Medical Freedom and Parental Consent Destroyed
This is the most disturbing Blog to share. It reports bias and ignorance of such depth and despotic behavior that allowed to continue will be the end of government by the people, for the people, of the people. Only a massive rejection of these egregious actions can save us, More than ever we need the protections of parental rights and medical freedom from interference by a government that no longer thinks and acts rationally.
As one will witnesses attacks on medical freedom by the many people in power and especially in the Court system how can justice prevail? These action demonstrate that parental rights have disappeared and children have become property of the State. These court decisions are being repeated in other States. It is essential to comprehend the impact and dangers for the future and must be shared as much as possible. This first example is general.
There are currently cases in the US where our government has kidnapped children because of medical choices and or procedures about which the child may or may not disagree with their parents, or the hospital disagrees with the parent's decision which prefers a different treatment not recognized by the standard of care of the hospital. This denial of informed consent and medical freedom is egregious and destructive of many rights and freedom.
Here is some advice to all parents.
The greatest loss of medical rights is usually signed away when people are offered forms and the person signs them without reading and editing in blue ink. Any medical form offered should be read and where necessary include medical rights protection added where necessary. Medical interventions occur when people sign their rights over to the hospital or doctor usually unknowingly.
Beware giving away your medical rights! When forms are edited properly, the hospital and staff will treat you differently and respectfully. They do not want to be sued. Require informed consent for all medical interventions. This is an excellent article for direction on this issue by Dr. Andrew Kaufman.
The Medical Freedom Amendment needs to be purposely broad and clear to cover all threats and abuses possible - which are numerous, unpredictable, and unforeseeable. Its passage is necessary during these times, proven by past actions and in grave danger in the future.
Medical choice includes medical intervention which requires medical choice and informed consent. As with the First Amendment, it is short and broad. To be clear, the most important part of the Amendment is the first sentence: "All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose."
In the case of parental rights, informed consent requires that the person giving consent not only is fully informed, they are also capable of comprehending the full meaning of any medical procedure, comprehending its ramifications and outcome. Children are not of that age. They come under the sole protection and decision of the parents. This is the case unless a legal warrant meeting all the conditions of the Medical Freedom Amendment requirements to issue a warrant as stated in the second paragraph of the Amendment are met. This necessary protection has recently been denied by the government at all levels - legislative, executive, and judicial and actions were taken without parental consent or warrant. See the Blog for specific details of this struggle.
Those requirements of the Medical Freedom Amendment's warrant are "individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents." ALL OF THESE CONDITIONS MUST BE MET BEFORE A MEDICAL INTERVENTION CAN OCCUR at any level of control and especially for a child one must prove that this action is required to protect society from harm which is rarely the case.
According to a decision made by the Vermont Supreme Court, the government is able to inject kids with experimental products — even if the father and mother do not give their permission. The court, like the Supreme Court of South Carolina made an egregious decision validating the outdated Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act. The Court never addressed privacy protections under state or federal law nor matters of bodily autonomy. This case involved a six year old boy who was forcibly taken from the classroom without calling parents and given a COVID-19 "countermeasure" called a vaccination under duress.
Attorney John Klar reported, "“…acting ‘under color’ of Vermont law – and cloaked in its authority, took L.P. from his seat in class, and while L.P.protested, escorted him to the clinic.
“This action deprived L.P., and, derivatively, his parents, of their Article 11 right to be free in their persons from unreasonable seizure by agents of the State, without due process.
“[School officials] then injected L.P. with an experimental substance, while they held him in place. They did it without consent, while L.P. protested what they were doing to him.
“This act deprived L.P., and, derivatively, his parents, of their Article 11 right to be free from intrusion into their bodily integrity by agents of the State, without due process.”
One need not be an attorney to see that what was done to this child by a government authority was every parent’s worst nightmare. If that nightmare could be made worse, it would be by a state court system that denied any relief to the family: a court system that sided absolutely with the federal government and a large corporate manufacturer at the expense of all Vermont children’s rights!
Such rights to our children’s safety can never be abrogated by any court in this land. Fundamental liberties are ‘inalienable’ by any government action including federal statute (including the PREP Act), and regardless of whether Vermont’s highest court can comprehend that this is the Supreme law of this land."
READ IN APP for much more detail and significance to this case.
