Witnessing the Acts of Betrayal
Medical dictatorship has grown to the degree that it is now a major disease of society. Dr. Benjamin Rush, the Nation's first Surgeon General and personal physician to George Washington warned "the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship". He stated that the US Constitution required an amendment securing medical freedom, just as there is the requirement for freedom of speech and religion.
The government has dangerously intervened in medical choice. It has taken on the role of authority over body autonomy and medical options. It is important to comprehend the difference between the legal and philosophical contexts of "choice" and "intervention" that fundamentally have different actions, with distinct implications for autonomy, authority, and external influence.
Choice is where an individual exercises autonomy without external compulsion, selecting or deciding between alternatives freely and voluntarily. It is a personal decision and an individual's right and free will. It is two parts- the right to full information without censorship and the freedom to say “yes” or “no”. For this to occur legally, the medical profession must provide all relevant information for the individual with a full comprehension of the consequences. Informed Consent is a Rule of Law that protects all aspects of Choice.
Intervention refers to the act of stepping in or interfering, typically by an external party, to alter, influence, or control a situation. The state, a court, or another party can initiate it to address situations where laws or public interests are at stake. This usually occurs when there is a perceived harm, threat, or need to regulate behavior or conditions.
Governmental authority allows the regulation of health, safety, and welfare of the public and to intervene in certain cases of child abuse, public safety, or when public policy requires action. This was the rationale used during the recent pandemic imposing quarantines, mandating vaccines, and other actions for the sake of protecting the public. However, our system has a deep flaw of bias towards pharmaceutical drugs.
Medical interventions occur when individual actions pose risks to others or the broader public interest. This is on an individual basis, when a patient is incapacitated to act or a public health concern arises (e.g., contagious disease). It requires a court or public health authority to mandate treatment or quarantine for the safety of others.
There was great abuse by the governmental medical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic as revealed later regarding most policies put in place for propaganda and behavior control. These actions of masks, distancing, lockdowns, and “countermeasures” (vaccines) were draconian, abusive, irrational, dangerous and wrong.
The court system has supported government actions based on emergency powers and immunity powers. Courts acknowledged verbally that decisions based on Federal legislative laws were "egregious" in their application, especially in the actions of parental rights.
Child protective services in family law may intervene if there is evidence of abuse or neglect, overriding the parents' choices for the child’s safety. To infringe on the medical choices have proven to be draconian and counter intuitive for the health of the child, especially in cases where parents have chosen alternative medical treatments rather than the American Medical Association Standard of Care.
The Medical Freedom Amendment protects body autonomy as absolute, and any infringement requires an "...individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
The medical monopoly controlling the health of America has failed and continues to be the largest expense of our government with the worst results. The battles between the different schools of medicine did not result in competition and excellence. Instead in 1910 the Flexner Report began the steady elimination of effective schools of alternative and traditional medicine resulting in the monopoly of allopathic, industrialized medicine based on poisons of pharmaceuticals and radical medical interventions.
I witnessed the AIDS epidemic grow out of control in San Francisco as pharmaceuticals wiped out so many that could have been saved by the Eclectics of the 1900's and the homeopaths, the osteopaths, the acupuncturists, the nutritionists, the great array of medical knowledge that was not pursued, ignored, and buried.
Again, over and over, I witnessed the people on multiple medications with several medical doctors not paying attention to each other's prescriptions. The system of today would be different if the two wealthiest men in the world, John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie had not sought control medicine, seeking profits, and destroying competition by closing alternative medical schools and through the government enforce the Flexner Report of 1910. It was the beginning of the tragic decline of medical service to the patient, experimentation at any cost, and chemical coal tar industrialization of medicine.
I witnessed the great debacle of the so-called Pandemic with its singular, blinded, and twisted mentality that has brought the nation to its knees, now rising again, only to see the government learned nothing, remains arrogant, and ready to do it all over again using the same wrong medical industrial choices and now court authorization for autocratic enforcement.
Do we need the Medical Freedom Amendment? Do we need to protect each Individual soul from the maligned, shortsighted and wrong decisions of our government's medical interventions? Do we need the protection of Choice? Absolutely! Everyone must have the right to decline medical interventions without retribution.
If you had known that you were being "countermeasured" as an intervention would you roll up your sleeve for the pharmaceutical profits and experimentation guaranteeing expense of further medical bills? You were lied to, it wasn't a vaccination at all, it was an injection of a "countermeasure".
You are protected by the Rule of Law of Informed Consent and when you signed the paper to be "countermeasured" did they tell you the truth, the facts, that you were a human experiment, that it could kill or harm you?
You and every person injected with a "countermeasure" were an experiment straight out of the John Hopkins school of medicine based on the Flexner Report of 1910 that assured the government would remain committed to pharmacology as the only allowable medical intervention.
Meanwhile, looking for a pharma cure producing major adverse effects that included death. Investors in the Pharma drugs benefit economically at the front end at taxpayers’ expense and the back end as new medical ailments emerge at more costs and suffering. It was not about patient care. It was about single-minded experimentation enhanced by arrogance and censorship. Ethics, morality and justice ignored.
Here is the Medical Freedom Amendment. It is your Amendment to have for yourself and your family and friends. Make it happen. I know you will.
"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.
Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
Here's the help you need to make it happen.
