Some Questions and Answers
1- What is the Medical Freedom Amendment?
2- Is there a historical basis for the MFA enactment?
3- How does the MFA affect practitioners?
4- How does the MFA interact with Public Health?
5- How does the MFA protect the Individual's medical choice?
6- What are the current dangers to medical freedom and informed consent?
7- How does it become an Amendment?
8- Who supports the MFA as it moves forward?
9- How can people get involved and support it?
10- How necessary is it to act now?
1- What is the Medical Freedom Amendment?
It is the proposed 28th Amendment in two paragraphs styled after the First and Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution. It reads:
"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive order, emergency declaration, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.
Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive order, emergency declaration, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
Medical Freedom is the individual's absolute and inalienable right to autonomy over one's body regarding all medical treatment. The amendment presents a wall of opposition against all government medical interventions to an Individual except under specific and qualifying stipulations and conditions.
2- Is there a historical basis for the MFA enactment?
Yes, the Founding Fathers included a few doctors. They petitioned the Constitutional Convention to include a Medical Freedom Amendment. Most famous is Doctor Benjamin Rush, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, friend to Thomas Paine, personal physician to Benjamin Franklin and George Washington, and the Nation’s first Surgeon General. He recognized how easily medical tyranny could develop in the country and was a devoted proponent of medical freedom stating: “Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship…”
If it were possible for those Founding Fathers of liberty and independence to have foreseen the future of the medical abuses of Dr. Mengele and Nazi Germany happening 200 hundred years in the future, it is most certain a medical freedom amendment would already be included in the United States Constitution.
3- How does the MFA affect practitioners?
The patient-physician partnership is a one-on-one relationship making clinical care decisions, with the patient reserving ultimate authority to decide.
Your clinical care decisions must not be predetermined by government bureaucrats, statistical analyses, industry influence, insurance carriers, or other outside influences. As an individual there are many factors to be considered, and other factors forbidden.
Coercion of any manner, including bribery, incentives, threats, extortion, public shaming, scapegoating, exclusion or ostracism from society are illegal and unethical. Also, deceptive advertising applied to patients or health care providers, is a violation.
4- How does the MFA interact with Public Health?
Public Health is extremely important and the major factor for reducing chronic diseases. It does this by seeking and identifying causes of disease and eliminating or remediating the problem. It has been tremendously successful in its work with the environment in the past, especially in sanitation a major cause for the reduction of epidemics and disease.
Presently pollution is the number one cause of chronic disease. Pollution is broad and covers electromagnetic radiation pollution, chemical and pharmaceutical pollution, genetically modified organisms of bioengineering, and chemical trails of geoengineering pollution, agricultural and manufacturing pollution. Unfortunately, Public Health turns a blind eye, or legislation is created to protect the guilty. As a result, pollutants are sprayed, injected, radiated, exploded and spread without medical choice, or informed consent. We do not need a war on cancer. We need to mitigate the causes of cancer!
However, today Public Health has taken on the role of Private health using its powers erroneously with nefarious intentions when it denies medical freedom and informed consent. Public Health ignores the effects of electromagnetic radiation pollution and is no longer acting to stop chemical and genetic modification dangers in the environment. Public Health now acts as judge and jury for the relationship of the patient and practitioner endangering individual health.
5- How does the MFA protect the Individual's medical choice?
Medical choice emphasizes an Individual’s right to make decisions about their healthcare, including treatment options, providers, and interventions, or nothing at all.
There is an overlap between medical choice and informed consent, emphasizing that informed decision-making is a key aspect of exercising medical choice.
In the Nuremberg Code of 1947 after World War II Medical Informed Consent is the very first point. It is a Rule of Law that ensures the Individual has the right to be fully informed and comprehend the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a medical intervention before deciding.
Informed Consent is the most critical issue of the 21st century. It is the cornerstone of medical freedom, individual health and medical choice. As a Rule of Law, it cannot be pre-empted nor is it conditional. Therefore, there are no actions restraining its actions and enforcement.
6- What are the current dangers to medical freedom and informed consent?
There have been several cases involving children where without or against parental consent were physically forced COVID-19 vaccination. These cases found the courts’ rulings in favor of the government meanwhile stating their decisions were egregious, knowing they were morally and ethically wrong.
In 1906 the Flexner Report was issued financed by John D Rockefeller, the richest man in the world at the time, and Andrew Carnegie, the second richest, to study the German medical profession based on scientific principles of the 20th century. The Flexner Report gave detailed regulations of education and pharmacology as the only solution against diseases. All medical research must adhere fully to the protocols of scientific research of the 1910 materialism, medication, and vaccination. Within 10 years the number of medical schools dropped from 650 to 50, the number of medical students decreased from 7500 to 2500. With advances in biochemistry, bionutrition, and biophysics this view of the world allopathic medicine will become outdated yet maintained today.
