space junk wireless transmitters, and the ionization of the lower atmosphere through geoengineering further polluting our air. The neglect to properly protect the public is a public health issue that will only worsen as more EMRP wavelengths come into use and create such cellular damage to DNA and RNA being expressed through the mitochondria, and the other organelles of the cell.
     This expression within the cell is in the form of metabolic dysfunction, oxidative stress, and chronic inflammation creating disease in all forms. These are not the result of a pathogen, rather the results of the ubiquitous presence of the high levels of interictal spikes of micro and radio frequency pollution. To continual unabated and without proper regulation is to court the eventual destruction of Nature and humanity.
     When including 5G in the surveillance and control of organ function and hormone regulation, through the internet of body (IoB) and the control of energy exchange within the body by the internet of quantum (IoQ) through alliteration of 5G into 6G, 7G, and 8G one can see once again an informed orthodoxy that is pulling a curtain of ignorance and hubris over truth, eliminating controversy, and placing all its energy into creating wealth and power for an insane limited perception of reality while denying existence.
     Much of the advancement in health has been through public health- clean water, clean air, and clean food aligned with dietary knowledge and especially in this country nutritional supplementation. There is much more to be gained. We are living in an era of synthetic intelligence that if properly given facts can speed up some analysis and offer some creative solutions.
     At the same time, it is a dangerous tradeoff with our ignorance and hubris leading us down a primrose path. Medical and environmental science has moved far ahead in protecting health and eliminating disease. Allowed freedom and implementation based on true facts there would be an end to the overwhelming debt of medical care. Once again we would experience vibrant health for ourselves and our children through time.
      These advancements however need medical freedom not to be controlled, manipulated, and isolated by those seeking to retain their wealth at the expense of effectiveness. This will be controlled by securing freedom of medicine, medical freedom, and opening the communication of the health sciences to each other.
     To keep a new Department of Medical Modalities and Bionutrition as a fact based and independent agency and not captured by powerful corporate wealth require a unique agency. There is a model from the past that appeared to work well. It was the Office of Technology Assessment which was designed in a way to offset many of the problems of Congressional advisory systems. Its main objective was governmental and public access to relevant information.
     This abundance of accurate information available to the public, media, and government representatives enhances competition unlike the present structure and rules of the Food and Drug Administration. Most importantly, it would enhance informed consent while reducing the profit motive within its body. For example, bionutrition must compete in the marketplace because there is no patenting of a nutrient with a high safety profile. There will be competition and patents on processes of delivery and manufacturing. However, many nutrients by companies are sourced equally and it is  beneficial competition amongst companies benefiting the public marketplace. 
   
 Freedom of medicine enables health advancements and provides a landscape that encourages health care providers focus on the emotional state and sensitivities as well as physical of the person.
     One book I recently read provided an excellent and thorough view of the many modalities available. It is by Ana Maria Mihalcea, M.D., Ph. D. in her book Light Medicine, A New Paradigm – The Science of Light, Spirit, and Longevity. There are many great books providing insights to good health. One published by a Board Member of the National Health Federation deals with pregnancy filled with information and recently reviewed in Health Freedom Magazine called Expecting Fitness and Nutrition - Quantum Pregnancy is by Birgitta Lauren.
-Michael LeVesque-

Picture
Picture
0 Comments

A Podcast Conversation -  Medical Freedom Amendment

8/29/2025

0 Comments

 

An Overview of Medical Freedom and Its Future

     This conversational interview regards the proposed Medial Freedom Amendment as the 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution.
    Afterwards it was requested that I share a copy of the cover letter written to Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. read in the podcast.
     Here it is:

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Secretary
United States Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201

Dear Secretary Robert Kennedy, Jr.,
     As Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) your leadership directs our government’s role to improve our health and at the same time protect our individual uniqueness and protection from unnecessary and coercive medical interventions. However, there is more than ever a great danger of harm as wealth girds its limbs for battle to maintain its role of authority and protection of wealth.
     This has become a plague upon us that needs righting and justice. Our relationship with our health care provider is a special and unique one that should take priority over any governmental medical intervention. History has proven damage and suffering when one medical choice is enforced upon us all. It has also proven beyond any doubt the necessity for true facts as absolutely necessary for informed consent. Government should never create or endorse medical tyranny and lying. Government’s role is to protect us from despotism and not to abuse and betray us with injustices, propaganda, and dispossessions.
     It is with this heavy heart that cries out for all those who have suffered that we must take up the most difficult of labors. Wealth is a dangerous state of being. The mind creates corporations for protection and laws which seek protection against legal retribution with retention of its wealth no matter the consequences. The results as you have well pointed out are catastrophic, painfully so. If we are not to have freedom, protection, and choice then we are to enter into our own government’s created holocaust.
     Please read over the attached writing for the addition to the US Constitution of the Medical Freedom Amendment and further the possible creation of a governmental department to enhance and protect the Freedom of Medicine. Faith and trust abide with you and if I can in any way assist this process, I am at your service.

Most sincerely,
Raymond Michael LeVesque
0 Comments

Courts Sanction Authoritarianism

8/9/2025

0 Comments

 

The Ninth Circuit Rules against the Rule of Law

Picture
This is a guest Blog presentation by The Health Freedom Defense Fund with a vision near and dear to my heart written by Leslie Manookian whose broad background lends to the depth and meaning of her writing. 

The Ninth Circuit Rules – Court Sanctioned Authoritarianism?