Support the National Health Federation’s Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign to connect with your legislators and aid the lobbying of the NHF. The time is NOW!
-Michael LeVesque-
The government has dangerously intervened in medical choice. It has taken on the role of authority over body autonomy and medical options. It is important to comprehend the difference between the legal and philosophical contexts of "choice" and "intervention" that fundamentally have different actions, with distinct implications for autonomy, authority, and external influence.
Choice is where an individual exercises autonomy without external compulsion, selecting or deciding between alternatives freely and voluntarily. It is a personal decision and an individual's right and free will. It is two parts- the right to full information without censorship and the freedom to say “yes” or “no”. For this to occur legally, the medical profession must provide all relevant information for the individual with a full comprehension of the consequences. Informed Consent is a Rule of Law that protects all aspects of Choice.
Intervention refers to the act of stepping in or interfering, typically by an external party, to alter, influence, or control a situation. The state, a court, or another party can initiate it to address situations where laws or public interests are at stake. This usually occurs when there is a perceived harm, threat, or need to regulate behavior or conditions.
Governmental authority allows the regulation of health, safety, and welfare of the public and to intervene in certain cases of child abuse, public safety, or when public policy requires action. This was the rationale used during the recent pandemic imposing quarantines, mandating vaccines, and other actions for the sake of protecting the public. However, our system has a deep flaw of bias towards pharmaceutical drugs.
Medical interventions occur when individual actions pose risks to others or the broader public interest. This is on an individual basis, when a patient is incapacitated to act or a public health concern arises (e.g., contagious disease). It requires a court or public health authority to mandate treatment or quarantine for the safety of others.
There was great abuse by the governmental medical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic as revealed later regarding most policies put in place for propaganda and behavior control. These actions of masks, distancing, lockdowns, and “countermeasures” (vaccines) were draconian, abusive, irrational, dangerous and wrong.
The court system has supported government actions based on emergency powers and immunity powers. Courts acknowledged verbally that decisions based on Federal legislative laws were "egregious" in their application, especially in the actions of parental rights.
Child protective services in family law may intervene if there is evidence of abuse or neglect, overriding the parents' choices for the child’s safety. To infringe on the medical choices have proven to be draconian and counter intuitive for the health of the child, especially in cases where parents have chosen alternative medical treatments rather than the American Medical Association Standard of Care.
The Medical Freedom Amendment protects body autonomy as absolute, and any infringement requires an "...individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
The medical monopoly controlling the health of America has failed and continues to be the largest expense of our government with the worst results. The battles between the different schools of medicine did not result in competition and excellence. Instead in 1910 the Flexner Report began the steady elimination of effective schools of alternative and traditional medicine resulting in the monopoly of allopathic, industrialized medicine based on poisons of pharmaceuticals and radical medical interventions.
I witnessed the AIDS epidemic grow out of control in San Francisco as pharmaceuticals wiped out so many that could have been saved by the Eclectics of the 1900's and the homeopaths, the osteopaths, the acupuncturists, the nutritionists, the great array of medical knowledge that was not pursued, ignored, and buried.
Again, over and over, I witnessed the people on multiple medications with several medical doctors not paying attention to each other's prescriptions. The system of today would be different if the two wealthiest men in the world, John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie had not sought control medicine, seeking profits, and destroying competition by closing alternative medical schools and through the government enforce the Flexner Report of 1910. It was the beginning of the tragic decline of medical service to the patient, experimentation at any cost, and chemical coal tar industrialization of medicine.
I witnessed the great debacle of the so-called Pandemic with its singular, blinded, and twisted mentality that has brought the nation to its knees, now rising again, only to see the government learned nothing, remains arrogant, and ready to do it all over again using the same wrong medical industrial choices and now court authorization for autocratic enforcement.
Do we need the Medical Freedom Amendment? Do we need to protect each Individual soul from the maligned, shortsighted and wrong decisions of our government's medical interventions? Do we need the protection of Choice? Absolutely! Everyone must have the right to decline medical interventions without retribution.
If you had known that you were being "countermeasured" as an intervention would you roll up your sleeve for the pharmaceutical profits and experimentation guaranteeing expense of further medical bills? You were lied to, it wasn't a vaccination at all, it was an injection of a "countermeasure".
You are protected by the Rule of Law of Informed Consent and when you signed the paper to be "countermeasured" did they tell you the truth, the facts, that you were a human experiment, that it could kill or harm you?
You and every person injected with a "countermeasure" were an experiment straight out of the John Hopkins school of medicine based on the Flexner Report of 1910 that assured the government would remain committed to pharmacology as the only allowable medical intervention.
Meanwhile, looking for a pharma cure producing major adverse effects that included death. Investors in the Pharma drugs benefit economically at the front end at taxpayers’ expense and the back end as new medical ailments emerge at more costs and suffering. It was not about patient care. It was about single-minded experimentation enhanced by arrogance and censorship. Ethics, morality and justice ignored.
Here is the Medical Freedom Amendment. It is your Amendment to have for yourself and your family and friends. Make it happen. I know you will.
"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.
Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive, emergency order, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
Here's the help you need to make it happen.
Support the National Health Federation’s Medical Freedom Amendment Campaign to connect with your legislators and aid the lobbying of the NHF. The time is NOW!
-Michael LeVesque-
RSS Feed