1927 the Food and Drug Administration is created out of the Bureau of Chemistry. Its goal is to promote pharmaceutical products and stop any products that compete in the marketplace.
In 1997 the World Health Organization of the United Nations obtained full control over medicine for all 196 Nation members. The power of the Flexner Report is worldwide and allopathic medical care the world standard, yet Homeopathy is used more than any other medical aid.
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 placed medical health outside the powers of medical science into the hands of engineers of the wireless industry. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had already determined the dangers of EMR pollution. This enables the wireless industry unlimited expansion while exposing the entire population to electromagnetic radiation interictal spike pulsations so highly multiplied and strong they initiate every conceivable illness, cancer, while harming plants, animals, insects, and the atmosphere.
Now in 2025 the WHO is eliminating human rights, informed consent, dignity, and medical freedom by new laws that seek to develop and authorize unlicensed drugs and vaccines without due process of law, nor protects individual’s medical freedom and economic rights. The new laws seeks to provide a liability shield for these unlicensed products from legal actions.
There are two ways to propose and ratify amendments to the United States Constitution as defined under Article V. One is two-thirds of both houses of Congress can vote to propose an amendment. Second, two-thirds of the state legislatures can ask Congress to call a national convention to propose the adding of amendments.
To ratify amendments, three-fourths of the state legislatures must approve them. Another option are ratifying conventions in three-fourths of the states must approve them. The Supreme Court has stated ratification must be within "some reasonable time after the proposal."
Starting with the passage of the 18th amendment, Congress set a definite period for ratification. A period of seven years was established in the case of the 18th, 20th, 21st, and 22nd amendments.
However, there has been no determination as to just how long a "reasonable time" can or should be for passage of a new amendment.
8- Who supports the MFA as it moves forward?
The first to support and endorse the Medical Freedom Amendment is the National Health Federation (NHF). They have continued to provide within their magazine a Medical Freedom Amendment Broadcast column. They also have within their website provided a campaign that anyone can take part found by clicking Current Campaigns button on their Home Page. The interest in moving forward with the Amendment has grown and now more than ever is needed.
It is an honor to present before the Functional Diagnostic Nutrition organization and the support of Reed Davis in inviting this presentation of the Medical Freedom Amendment.
9- How can people get involved and support it?
The NHF website provides a campaign that anyone can use by clicking Current Campaigns button on their Home Page, thenhf.com. Scott Tips NHF President and the Board of Governors have unanimously endorsed the Amendment. The movement forward is growing and more than ever it needs public support
https://thenhf.com/current-campaigns/
10- How necessary is it to act now?
Tedros Ghebreyesus Director of WHO and Bill Gates are in tandem as they begin their draconian actions with WHO Member Nations. The most recent addition took place in Singapore. On May 5th, 2025, Bill Gates announced at the Philanthropy Asia Summit 2025, that the Gates Foundation would open a new Asia office in Singapore supported by the Singapore Economic Development Board.
Coincidentally, it was reminded of its recent passage of new amendments to Singapore’s Infectious Disease Act (IDA). These changes declare the government’s right to forced vaccination whenever they declare it necessary for public health. Citizens who decline government-ordered vaccinations can face six to twelve months in jail and fines from US $7,000 to $15,000.
Also, the government authorized forced vaccination under Section 47 of the IDA with the power to force vaccination of citizens if an “outbreak of an infectious disease in any area of Singapore is imminent.” Good-bye body autonomy, hello search and seizure…
These laws and rules give the Director-General of Health complete control over medical freedom, medical rights, medical choice, medical privacy, and informed consent.
This is the direction that state governments throughout the world are viewing the rights of medical choice, medical privacy, medical freedom, and informed consent. We must act as soon as possible to protect these rights from denial.
-Michael LeVesque-
2- Is there a historical basis for the MFA enactment?
3- How does the MFA affect practitioners?
4- How does the MFA interact with Public Health?
5- How does the MFA protect the Individual's medical choice?
6- What are the current dangers to medical freedom and informed consent?
7- How does it become an Amendment?
8- Who supports the MFA as it moves forward?
9- How can people get involved and support it?
10- How necessary is it to act now?
1- What is the Medical Freedom Amendment?
