Quick Breakdown on the Medical Freedom Amendment

How the Medical Freedom Amendment
Protects Medical Freedom

The proposed Medical Freedom Amendment (MFA) as the 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution first proposed in 2020 is gaining much support. Now your support is essential. The National Health Federation is the first organization to  endorse and promote the MFA and is pushing forward the pendulum of change to success.
The Medical Freedom Amendment:

"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive order, emergency declaration, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that: 

1. Impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.

2. Impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."

Here is a breakdown of the MFA and its implications:
1. “All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose.”

• Establishes health sovereignty as a natural right, not a state-granted privilege.
• It connects to the broader philosophy that health is part of life and liberty, not public property.
• It also means that the government cannot define “public health” in ways that override individual choice.

2. Enumerating Explicit Limits on Power

• Note the meticulous listing: Congress, the President, State Legislatures, Executives, Agencies, Departments.
  • This makes it clear the restriction applies to every level of government — federal, state, and local.
• The inclusion of “countermeasure, executive order, emergency declaration” directly addresses what happened during the COVID era, when extraordinary powers were invoked to bypass laws and constitutional checks.
• “Treaty or international agreement” language is crucial. It prevents global health treaties — such as those proposed by the World Health Organization, UN, or World Economic Forum — from overriding individual rights through the Supremacy Clause (Article VI) of the Constitution.
  • This is essentially a constitutional firewall against global governance in medical policy.

3. Article VI Nullification Clause

• The line “The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment” is extremely rare and radical in constitutional design.
• It means international treaties or WHO agreements could never supersede this Amendment, even if ratified by the Senate.
• In simple terms, no global authority could compel Americans to accept mandates, digital vaccine IDs, or global emergency protocols.

4. Judicial Warrant Requirement

• The second paragraph pushes medical privacy protections to a Fourth Amendment level.
• It declares that no intrusion on personal medical freedom or privacy can occur without a specific judicial warrant, based on probable cause (“Oath and affirmation”) and describing the exact harm and danger posed.
• This would:
  • Outlaw broad “public health emergencies” used to justify mass surveillance, quarantines, or forced testing.
  • Require individualized assessment before violating medical privacy — ending blanket “emergency powers.”

In essence, this wording reflects strict constitutional originalism infused with bodily autonomy. It recognizes that:

• The state is not competent to define individual health decisions.
• Informed consent is sacred — and cannot be suspended, even during a proclaimed emergency.
• International bodies cannot be allowed to shape domestic health policy or override individual rights.

The Medical Freedom Amendment treats medical autonomy as the ultimate civil right, equal to speech, property, and belief. Once ratified, the constitutional order would shift from a managerial administrative decree to a consent‑based republic in practical health governance.
Please join the National Health Federation in this monumental fight for Health Freedom!
Sign the petition, support NHF’s lobbying, and donate to their efforts.
Thank you! Medical Freedom Amendment.
-Michael LeVesque-