By Leslie Manookian August 4, 2025

     On July 31, 2025, the Ninth Circuit issued its ruling in Health Freedom Defense Fund et al. v. Megan K. Reilly et al., vacating the earlier ruling of a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit in favor of plaintiffs Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF), California Educators for Medical Freedom (CAEMF), and several individual plaintiffs.
     The reasoning of the court in its latest ruling, as represented by Judge Bennett’s majority opinion, is an affront to all who value truth, justice, the United States Constitution, and logic. Incredibly, the court concluded that as long as a government official believes a vaccine will protect public health, it is irrelevant whether the vaccine actually works. Armed with this rationale, a state government, simply by uttering the words “This is for public health,” can force any individual to submit to a medical treatment, even if that medical treatment does not benefit that individual—and perhaps harms him. The implication of this line of thinking is clear: Government is our absolute ruler, our master, and we are its chattel.
     Here is the context of the ruling: In November 2021, the plaintiffs sued the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) for mandating Covid injections for all employees. We argued that the Covid injections do not stop transmission or infection and therefore lack any public health justification. We contended that Jacobson v. Massachusetts, a Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) case from 1905, did not apply to our case because Jacobson was predicated both on the extreme emergency posed by smallpox—its death rate was 30%, whereas Covid has a 1% rate of death—and on a safe and effective smallpox vaccine that was believed to actually stop the spread of the dreaded disease based on decades of use, therefore providing a public health justification.
     Nearly a year later, in September 2022, the district court ruled against the plaintiffs. But in January 2023 plaintiffs appealed that decision. In June 2024 a three-judge panel ruled in favor of plaintiffs, overturning the district court and remanding the case to the district court. The next month—July 2024—the defendants filed a petition for an en banc review by the Ninth Circuit. That petition was granted in February of 2025 and oral argument was held in front of the 11-judge panel, on March 18, 2025. On July 31, 2025, the Ninth Circuit issued its ruling in favor of the defendants and dismissed the case.
     It bears mentioning that the SCOTUS has overturned decisions rendered by the Ninth Circuit more often than it has any other circuit court in the US. This case amply serves to illustrate precisely why the Ninth has earned such an ignominious reputation.
Indeed, the recent ruling is so egregious that it warrants a thorough breakdown of the main issues:
     {1} The Ninth Circuit asserted that the right to direct one’s own medical treatment is not a fundamental right. It cited several precedents, including Mullins v. Oregon, 57 F.3d 789, 793 (9th Cir. 1995), in which the court held, “Only those aspects of liberty that we as a society traditionally have protected as fundamental are included within the substantive protection of the Due Process Clause.” To be clear, nowhere does our Constitution empower the state to dictate any medical intervention. On the contrary, the Constitution serves as a restraint on government, not on the people. Moreover, there is not a single case in the 120 years since Jacobson when a locality mandated a vaccination or otherwise directed the medical treatment of the people in general. Thus, the Ninth Circuit’s insinuation that our society routinely accepts vaccine mandates for adults in general is patently false.  By this metric and Jacobson’s holding in 1905, women would still not be allowed to vote. In actuality, Jacobson did not allow the state to condition employment or engagement in normal life on receipt of an injection. Instead, it merely allowed the state to impose a fine, not to condition employment or participation in normal life on receipt of an injection.
     {2} The Ninth Circuit not only claimed that Jacobson is binding but it ignored ample and more recent SCOTUS jurisprudence that holds otherwise. In recent decades, SCOTUS has determined that each of us possesses a zone of privacy around us into which the state may not intrude (Griswold v. Connecticut); that each of us has the right to refuse unwanted medical treatment (Washington v. Harper); and that each of us has the right to refuse lifesaving medical treatment (Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health). Yet the Ninth Circuit has dismissed those decisions and has hidden behind the immoral and century-old Jacobson.
     {3} Perhaps most egregious of all its conclusions, the Ninth Circuit held that as long as authorities could reasonably assume the Covid injection had a public benefit, the policy was Constitutional—irrespective of whether the injection worked or whether any claims made by authorities were valid or true. Bennett wrote, “Jacobson holds that the constitutionality of a vaccine mandate, like the Policy here, turns on what reasonable legislative and executive decisionmakers could have rationally concluded about whether a vaccine protects the public’s health and safety, not whether a vaccine actually provides immunity to or prevents transmission of a disease.” But this contention is false.  Jacobson did hinge on the general perception that the smallpox vaccine in particular, and vaccines in general, prevent transmission of disease. Clearly, absent that ability, there is no public health rationale. Most worryingly, by the court’s metric, a lying politician or policymaker can mandate virtually any medical intervention on the American people as long as it is under the guise of public health.
     {4} In Jacobson, the Court reasoned that “in every well-ordered society charged with the duty of conserving the safety of its members the rights of the individual in respect of his liberty may at times, under the pressure of great dangers, be subjected to such restraint, to be enforced by reasonable regulations, as the safety of the general public may demand” (197 U.S. at 30). [Emphasis added.] The Ninth Circuit made a massive stretch by equating the dangers of Covid with the dangers of smallpox. No comparison could be further from the truth. Evidence proves that early spread of Covid had already occurred across much of Los Angeles County by the spring of 2020, when research found that 4% of adults had already had the disease and had recovered from it, thereby negating the need for any preventive measures by late 2021, when the school district’s policy was implemented. In addition, it was widely documented at the time that the dangers of Covid were miniscule for all but the elderly and extremely infirm in comparison to the ravages of smallpox. Because there was provably no great danger from Covid, LAUSD’s injection mandate for employees was completely unreasonable and unjustified.
     {5} In Jacobson, Justice Harlan wrote, “According to settled principles, the police power of a State must be held to embrace, at least, such reasonable regulations established directly by legislative enactment as will protect the public health and the public safety.” Since the Covid injections do not stop transmission or infection, they do not “protect the public health and the public safety” and are not “reasonable”—the Ninth Circuit, or any court for that matter, cannot conclude that Covid injections do protect public health and safety when they do not affect either.
     {6} In further justifying the court’s ruling, Judge Bennett wrote, “The SAC [Second Amended Complaint of plaintiffs] concedes that COVID-19 vaccines “lessen the severity of symptoms for individuals who receive them.” From this, the LAUSD could have reasonably determined that the vaccines would protect the health of its employees.” Here, the Ninth Circuit slyly and dishonestly shifted from public health and safety to the individual health of school district employees. But since when has it ever been a school district’s job to direct the medical treatment of individual employees? Going forward, will LAUSD also mandate that its employees get regular exercise and eight hours of sleep? Will cholesterol-lowering drugs be forced on teachers? Will their consumption of sugar and of alcohol be monitored and regulated? Where does Big Brother stop?
     {7} When a plaintiff files a lawsuit, courts are obligated to accept the truth of the plaintiffs’ allegations at the initial stage of proceedings as long as the claims are plausible. In our case, both the three-judge panel and the dissent in the latest ruling acknowledged that we had plausibly pled that Covid injections do not stop infection or transmission. It is our right, according to the rules, to have the opportunity to prove our case in court. However, the Ninth Circuit robbed us of that right. In addition, the Ninth Circuit’s decision has denied us the right of any plaintiff to dispute the issues of fact in front of the court. If the Ninth Circuit can abdicate its duties and thereby violate the basic principles of our judicial system, what is the point in attempting to resolve disputes in the courts? Moreover, how can any American have faith in our judicial system?
     {8} When a party disagrees with a ruling from a district court, the party may appeal to the circuit court. If a party disagrees with a ruling from the circuit court, the party may petition the circuit court for an en banc review by a broader panel of judges than the small panel. A review of the en banc process in the Ninth Circuit reports, “To qualify for en banc review, the petition must show that the decision of the three-judge panel conflicts with “a decision of the United States Supreme Court,” “an authoritative decision of another United States court of appeals,” or “a decision of the court to which the petition is addressed” and consideration by the full court is “necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the court’s decisions,” or “the proceeding involves one or more questions of exceptional importance.” Rule 40(b)(2)(A)-(D).” None of these conditions were met in our case, yet the rehearing was granted. Was this apparent violation of the rules a politically motivated decision?
     {9} The Ninth Circuit did not even acknowledge that in September 2021 the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had suspiciously timed and conveniently altered its definition of “vaccine” from an injection that prevents disease and produces immunity to the “act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection.” This deceptive move allowed authorities to label Covid injections “vaccines” instead of categorizing them as “gene therapy.” It should be obvious that the public would be reticent to submit to a new gene therapy while it would be more comfortable with a vaccine.
     {10} The Ninth Circuit repeatedly noted that Jacobson allows the legislature and executive decision-makers to enforce reasonable laws to protect public health. But there is no mention of school boards in Jacobson! And the California legislature did not enact any legislation regarding Covid injections. Therefore, pretending the 1905 ruling empowers school boards and legislatures is a fallacious claim. This is another instance of how the Ninth used deceptive sleight-of-hand in reaching its decision.
     There are many more issues with the Ninth Circuit’s recent ruling. But for brevity’s sake, I will make only a few more comments.
     It is remarkable that no Ninth Circuit judge took the time to write a concurrence-especially in light of the tenor of oral argument before the en banc panel in March of 2025. During oral argument, the questions posed by the majority of the judges suggested they favored the arguments of plaintiffs and we left the court feeling very optimistic while counsel for the defendants looked downcast. Yet none of those judges championing the principles during the hearing took the time to write a concurrence in support of the majority opinion. I can only wonder why not.
     The biggest takeaway from the ruling is this: If the state can mandate a medical product under a real or a fake public health scare, can it mandate any medical intervention it chooses? What are the limits of the state’s power? Can it mandate psych meds to improve public morale? How about Adderall to enhance public productivity? Or regulate sugar to improve immunity? And why not forced pregnancy to ensure a stable population base? Of course, all of these dictates would be for the greater good!
     Judge Bennett wrote, “We reject Plaintiffs’ attempt to limit Jacobson to only those vaccines that prevent the spread of a disease and provide immunity.”
     By the court’s logic, there is no limit to the power of the state—a conclusion that should terrify us all. Equally concerning: The Ninth Circuit has abdicated its power and authority to hold public servants accountable. When the courts cannot be relied upon to hold public servants accountable, who can? And where does that leave us?
     As Judge Lee wrote in the fitting conclusion to his powerful dissent, “As a practical matter, I fear we are giving the government a blank check to foist health treatment mandates on the people—despite its checkered track record—when we should be imposing a check against the government’s incursion into ou
r liberties.
0 Comments