It is the proposed 28th Amendment in two paragraphs styled after the First and Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution. It reads:
"All people have the Right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Congress, the President, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive order, emergency declaration, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. The treaty provision of Article VI of this Constitution shall not apply in any way to this amendment.
Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures and Executives, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law, rule, regulation, countermeasure, executive order, emergency declaration, or enter into any treaty or international agreement that impedes the Individual's right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual's condition and danger it presents."
Medical Freedom is the individual's absolute and inalienable right to autonomy over one's body regarding all medical treatment. The amendment presents a wall of opposition against all government medical interventions to an Individual except under specific and qualifying stipulations and conditions.
2- Is there a historical basis for the MFA enactment?
Yes, the Founding Fathers included a few doctors. They petitioned the Constitutional Convention to include a Medical Freedom Amendment. Most famous is Doctor Benjamin Rush, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, friend to Thomas Paine, personal physician to Benjamin Franklin and George Washington, and the Nation’s first Surgeon General. He recognized how easily medical tyranny could develop in the country and was a devoted proponent of medical freedom stating: “Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship…”
If it were possible for those Founding Fathers of liberty and independence to have foreseen the future of the medical abuses of Dr. Mengele and Nazi Germany happening 200 hundred years in the future, it is most certain a medical freedom amendment would already be included in the United States Constitution.
3- How does the MFA affect practitioners?
The patient-physician partnership is a one-on-one relationship making clinical care decisions, with the patient reserving ultimate authority to decide.
Your clinical care decisions must not be predetermined by government bureaucrats, statistical analyses, industry influence, insurance carriers, or other outside influences. As an individual there are many factors to be considered, and other factors forbidden.
Coercion of any manner, including bribery, incentives, threats, extortion, public shaming, scapegoating, exclusion or ostracism from society are illegal and unethical. Also, deceptive advertising applied to patients or health care providers, is a violation.
4- How does the MFA interact with Public Health?
Public Health is extremely important and the major factor for reducing chronic diseases. It does this by seeking and identifying causes of disease and eliminating or remediating the problem. It has been tremendously successful in its work with the environment in the past, especially in sanitation a major cause for the reduction of epidemics and disease.
Presently pollution is the number one cause of chronic disease. Pollution is broad and covers electromagnetic radiation pollution, chemical and pharmaceutical pollution, genetically modified organisms of bioengineering, and chemical trails of geoengineering pollution, agricultural and manufacturing pollution. Unfortunately, Public Health turns a blind eye, or legislation is created to protect the guilty. As a result, pollutants are sprayed, injected, radiated, exploded and spread without medical choice, or informed consent. We do not need a war on cancer. We need to mitigate the causes of cancer!
However, today Public Health has taken on the role of Private health using its powers erroneously with nefarious intentions when it denies medical freedom and informed consent. Public Health ignores the effects of electromagnetic radiation pollution and is no longer acting to stop chemical and genetic modification dangers in the environment. Public Health now acts as judge and jury for the relationship of the patient and practitioner endangering individual health.
5- How does the MFA protect the Individual's medical choice?
Medical choice emphasizes an Individual’s right to make decisions about their healthcare, including treatment options, providers, and interventions, or nothing at all.
There is an overlap between medical choice and informed consent, emphasizing that informed decision-making is a key aspect of exercising medical choice.
In the Nuremberg Code of 1947 after World War II Medical Informed Consent is the very first point. It is a Rule of Law that ensures the Individual has the right to be fully informed and comprehend the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a medical intervention before deciding.
Informed Consent is the most critical issue of the 21st century. It is the cornerstone of medical freedom, individual health and medical choice. As a Rule of Law, it cannot be pre-empted nor is it conditional. Therefore, there are no actions restraining its actions and enforcement.
6- What are the current dangers to medical freedom and informed consent?
There have been several cases involving children where without or against parental consent were physically forced COVID-19 vaccination. These cases found the courts’ rulings in favor of the government meanwhile stating their decisions were egregious, knowing they were morally and ethically wrong.
In 1906 the Flexner Report was issued financed by John D Rockefeller, the richest man in the world at the time, and Andrew Carnegie, the second richest, to study the German medical profession based on scientific principles of the 20th century. The Flexner Report gave detailed regulations of education and pharmacology as the only solution against diseases. All medical research must adhere fully to the protocols of scientific research of the 1910 materialism, medication, and vaccination. Within 10 years the number of medical schools dropped from 650 to 50, the number of medical students decreased from 7500 to 2500. With advances in biochemistry, bionutrition, and biophysics this view of the world allopathic medicine will become outdated yet maintained today.