The federal PREP Act makes no reference to parental consent. It has left that to the courts which are destroying longstanding, essential medical rights of parents and informed consent, and unreasonable seizure. This was an act of force against the will of a child under age, without parental consent, who could not physically fight back and was forcibly injected with a genetically modified organism that is also proven experimental, harmful, and dangerous.
It is not a vaccine. It is government approved injections as anti-terrorists’ “countermeasure” in the form of technological computerized formulas in a sea of chemicals foreign to our bodies of a genetically modified organism under authority of the Patriot Act of 2001, and the PREP Act of 2005 to function as a military response with immunity of liability. The PREP Act is no longer active. The most recent analysis of the effects of this injection shows great possible harm.
Is the State destroying public education by such brutal, barbaric, and draconian actions? What parent can now trust a public government school or public health clinic when seeking help for their child?
A 2023 review of academic literature concluded:
“Ethical challenges can arise when vaccines are mandated for all ages, but they increase significantly when mandated for children…
“Children are less susceptible to COVID-19; the disease severity in children is mild, and the potential benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine are low, so mandating vaccines is untenable…
“Mandates imply coercion, which might agitate the reaction towards COVID-19 vaccination and increase anti-vaccination attitudes among the public.”
My personal interpretation of what is occurring is the realization that we have a government based on fascism. Corporate law has overtaken the Rule of Law. The government is a corporation with stock holders, which includes everyone with a social security number, and the courts are corporations as well with stock holders and they are now meting out decisions based on legal corporate law that are feudal, oppressive, undemocratic, authoritarian based on corporate legislative acts and the denial of the Rule of Law. We are in Feudal fascism.
These decisions are egregious and frighteningly displaying the denial of freedom and rights in this country. The United States has become a colony to corporate wealth that feeds off the wealth of the general public. We are constantly reminded of the dangers of Communism and ignore the dangers of Fascism. It is time to recognize this insidious change that has taken place.
This is destruction of freedom and rights that is so abusive that one's anger must be tempered so as not to do something foolish in response. However, there must be a response to hold all parties responsible and legally at fault through some means or another. Rebellion for such acts requires organization and management.
The Medical Freedom Amendment can provide that coming together and organized rebellion against those striking down freedom and rights.
"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.
Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
Here's the help you need to make it happen.
Support the National Health Federation’s Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign to connect with your legislators and aid the lobbying of the NHF.
The time is NOW!
-Michael LeVesque-
As one will witnesses attacks on medical freedom by the many people in power and especially in the Court system how can justice prevail? These action demonstrate that parental rights have disappeared and children have become property of the State. These court decisions are being repeated in other States. It is essential to comprehend the impact and dangers for the future and must be shared as much as possible. This first example is general.
There are currently cases in the US where our government has kidnapped children because of medical choices and or procedures about which the child may or may not disagree with their parents, or the hospital disagrees with the parent's decision which prefers a different treatment not recognized by the standard of care of the hospital. This denial of informed consent and medical freedom is egregious and destructive of many rights and freedom.
Here is some advice to all parents.
The greatest loss of medical rights is usually signed away when people are offered forms and the person signs them without reading and editing in blue ink. Any medical form offered should be read and where necessary include medical rights protection added where necessary. Medical interventions occur when people sign their rights over to the hospital or doctor usually unknowingly.
Beware giving away your medical rights! When forms are edited properly, the hospital and staff will treat you differently and respectfully. They do not want to be sued. Require informed consent for all medical interventions. This is an excellent article for direction on this issue by Dr. Andrew Kaufman.
The Medical Freedom Amendment needs to be purposely broad and clear to cover all threats and abuses possible - which are numerous, unpredictable, and unforeseeable. Its passage is necessary during these times, proven by past actions and in grave danger in the future.
Medical choice includes medical intervention which requires medical choice and informed consent. As with the First Amendment, it is short and broad. To be clear, the most important part of the Amendment is the first sentence: "All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose."
In the case of parental rights, informed consent requires that the person giving consent not only is fully informed, they are also capable of comprehending the full meaning of any medical procedure, comprehending its ramifications and outcome. Children are not of that age. They come under the sole protection and decision of the parents. This is the case unless a legal warrant meeting all the conditions of the Medical Freedom Amendment requirements to issue a warrant as stated in the second paragraph of the Amendment are met. This necessary protection has recently been denied by the government at all levels - legislative, executive, and judicial and actions were taken without parental consent or warrant. See the Blog for specific details of this struggle.