Q and A Update

7/18/2025

0 Comments

 

Some Questions and Answers

Picture
1- What is the Medical Freedom Amendment?
2- Is there a historical basis for the MFA enactment?
3- How does the MFA affect practitioners?
4- How does the MFA interact with Public Health?
5- How does the MFA protect the Individual's medical choice?
6- What are the current dangers to medical freedom and informed consent?
7- How does it become an Amendment?
8- Who supports the MFA as it moves forward?
9- How can people get involved and support it?
10- How necessary is it to act now?
 
1- What is the Medical Freedom Amendment?
     It is the proposed 28th Amendment in two paragraphs styled after the First and Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution. It reads:


"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive order, emergency declaration, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.

Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive order, emergency declaration, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."


     Medical Freedom is the individual's absolute and inalienable right to autonomy over one's body regarding all medical treatment. The amendment presents a wall of opposition against all government medical interventions to an Individual except under specific and qualifying stipulations and conditions.  
2- Is there a historical basis for the MFA enactment?
     Yes, the Founding Fathers included a few doctors. They petitioned the Constitutional Convention to include a Medical Freedom Amendment. Most famous is Doctor Benjamin Rush,  a signer of the Declaration of Independence, friend to Thomas Paine, personal physician to Benjamin Franklin and George Washington, and the Nation’s first Surgeon General. He recognized how easily medical tyranny could develop in the country and was a devoted proponent of medical freedom stating: “Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship…”
     If it were possible for those Founding Fathers of liberty and independence to have foreseen the future of the medical abuses of Dr. Mengele and Nazi Germany happening 200 hundred years in the future, it is most certain a medical freedom amendment would already be included in the United States Constitution.
3- How does the MFA affect practitioners?
     The patient-physician partnership is a one-on-one relationship making clinical care decisions, with the patient reserving ultimate authority to decide.
Your clinical care decisions must not be predetermined by government bureaucrats, statistical analyses, industry influence, insurance carriers, or other outside influences. As an individual there are many factors to be considered, and other factors forbidden.
     Coercion of any manner, including bribery, incentives, threats, extortion, public shaming, scapegoating, exclusion or ostracism from society are illegal and unethical. Also, deceptive advertising applied to patients or health care providers, is a violation.
4- How does the MFA interact with Public Health?
     Public Health is extremely important and the major factor for reducing chronic diseases. It does this by seeking and identifying causes of disease and eliminating or remediating the problem. It has been tremendously successful in its work with the environment in the past, especially in sanitation a major cause for the reduction of epidemics and disease.
     Presently pollution is the number one cause of chronic disease. Pollution is broad and covers electromagnetic radiation pollution, chemical and pharmaceutical pollution, genetically modified organisms of bioengineering, and chemical trails of geoengineering pollution, agricultural and manufacturing pollution. Unfortunately, Public Health turns a blind eye, or legislation is created to protect the guilty. As a result, pollutants are sprayed, injected, radiated, exploded and spread without medical choice, or informed consent. We do not need a war on cancer. We need to mitigate the causes of cancer!
     However, today Public Health has taken on the role of Private health using its powers erroneously with nefarious intentions when it denies medical freedom and informed consent. Public Health ignores the effects of electromagnetic radiation pollution and is no longer acting to stop chemical and genetic modification dangers in the environment. Public Health now acts as judge and jury for the relationship of the patient and practitioner endangering individual health.
5- How does the MFA protect the Individual's medical choice?
     Medical choice emphasizes an Individual’s right to make decisions about their healthcare, including treatment options, providers, and interventions, or nothing at all.
There is an overlap between medical choice and informed consent, emphasizing that informed decision-making is a key aspect of exercising medical choice.
     In the Nuremberg Code of 1947  after World War II Medical Informed Consent is the very first point. It is a Rule of Law that ensures the Individual has the right to be fully informed and comprehend the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a medical intervention before deciding.
Informed Consent is the most critical issue of the 21st century. It is the cornerstone of medical freedom, individual health and medical choice. As a Rule of Law, it cannot be pre-empted nor is it conditional. Therefore, there are no actions restraining its actions and enforcement.
6- What are the current dangers to medical freedom and informed consent?
     There have been several cases involving children where without or against parental consent were physically forced COVID-19 vaccination. These cases found the courts’ rulings in favor of the government meanwhile stating their decisions were egregious, knowing they were morally and ethically wrong.
     In 1906 the Flexner Report was issued financed by John D Rockefeller, the richest man in the world at the time, and Andrew Carnegie, the second richest, to study the German medical profession based on scientific principles of the 20th century. The Flexner Report gave detailed regulations of education and pharmacology as the only solution against diseases. All medical research must adhere fully to the protocols of scientific research of the 1910 materialism, medication, and vaccination. Within 10 years the number of medical schools dropped from 650 to 50, the number of medical students decreased from 7500 to 2500. With advances in biochemistry, bionutrition, and biophysics this view of the world allopathic medicine will become outdated yet maintained today.
     1927 the Food and Drug Administration is created out of the Bureau of Chemistry. Its goal is to promote pharmaceutical products and stop any products that compete in the marketplace.
In 1997 the World Health Organization of the United Nations obtained full control over medicine for all 196 Nation members. The power of the Flexner Report is worldwide and allopathic medical care the world standard, yet Homeopathy is used more than any other medical aid.
     The Telecommunications Act of 1996 placed medical health outside the powers of medical science into the hands of engineers of the wireless industry. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had already determined the dangers of EMR pollution. This enables the wireless industry unlimited expansion while exposing the entire population to electromagnetic radiation interictal spike pulsations so highly multiplied and strong they initiate every conceivable illness, cancer, while harming plants, animals, insects, and the atmosphere.
     Now in 2025 the WHO is eliminating human rights, informed consent, dignity, and medical freedom by new laws that seek to develop and authorize unlicensed drugs and vaccines without due process of law, nor protects individual’s medical freedom and economic rights. The new laws seeks to provide a liability shield for these unlicensed products from legal actions.
  • Vaccine Injury Act of 1986
    • Manufacturers Cannot Be Sued for Injury or Death caused by a vaccine. Claiming vaccines are not safe and effective as a defense, but saying they are when being used as an experiment on the general population and without informed consent.
  • USA Patriot Act of 2001
    • Provides Emergency Use Act by military intervention
    • Emergency Use Authorizations as Countermeasures
  • The PREP Act of 2005
    • Provides immunity from suit and liability under Federal and State law
    • Approves forced medication and vaccination countermeasures
    • Denies Informed Consent
  • The FDA (Food and Drug Administration)
    • Spring 2022 removed some VAERS reports (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System)
    • Adopt "Future Framework" allowing reformulations of shots without clinical trials
    • Effective January 23rd, 2024, not to require Informed Consent. Certified Government Publishing Office 88228
7- How does it become an Amendment?
     There are two ways to propose and ratify amendments to the United States Constitution as defined under Article V. One is two-thirds of both houses of Congress can vote to propose an amendment. Second, two-thirds of the state legislatures can ask  Congress to call a national convention to propose the adding of amendments.
     To ratify amendments, three-fourths of the state legislatures must approve them. Another option are ratifying conventions in three-fourths of the states must approve them. The Supreme Court has stated ratification must be within "some reasonable time after the proposal."
     Starting with the passage of the 18th amendment, Congress set a definite period for ratification. A period of seven years was established in the case of the 18th, 20th, 21st, and 22nd amendments.
     However, there has been no determination as to just how long a "reasonable time" can or should be for passage of a new amendment.
8- Who supports the MFA as it moves forward?
     The first to support and endorse the Medical Freedom Amendment is the National Health Federation (NHF). They have continued to provide within their magazine a Medical Freedom Amendment Broadcast column. They also have within their website provided a campaign that anyone can take part found by clicking Current Campaigns button on their Home Page. The interest in moving forward with the Amendment has grown and now more than ever is needed.
It is an honor to present before the Functional Diagnostic Nutrition organization and the support of Reed Davis in inviting this presentation of the Medical Freedom Amendment.
9- How can people get involved and support it?
     The NHF website provides a campaign that anyone can use by clicking Current Campaigns button on their Home Page, thenhf.com. Scott Tips NHF President and the Board of Governors have unanimously endorsed the Amendment. The movement forward is growing and more than ever it needs public support
https://thenhf.com/current-campaigns/
10- How necessary is it to act now?
     Tedros Ghebreyesus Director of WHO and Bill Gates are in tandem as they begin their draconian actions with WHO Member Nations. The most recent addition took place in Singapore. On May 5th, 2025, Bill Gates announced at the Philanthropy Asia Summit 2025, that the Gates Foundation would open a new Asia office in Singapore supported by the Singapore Economic Development Board.
     Coincidentally, it was reminded of its recent passage of new amendments to Singapore’s Infectious Disease Act (IDA). These changes declare the government’s right to forced vaccination whenever they declare it necessary for public health. Citizens who decline government-ordered vaccinations can face six to twelve months in jail and fines from US $7,000  to $15,000.
     Also, the government authorized forced vaccination under Section 47 of the IDA with the power to force vaccination of citizens if an “outbreak of an infectious disease in any area of Singapore is imminent.” Good-bye body autonomy, hello search and seizure…
These laws and rules give the Director-General of Health complete control over medical freedom, medical rights, medical choice, medical  privacy, and informed consent.
     This is the direction that state governments throughout the world are viewing the rights of medical choice, medical privacy, medical freedom, and informed consent. We must act as soon as possible to protect these rights from denial.
-Michael LeVesque-