1927 the Food and Drug Administration is created out of the Bureau of Chemistry. Its goal is to promote pharmaceutical products and stop any products that compete in the marketplace.
In 1997 the World Health Organization of the United Nations obtained full control over medicine for all 196 Nation members. The power of the Flexner Report is worldwide and allopathic medical care the world standard, yet Homeopathy is used more than any other medical aid.
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 placed medical health outside the powers of medical science into the hands of engineers of the wireless industry. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had already determined the dangers of EMR pollution. This enables the wireless industry unlimited expansion while exposing the entire population to electromagnetic radiation interictal spike pulsations so highly multiplied and strong they initiate every conceivable illness, cancer, while harming plants, animals, insects, and the atmosphere.
Now in 2025 the WHO is eliminating human rights, informed consent, dignity, and medical freedom by new laws that seek to develop and authorize unlicensed drugs and vaccines without due process of law, nor protects individual’s medical freedom and economic rights. The new laws seeks to provide a liability shield for these unlicensed products from legal actions.
- Vaccine Injury Act of 1986
- Manufacturers Cannot Be Sued for Injury or Death caused by a vaccine. Claiming vaccines are not safe and effective as a defense, but saying they are when being used as an experiment on the general population and without informed consent.
- USA Patriot Act of 2001
- Provides Emergency Use Act by military intervention
- Emergency Use Authorizations as Countermeasures
- The PREP Act of 2005
- Provides immunity from suit and liability under Federal and State law
- Approves forced medication and vaccination countermeasures
- Denies Informed Consent
- The FDA (Food and Drug Administration)
- Spring 2022 removed some VAERS reports (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System)
- Adopt "Future Framework" allowing reformulations of shots without clinical trials
- Effective January 23rd, 2024, not to require Informed Consent. Certified Government Publishing Office 88228
There are two ways to propose and ratify amendments to the United States Constitution as defined under Article V. One is two-thirds of both houses of Congress can vote to propose an amendment. Second, two-thirds of the state legislatures can ask Congress to call a national convention to propose the adding of amendments.
To ratify amendments, three-fourths of the state legislatures must approve them. Another option are ratifying conventions in three-fourths of the states must approve them. The Supreme Court has stated ratification must be within "some reasonable time after the proposal."
Starting with the passage of the 18th amendment, Congress set a definite period for ratification. A period of seven years was established in the case of the 18th, 20th, 21st, and 22nd amendments.
However, there has been no determination as to just how long a "reasonable time" can or should be for passage of a new amendment.
8- Who supports the MFA as it moves forward?
The first to support and endorse the Medical Freedom Amendment is the National Health Federation (NHF). They have continued to provide within their magazine a Medical Freedom Amendment Broadcast column. They also have within their website provided a campaign that anyone can take part found by clicking Current Campaigns button on their Home Page. The interest in moving forward with the Amendment has grown and now more than ever is needed.
It is an honor to present before the Functional Diagnostic Nutrition organization and the support of Reed Davis in inviting this presentation of the Medical Freedom Amendment.
9- How can people get involved and support it?
The NHF website provides a campaign that anyone can use by clicking Current Campaigns button on their Home Page, thenhf.com. Scott Tips NHF President and the Board of Governors have unanimously endorsed the Amendment. The movement forward is growing and more than ever it needs public support
https://thenhf.com/current-campaigns/
10- How necessary is it to act now?
Tedros Ghebreyesus Director of WHO and Bill Gates are in tandem as they begin their draconian actions with WHO Member Nations. The most recent addition took place in Singapore. On May 5th, 2025, Bill Gates announced at the Philanthropy Asia Summit 2025, that the Gates Foundation would open a new Asia office in Singapore supported by the Singapore Economic Development Board.
Coincidentally, it was reminded of its recent passage of new amendments to Singapore’s Infectious Disease Act (IDA). These changes declare the government’s right to forced vaccination whenever they declare it necessary for public health. Citizens who decline government-ordered vaccinations can face six to twelve months in jail and fines from US $7,000 to $15,000.
Also, the government authorized forced vaccination under Section 47 of the IDA with the power to force vaccination of citizens if an “outbreak of an infectious disease in any area of Singapore is imminent.” Good-bye body autonomy, hello search and seizure…
These laws and rules give the Director-General of Health complete control over medical freedom, medical rights, medical choice, medical privacy, and informed consent.
This is the direction that state governments throughout the world are viewing the rights of medical choice, medical privacy, medical freedom, and informed consent. We must act as soon as possible to protect these rights from denial.
-Michael LeVesque-
RSS Feed