Those requirements of the Medical Freedom Amendment's warrant are "individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents." ALL OF THESE CONDITIONS MUST BE MET BEFORE A MEDICAL INTERVENTION CAN OCCUR at any level of control and especially for a child one must prove that this action is required to protect society from harm which is rarely the case.
According to a decision made by the Vermont Supreme Court, the government is able to inject kids with experimental products — even if the father and mother do not give their permission. The court, like the Supreme Court of South Carolina made an egregious decision validating the outdated Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act. The Court never addressed privacy protections under state or federal law nor matters of bodily autonomy. This case involved a six year old boy who was forcibly taken from the classroom without calling parents and given a COVID-19 "countermeasure" called a vaccination under duress.
Attorney John Klar reported, "“…acting ‘under color’ of Vermont law – and cloaked in its authority, took L.P. from his seat in class, and while L.P.protested, escorted him to the clinic.
“This action deprived L.P., and, derivatively, his parents, of their Article 11 right to be free in their persons from unreasonable seizure by agents of the State, without due process.
“[School officials] then injected L.P. with an experimental substance, while they held him in place. They did it without consent, while L.P. protested what they were doing to him.
“This act deprived L.P., and, derivatively, his parents, of their Article 11 right to be free from intrusion into their bodily integrity by agents of the State, without due process.”
One need not be an attorney to see that what was done to this child by a government authority was every parent’s worst nightmare. If that nightmare could be made worse, it would be by a state court system that denied any relief to the family: a court system that sided absolutely with the federal government and a large corporate manufacturer at the expense of all Vermont children’s rights!
Such rights to our children’s safety can never be abrogated by any court in this land. Fundamental liberties are ‘inalienable’ by any government action including federal statute (including the PREP Act), and regardless of whether Vermont’s highest court can comprehend that this is the Supreme law of this land."
READ IN APP for much more detail and significance to this case.
The federal PREP Act makes no reference to parental consent. It has left that to the courts which are destroying longstanding, essential medical rights of parents and informed consent, and unreasonable seizure. This was an act of force against the will of a child under age, without parental consent, who could not physically fight back and was forcibly injected with a genetically modified organism that is also proven experimental, harmful, and dangerous.
It is not a vaccine. It is government approved injections as anti-terrorists’ “countermeasure” in the form of technological computerized formulas in a sea of chemicals foreign to our bodies of a genetically modified organism under authority of the Patriot Act of 2001, and the PREP Act of 2005 to function as a military response with immunity of liability. The PREP Act is no longer active. The most recent analysis of the effects of this injection shows great possible harm.
Is the State destroying public education by such brutal, barbaric, and draconian actions? What parent can now trust a public government school or public health clinic when seeking help for their child?
A 2023 review of academic literature concluded:
“Ethical challenges can arise when vaccines are mandated for all ages, but they increase significantly when mandated for children…
“Children are less susceptible to COVID-19; the disease severity in children is mild, and the potential benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine are low, so mandating vaccines is untenable…
“Mandates imply coercion, which might agitate the reaction towards COVID-19 vaccination and increase anti-vaccination attitudes among the public.”
My personal interpretation of what is occurring is the realization that we have a government based on fascism. Corporate law has overtaken the Rule of Law. The government is a corporation with stock holders, which includes everyone with a social security number, and the courts are corporations as well with stock holders and they are now meting out decisions based on legal corporate law that are feudal, oppressive, undemocratic, authoritarian based on corporate legislative acts and the denial of the Rule of Law. We are in Feudal fascism.
These decisions are egregious and frighteningly displaying the denial of freedom and rights in this country. The United States has become a colony to corporate wealth that feeds off the wealth of the general public. We are constantly reminded of the dangers of Communism and ignore the dangers of Fascism. It is time to recognize this insidious change that has taken place.
This is destruction of freedom and rights that is so abusive that one's anger must be tempered so as not to do something foolish in response. However, there must be a response to hold all parties responsible and legally at fault through some means or another. Rebellion for such acts requires organization and management.
The Medical Freedom Amendment can provide that coming together and organized rebellion against those striking down freedom and rights.
"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.
Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
Here's the help you need to make it happen.
Support the National Health Federation’s Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign to connect with your legislators and aid the lobbying of the NHF.
The time is NOW!
-Michael LeVesque-
RSS Feed