0 Comments

The Unmentionable "Medical Freedom"

6/26/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture

Congress is Afraid of the Words "Medical Freedom"

What is the Medical Freedom Amendment?
     It is the proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution in two paragraphs styled after the First and Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution. It reads:

     "All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive order, emergency declaration, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.
     Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive order, emergency declaration, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."


     Medical Freedom is the individual's absolute and inalienable right to autonomy over one's body regarding all medical treatment. The amendment presents a wall of opposition against all government medical interventions to an Individual except under specific and qualifying stipulations and conditions.

Why is Congress afraid of the words "Medical Freedom"?
     There is an understanding amongst all Members of Congress that "medical freedom" is a death tomb for re-election. Their re-election depends on the medical pharmaceutical cabals donations or they can be used to fight against their re-election. It is that simple.
     That is why the only way to make "medical freedom" a household word is to repeat it everywhere and at every opportunity with every governmental interaction until the phrase has weight and strength that overcomes the economic stranglehold and insures public support for re-election of current or new members of government.
     Elected officials are there to serve the public and societies best interests. Once they become ensconced in the system they are no longer fully doing their job. We have a responsibility to act and require such behavior from our legislator and executive that benefits us and our children.
     As Thomas Paine wrote in Common Sense, the book that made the United States "revolution" a public commitment and united the colonists to fight for "independence" and self determination.
 
 
 "Society in every state is a blessing, but government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one; for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries by a government, which we might expect in a country without a government, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer!"

Is there a historical basis for the MFA enactment?
     Yes, the Founding Fathers included a few doctors. They petitioned the Constitutional Convention to include a Medical Freedom Amendment. Most famous is Doctor Benjamin Rush,  a signer of the Declaration of Independence, friend to Thomas Paine, personal physician to Benjamin Franklin and George Washington, and the Nation’s first Surgeon General. He recognized how easily medical tyranny could develop in the country and was a devoted proponent of medical freedom stating: “Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship…”

How does the MFA affect practitioners and private health?
     The patient-physician partnership is a one-on-one relationship making clinical care decisions, with the patient reserving ultimate authority to decide.
Clinical care decisions must not be predetermined by government bureaucrats, statistical analyses, industry influence, insurance carriers, or other outside influences.
     Coercion of any manner, including bribery, incentivization, threats, extortion, public shaming, scapegoating, exclusion or ostracization from society, and deceptive advertising applied to patients or health care providers, violates patient autonomy.


How does the MFA interact with Public Health?
     Public Health is extremely important and the major factor for reducing chronic diseases. It does this by seeking and identifying causes of disease and eliminating or remediating the problem. It has been tremendously successful in its work with the environment in the past, especially in sanitation a major cause for the reduction of epidemics and disease.
     Presently pollution is the number one cause of chronic disease. It is a corporate induced poisoning. Pollution is broad and covers industrial pollution, electromagnetic radiation pollution, chemical and pharmaceutical pollution, genetically modified organisms of bioengineering, and chemical trails of geoengineering pollution, agricultural and manufacturing pollution. Unfortunately, Public Health is coerced or legislation is created to protect the polluters. As a result, pollutants are sprayed, injected, radiated, exploded and spread without medical choice, or informed consent. We do not need a war on cancer. We need to mitigate the causes of cancer!
     Most damaging is that Public Health takes on the role of Private Health using its powers erroneously with nefarious intentions when it denies medical freedom and informed consent. Public Health ignores the effects of electromagnetic radiation pollution and is no longer acting to stop chemical and genetic modification dangers in the environment. Public Health now acts as judge and jury for the relationship of the patient and practitioner endangering individual health.


How does the MFA protect the Individual's medical choice?
     Medical choice emphasizes an Individual’s right to make decisions about their healthcare, including treatment options, providers, and interventions, or doing nothing at all. There is an overlap between medical choice and informed consent, emphasizing that informed decision-making is a key aspect of exercising medical choice.
     In the Nuremberg Code of 1947 after World War II Medical Informed Consent is the very first point. It is a Rule of Law that ensures the Individual has the right to be fully informed and comprehend the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a medical intervention before deciding. As a Rule of Law, it cannot be pre-empted nor is it conditional. Therefore, there are no actions restraining its actions and enforcement.
     Informed Consent is the most critical issue of the 21st century. It is the cornerstone of medical freedom, individual health and medical choice.


What are the current dangers to medical freedom and informed consent?
     There have been several cases involving children who without or against parental consent were physically forced COVID-19 vaccinations. These courts’ rulings in favor of the government had one court admitting its decision was egregious, knowing it was morally and ethically wrong.
     In 1906 the Flexner Report was issued financed by John D Rockefeller, the richest man in the world at the time, and Andrew Carnegie, the second richest, to study the German medical profession based on scientific principles of the 20th century.
     The Flexner Report gave detailed regulations of education and pharmacology as the only solution against diseases. It enshrines that all medical research must adhere fully to the protocols of scientific research of the 1910 materialism, medication, and vaccination. 
     Within 10 years the number of medical schools dropped from 650 to 50, the number of medical students decreased from 7500 to 2500. With advances in biochemistry, bionutrition, and biophysics this view of the world allopathic medicine will become outdated yet maintained today.
     In 1927 the Food and Drug Administration was created out of the Bureau of Chemistry. Its goal was and is to promote pharmaceutical products and stop any products that compete in the marketplace.
     In 1997 the World Health Organization of the United Nations obtained full control over medicine for all 196 Nation members. The power of the Flexner Report is now worldwide and allopathic medical care the world standard, yet Homeopathy is used more than any other medicine throughout the world.
     The Telecommunications Act of 1996 placed medical health outside the powers of medical science into the hands of engineers of the wireless industry. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had already determined the dangers of EMR pollution. This enables the wireless industry unlimited expansion while exposing the entire population to electromagnetic radiation interictal spike pulsations so highly multiplied and strong they initiate every conceivable illness, cancer, while harming plants, animals, insects, and the atmosphere. The link to mitochondrial health makes it a basis for health.
     Now in 2025, the WHO is eliminating human rights, informed consent, dignity, and medical freedom by new laws that seek to develop and authorize unlicensed drugs and vaccines without due process of law, nor protects individual’s medical freedom and economic rights. The new laws seeks to provide a liability shield for these unlicensed products from legal actions.
  • Vaccine Injury Act of 1986
    • Manufacturers Cannot Be Sued for Injury or Death caused by a vaccine. Claiming vaccines are not safe and effective as a defense, but saying they are when being used as an experiment on the general population and without informed consent.
  • USA Patriot Act of 2001
    • Provides Emergency Use Act by military intervention
    • Emergency Use Authorizations as Countermeasures
  • The PREP Act of 2005
    • Provides immunity from suit and liability under Federal and State law
    • Approves forced medication and vaccination countermeasures
    • Denies Informed Consent
  • The FDA (Food and Drug Administration)
    • Spring 2022 removed some VAERS reports (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System)
    • Adopt "Future Framework" allowing reformulations of shots without clinical trials
    • Effective January 23rd, 2024, not to require Informed Consent. Certified Government Publishing Office 88228 
     The cruelties of the present system to the health and welfare of we, the citizens, defines itself in the current state of health America finds itself. The first step is freedom and true facts. The many who are accused of "conspiracy theories" are the truly the "whistle blowers" of medical science and health.

How does it become an Amendment?
     There are two ways to propose and ratify amendments to the United States Constitution as defined under Article V. One is two-thirds of both houses of Congress can vote to propose an amendment. Second, two-thirds of the state legislatures can ask  Congress to call a national convention to propose the adding of amendments.
     To ratify amendments, three-fourths of the state legislatures must approve them. Another option are ratifying conventions in three-fourths of the states must approve them. The Supreme Court has stated ratification must be within "some reasonable time after the proposal."
     Starting with the passage of the 18th amendment, Congress set a definite period for ratification. A period of seven years was established in the case of the 18th, 20th, 21st, and 22nd amendments. However, there has been no determination as to just how long a "reasonable time" can or should be for passage of a new amendment.


Who supports the MFA as it moves forward?
     The first to support and endorse the Medical Freedom Amendment is the National Health Federation (NHF). They have continued to provide within their magazine a Medical Freedom Amendment Broadcast column. They also have within their website provided a campaign that anyone can use by clicking Current Campaigns button on their Home Page.
Another active group is the Physicians and Practitioners Reclaiming Medicine (PPRM).


How can people get involved and support it?
     The NHF website provides a campaign that anyone can use by clicking Current Campaigns button on their Home Page, https://thenhf.com/current-campaigns/. Scott Tips NHF President and the Board of Governors have unanimously endorsed the Amendment. The movement forward is growing and more than ever it needs public support.
     The website theMedicalFreedomAmendment.org provides a petition, a letter and links for writing your representatives and government officials. 


How necessary is it to act now?
     Tedros Ghebreyesus Director of WHO and Bill Gates are in tandem as they begin their draconian actions with WHO Member Nations. The most recent addition took place in Singapore. On May 5th, 2025, Bill Gates announced at the Philanthropy Asia Summit 2025, that the Gates Foundation would open a new Asia office in Singapore supported by the Singapore Economic Development Board.
Coincidentally, within hours, the government announced the passage of new amendments to Singapore’s Infectious Disease Act (IDA).
     These changes declare the government’s right to forced vaccination whenever they declare it necessary for public health. Citizens who decline government-ordered vaccinations can face six to twelve months in jail and fines from US $7,000  to $15,000.
     The government authorized forced vaccination under Section 47 of the IDA with the power to force vaccination of citizens if an “outbreak of an infectious disease in any area of Singapore is imminent.” -- Good-bye body autonomy, hello search and seizure…
     These laws and rules give the Director-General of Health complete control over medical freedom, medical rights, medical choice, medical  privacy, and informed consent.
               
  Now Is The Time
     At present a slot of time exists where HHS Secretary Kennedy is seeking reform. The opportunity to write him directly as HHS Secretary gives him direction and cause to speak the unspeakable - "Medical Freedom."
Now is the time to act.
-Michael LeVesque-

0 Comments

Medical Totalitarianism Is Clicking Its Heels

5/24/2025

0 Comments

 

Time Is of Essence

Picture
     There is a point of no return, a point when the actions of today will be so damaging to ourselves and our children and the following generations that to regain those losses will be impossible. We are witnessing the dangerous overthrow of human rights, personal freedoms, environmental safeguards, and health. One need only witness the growing states of damage to our children and others around us.
     Legislation is appearing in every country infringing on personal freedom and health. The most recent blatant and obvious egregious legislation has come out of Singapore after a visit from Bill Gates and Tedros Gebreyesus focusing once again on vaccination.
     The most basic personal right and freedom is body autonomy. Without that the entire house shifts, sways, and crumbles. Without health we become feeble, weakened, and passive. The most important foundation of health is Nature, and from that comes intelligence, energy, and strength.
     The Medical Freedom Amendment is a beacon, a call, an absolute necessity in these most dangerous times. The link of health and medicine is intimately bound together for our benefit. It is a cherished relationship that requires body autonomy, informed consent, medical choice, medical freedom, medical privacy, and liberty. Adhering to these necessary rights and freedoms, governmental medical intervention is not allowable.
     Public health uses its powers erroneously with nefarious intentions when it denies medical freedom and informed consent. Public health’s role is to seek causes of diseases and eliminate or remediate the problem. Public health is not a judge and jury. They have no role in the private health and the relationship of the Individual to their health care provider. The government can only under clear and specific legal requirements and conditions deny our rights, privacy, and freedoms. That is only under emergency situations that still require judicial necessities as enumerated in the Medical Freedom Amendment.
     A report from The People’s Voice shows the movement towards government totalitarian control of health and medicine. Recently Bill Gates of the Gates Foundation and Tedros Gebreyesus, the Director of the World Health Organization (WHO) of the United Nations (UN) completed a two-day visit to Singapore. They met with the Prime Minister Lawrence Wong and Senior Ministers Lee Hsein Loong and Teo Chee Hean.
     On May 5th, 2025, Bill Gates announced at the Philanthropy Asia Summit 2025, that the Gates Foundation would open a new Asia office in Singapore supported by the Singapore Economic Development Board.
     Coincidentally, announcement was made focusing on the the passage of new amendments to Singapore’s Infectious Disease Act (IDA). These changes declare the government’s right to forced vaccination whenever they declare it necessary for public health. Citizens who decline government-ordered vaccinations can face six to twelve months in jail and fines from US $7,000 to $15,000.
     Also, the government authorized forced vaccination under Section 47 of the IDA with the power to force vaccination of citizens if an “outbreak of an infectious disease in any area of Singapore is imminent.” Good-bye body autonomy, hello search and seizure.
    These laws and rules give the Director-General of Health complete control over medical freedom, medical rights, medical choice, medical privacy, and informed consent. These are the very essence of personal health that need protection which are the basis of the Medical Freedom Amendment.
     Here is a copy of the new egregious Rules in Singapore:

Picture
     This enactment clearly shows the unrelenting movement of totalitarian control of health and medicine by the government. The necessity to move forward rigorously for medical protection under the Medical Freedom Amendment (MFA) as the proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution is essential:
    
"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.
     Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."

     Time and responsibility are upon us. There is a window of opportunity that can provide this required and insurmountable achievement. We have no choice except to protect choice – no freedom except to protect freedom – no rights except to protect rights - no knowledge except to protect informed consent – no protection except to have precautionary principles.
     Support the MedicalFreedomAmendmnet.org by spreading its message and provide donations to the National Health Federation in its work to promote the MFA and support its campaign (page 2) with your Congressional Representatives.

-Michael LeVesque-
0 Comments

What does it really mean?

4/10/2025

0 Comments

 

The Hurdle to Medical Freedom

Picture
     How is it that many share the idea of medical freedom yet are unmotivated to pursuing an Amendment to the United States Constitution to protect and guarantee medical freedom?
     There are many hurdles to gaining mass appeal for the movement. Most people lack knowledge for self care and fear for their health when they become sick or acquire a disease. The response is to seek professional care based on a strong belief system and allegiance. However, when the results snowball into more problems and a continual use of pharmaceuticals they feel trapped and powerless.
     Medical freedom brings forth competition as a necessity for medical choice and informed consent. Presently, there is a medical monopoly which fills the media with its advertisements and directs people to a doctor that is part of the pharmaceutical system. This has resulted in controlled choices, that are narrow and outdated.
     Medical freedom has meaning when one comprehends the essence of medical choice. It is there that the door opens to information, education, self-care and medical alternatives. Presently people lack experience and education of what to do when ill. One could compare this situation to vassals or slaves having no comprehension of land ownership and its requirements and rewards. Once those individuals experience land ownership and freedom it becomes a necessary part of their life even though it entails added responsibility.
     This explains why you find people in health food or vitamin businesses with experiences where nutrition, herbs, homeopathy or some other form of medical practice changed their lives. Their knowledge opened a world of health and medicine that became an integral part of their daily existence.
     When health freedom came under severe attack in the 1990s advocates united. Due to the substantial number of mom-and-pop health food stores throughout the country and alternative health care providers, their experiences enlightened the public and ignited medical freedom creating the passage of the Dietary Supplement Health Education Act (DSHEA) as a law of the Nation.
      Nevertheless, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) treated their enforceable responsibility of manufacturers with disdain and draconian treatment. The FDA tried in any way possible to reduce competition with drugs and therapeutic information. This is a great disservice to the citizens and has reduced the marketplace for innovation, sharing of knowledge (which was one of the major goals of DSHEA), other health care practitioners, and self-care.
      We now need as a goal, more than ever, to share those experiences once again with everyone.This is paramount and would guarantee a population actively demanding protection of medical freedom and other schools of medical knowledge. Long term goal is to include medical freedom and care into the education of all young people.
     Under such circumstances, there would no longer be an allopathic monopoly of medical science engaged solely in promoting allopathic orientation and institutions. The world would be thankful and rightfully so. The present system can be quite abominable and inept.
     The many stories that I have heard throughout my time as a merchant, as a friend, and within a family have produced much medical anguish. Every person has a story to tell. Many have suffered and have no idea what other possibilities exist, the possible therapeutics, or the necessary self-maintenance to be employed due to lack of education.
     With knowledge of these methods, therapies and schools of medicine one can ensure longevity and robust health fostering the recognition and necessity for medical freedom. The monetary savings would be enormous, beyond comprehension. Homeopathy, for example, has proven to be more effective than vaccination and at 10% of the cost.
     The Medical Freedom Amendment requires a national effort to educate. Knowledge ignites the power of free speech and protection of the individual from search and seizure which includes medical privacy. The Medical Freedom Amendment must secure its place in the Bill of Rights strengthening the First and Fourth amendment of the United States Constitution.
     We have a unique opportunity for those who practice self-care, health care practitioners,  and advocates of freedom to unite and create public awareness and pursue the goal of medical freedom as the 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution. If we can get 15% of the population engaged and active for this Amendment it can become reality.
Here is the Medical Freedom Amendment:

     "All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive order, emergency declaration, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment."
     "Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive order, emergency declaration, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."

     Support the Amendment by going to https://thenhf.com/pass-the-medical-freedom-amendment/  and support the National Health Federation.

-Michael LeVesque-

0 Comments

Did the United States Lose World War II?

3/18/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture

A Raging Battle Gains Momentum
 - a personal viewpoint -

     At the end of World War II, the United States was the healthiest country in the world according to reports. Today the USA ranks the lowest of the industrialized nations and below other less industrialized countries. What happened to our pristine waters, healthy soil, blue skies and robust energy, courage, brilliance, and health? How did we so quickly become a sick Nation with so many health problems?
     We are a Nation developing fears and biases. We have become pharmaceutical addicts, medicated over and over. We are surrounded by polluted water filled with plastics, cast off drugs, fluorosilicic acid and food filled with genetically modified organisms, now called bio-engineered food, antibiotics, insecticides, disinfectants, fungicides, virucides, hormones and 100,000 new chemicals added to our land never seen in Nature.
      Food we eat is genetically modified and engineered. We are given modified RNA viral computerized GMO injections. We observe skies filled with chemical trails, and and call it geoengineering done without informed consent. We are continually exposed to a wall of electromagnetic radiation energy higher than anywhere else on this planet - all generated by corporations in a state of arrogance, bias, indifference, greed, and ignorance seeking wealth and control. Our Leaders are bought and directed in producing executive orders undermining legislative oversight while the legislatures struggle to comprehend the dire situation and refuse to work together and tied to lobbyists monetary support.
     How did we come to do this to ourselves? We did not want this outcome. It was foisted, manipulated, and sold to those who govern and propagandized to those who elect. There are theories of what went wrong, and explanations are sometimes correct and insightful. However, the purpose here is to consider an actual conspiracy that others have touched upon and perhaps revealed before. Conspiracy is a secret plan made by two or more people to do something bad, illegal, or against someone’s wishes.
      Covid-19 might easily fit into that category, The bombing of the Twin Towers fits that category, the deaths of Martin Luther King Jr., Robert F. Kennedy and President John F. Kennedy fit that category. Whether the true facts of those conspiracies are known is a different matter since a dark veil hides events under lock and key. Nevertheless, bits of truth leak out. There are many who have felt the pressure and the results of saying and knowing too much.
      So, consider a national conspiracy or narrow it down to a corporate conspiracy and a touch of nationalism? This is giving away clues and hopefully in the next few sentences it will become obvious. Is there a national character that has its own ego? Is fascism behind the uncontrolled move to displace democracy?
     Let us say the leadership moved into positions of power to influence certain essential industries such as agriculture, health/medicine, environment, communication, media and used its well-honed techniques of propaganda and coercion on a young gullible nation like the United States seeking to overturn democratic processes and bring the country into a state of colonialism.
    The US citizens believe in democracy and that the government looks out for people and benefits society as much as possible. That it is important to be law abiding, respectful, and supportive. This mind of the good citizen believes in hard work and tolerates differences. It also is young and naive, prone to comfort and apathy.
     Of course, to be a good citizen does not necessarily make you a right citizen, in fact it could make you a wrong citizen if you did not know the truth, the facts and full details. You might raise your hand in sworn allegiance to something you would never agree to if you knew the whole truth and facts. You may develop a hatred that has no place except in bias.
     This especially begins to have full meaning when you have a population getting all their information from the now controlled news of the day, the entertaining talk shows, the scripted news media and mainstream movies, the latest celebrity, the gearing up of events to come, the games and gossip, the talking heads telling you what to think of what you just saw. When the message is controlled and the media becomes a series of manipulated messages. Do you think or want something because you really want it or think that way, or is it because you are told to want or think a certain way?
     Presently, the techniques developed and exploited by the artists of information may have pulled the blinds over critical thought and directed the mind into a trough of misdirection and influence. Those pushing the buttons have egos of superiority, a super race complex, and a desire to control and subjugate. One name that comes to mind immediately is the nephew of Sigmund Freud, Edward Bernays, whose specialty of propaganda reflected his disgust and low opinion of the masses. He worked diligently and behind the scenes manipulating American desires and thoughts for the benefits of advertisers. It is reported however he denied Nazi Germany his assistance when they called upon him.
     Germany’s goal has been to regain its stature as a colonial power after its losses from the Versailles Treaty. Instead, even worse, it was defeated by the United States and done so with panache. After WWII Germany suffered further denigration because of the pharmaceutical/chemical drug industry's ruthless participation in biological studies with children and the extermination of people in its full participation in the Third Reich as proven in the Trials of Nuremberg. At which point the world saw first hand fascism in its true nature.
     This protected profit driven industry was the financial strength of Germany and produced chemicals, pharmaceutical products, and scientific experimentation for the world. It was intertwined with American interests as well.It was a monopolistic industry. It also influenced systems of research, subjugation and propaganda steering the population to a different path than which it was on prior to World War II. Economic fears and unrest aided the unrest and searching for a leader who exposed their fears and promised to quell them.
     Russia also suffered greatly in WWII and helped end Nazi dominance. It is of the old world and experienced revolution and authoritarian government and were strongly opposed to re-unifying Germany since it too sought other countries territories. Russia under the rule of a ruthless leader also would not tolerate any opposition to the goals and rules as state sponsored communism became totalitarianism.
     After the Berlin wall came down and Germany was reunited many events developed  and agreements met to form the European Union and institute the Euro as a singular common currency a reminder of the goal of the Third Reich. When Nation States lose control of their currency they no longer control their economic futures and Europe became a rotating scoreboard of who has the cheapest labor costs for industry. Changes take place as cheap labor moves from country to country leaving empty factories and warehouses in the wake. Despair and anger rise to new heights and civil unrest becomes routine as groups struggle with economic chaos and rotating economic disruption fueling fear and anger refueling new fascism and nationalism to divide people.
     The Individual is stressed and fearful as new powers rise and seek control. Now ruthless acts destroy rights, economy, and freedom. The Rule of Law, the Precautionary Principle, and Informed Consent are dashed to the ground. The International corporations swing the wrecking ball destroying small independent businesses similar to what happened in Germany. Fascism and totalitarianism knows how to breed fear and use it effectively creating rules and regulations that spread anger and fear through epidemic diseases creating irrational thought and behavior and destroying any other health alternatives and therapies.
     When the Zionist moved to Palestine, Nazi Germany honored them with a congratulatory plaque. The Zionist became the haven for the struggle of the new liberation but at the expense of taking away sovereignty of someone else's territory.  The scientific and military struggle emerged to control all Israelis citizens and neighbors into an era of wealth sprinkled with fascism, apartheid and division. It was in a sense an extension of Germany, a center of biosciences and technology, a corporate haven for European investment.
     When partition of Palestine was first suggested the United States President Harry S. Truman was completely against it. He knew such a thing causes hostility and division of people. It is not unlike Mahatma Gandhi who opposed the division of India into Pakistan and India. He knew that horrible results would take place, and terror did rein forth on both country's futures destroying solidarity and tolerance of neighbors who had earlier lived peacefully together. Finally gaining independence from Britain was a bittersweet catastrophe.
     Tel Aviv is now one of the most expensive cities in the world. Major corporations reside there and grow the new biosciences of tomorrow. The Israeli corporate interconnection of wealth and power with Germany and other nations involved in the biosciences and AI provide wealth that enable a war with impunity matching the historical actions of Germany while the world watches horrified as it did with Nazi Germany as all hell is released.
    This is in no way condoning the actions of the Palestinian State. Radical hatred enrages each other and leadership reflects wrong decisions and management for peace. Negotiation should have been immediate with the attack on Israel and release of hostages. War is the most insane waste of resources possible and unnecessary suffering determined by arrogant leadership.
     As for the United States, it has become a colony of the new Corporate Fascism. A fascism that dumps its pharmaceutical products costing billions to produce trillions in wealth for its owners and bankers who watch a national debt at bursting levels growing like a rampant cancer dispossessing and poisoning its customers. The medical debt outweighs all else and will only increase because of the chosen course. Will political action revise or reverse the momentum or will that be denied by the government representatives owned by corporations who defend their egeregious attacks on health.
     Now the move is set and gaining momentum as it winds its way through the halls of governments and treaties and agreements by the United Nations World Health Organization determined to overcome all opposition to impale the world on the lance of totalitarianism, corruption, and disruption of health. How unimaginable, dreadful and ignorant.
     Yes, the USA has new owners, we are colonized and we are the serfs. The designated home of the World Economic Council is Berlin, Germany. It promises a bright wonderful future for the few remaining and most probably will use the biased elusive AI as its law of authority and discrimination, and for what goal?
     We won the battle of World War II and are losing our health and wealth. We are the Nation that has allowed international corporations to control our health, allowed corporations the freedom of speech, and allowed pharmaceutical advertising into our homes and the wireless mesh into our homes.
    Do you notice how easily big box stores fell into compliance during CXOVID-19? That's the goal, to diffuse the rugged independence of the American spirit and produce the corporate subservient structure for the world.
     This has provided the international pharmaceutical cartels power over the content of the news and information regarding health. We have designated German allopathic medical science to rule our medical schools and orientation. We are the country that allowed the wealthy to determine our medical freedom through the Flexner Report of 1910.
     We are the Nation that excels at developing debt without consequence and government agencies without oversight. We deny the use of the precautionary principle as the environment gets poisoned and electrified and filled with synthetic elements beyond our control. We do not hear other public voices of factual criticisms or alternatives unless broadcast on major media. There is a side that knows things are wrong and not right, but remains in a state of catatonia.
     Still, there are many individuals from all walks of life and all political persuasions fighting to be heard and resisting a fait accompli. Let us all grasp and comprehend our innate intelligence to be strong and magnify vision, listening, communicating, joining together to be courageously bold and fearless in defending our liberty, rights, freedom, and health.
     We are not fooled by this wall of control that tells us "It is the best for us all." We must comprehend that it is a long road ahead to gain control and protection of our health. Most health problems emanate from a sick environment in which we live. Nature must be protected for us to be safe and revive.
     We must have leadership by one who respects our values and seeks sanity with a firm grasp of reality, insight, and reverence for life. One who is fearless against the shouts of totalitarian controllers of our environment. We need one who seeks peace and health without endangering our presence. We as citizens can take an immediate step by uniting to require the passage of the Medical Freedom Amendment. We must protect our children and ourselves from medical enslavement and disease. This is a necessary and immediate first step.
     This will allay and provide legal defense against the rush into medical experimentation, and surveillance by the government. It will provide the opportunity to see and hear the facts that are so well hidden and unspoken. Once accomplished the big fight begins. Suddenly, every type of medical law and agency needs revamping, and every treaty re-negotiated or ended. This is an endless battle never to end, going on and on, and on and on….
     The Medical Freedom Amendment is a beginning solution to regain Our government and Our health. We are now in the midst of the second Revolutionary War of the People, for the People and by the People. It reads as follows:


      "All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment."
     "Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents.
"

     The destruction of medical freedom along with denying informed consent is the most important singular issue facing us. Adding Medical Freedom to the Bill of Rights must move forward with confidence and determination. This is the most important and necessary means to have health freedom and restore control over our lives.
     As a political issue it requires rapid response. We must know every Representative's voting position. Only by knowing our Representative’s position on this issue can we powerfully respond politically by the vote we each possess.
     Knowing each Representative's position allows us to focus on this single political issue. Yes, or No. Our vote becomes powerful and crystal clear – Will it be Medical Freedom now and forever or "business as usual" as we hit rock bottom?
     Physically take the Questionnaire to the Representative’s office. Demand an answer. Use your positive action, verve to receive a response. Let us know at our email [email protected] or use the address* below to mail us information.
Letter to Your Representative with the MFA Questionnaire
Petition to circulate with all contacts.  
 *You can send completed petitions to National Health Federation,
P.O. Box 288 Mossyrock, WA, 98564, USA
The National Health Federation (NHF) is the first organization to endorse and support the Medical Freedom Amendment. Hopefully, other organizations will soon follow in NHF's footsteps. This comports with NHF's nearly seven-decades-long tradition of promoting and defending health freedom as well as its long history of consumer and individual health protection on local and global levels, including its unique position of participation in the Codex Alimentarius process.
The NHF Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign

-Michael LeVesque-
0 Comments

Medical Freedom Amendment 28 Anthem

3/5/2025

0 Comments

 

National Health Federation Celebrates 70 years
fighting for Health Freedom!

 Medical Freedom Amendment Anthem

The National Health Federation 70th Anniversary Celebration

Picture
LEADING THE HEALTH-FREEDOM RENAISSANCE
MARCH 14-16 IN DALLAS, TEXAS

Renaissance Dallas North Hotel - (972) 869-4300
1590 Lyndon B Johnson Freeway, Dallas, Texas 75234

     Be part of a historic gathering in Dallas, Texas, as the National Health Federation commemorates seven decades of championing your right to health freedom. Discover groundbreaking insights and connect with like-minded individuals dedicated to health advocacy.
     There will be more than 18 special guests presenting over a wide range of subjects related to health freedom with over 20 booths promoting products, actions and information. The Keynote presentation will be given by Dr. Peter McCullough, M.D. Also present will be Judy Mikovits, PhD and Dr. Thomas Levy as well as the President of the NHF, Scott Tips, J.D..
           You can register here and entrance to the event is only $45.00.
     Below is a PDF of the Medical Freedom Amendment brochure to be given out.


Your browser does not support viewing this document. Click here to download the document.
0 Comments
<<Previous

    Archives

    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022

    Michael LeVesque

    Webmaster and Gatekeeper,
    Board Member of the National Health Federation

    RSS Feed

    Picture

      Signup for the Medical Freedom Amendment Broadcast

    Subscribe
    We have no marketing or promotional materials - only the Broadcast.